I had the same focus problem.I choosed a different approach!
a search box above the celltable no more focus problems!
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-x3SMcWARv9Q/UmdCwRmBhdI/AAM/cfEYMiFRmdY/s1600/test.png
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to parse my xml string that contains some camel case attributes
and for some reason it just doesn't work.
Below is a simple test to help:
*@Test
public void xmlAttributeParsingProblem() {
Document oDoc = XMLParser.parse(tototata myAttribute=\titi\
Thanks for solution, removing break points (although they were never going
to be reached) helped me too in speeding up my application from super slow
mode.
On Thursday, April 7, 2011 12:45:45 AM UTC+5:30, PTJ wrote:
Recently I was running my GWT application in devmode via the Eclipse
plugin
Thomas,
thank you for your time and your Help. I will now migrate my application to
Objectitfy.
I am sick of JPA and Datanucleus and I am not willing to continue jumping
from one JPA problem into another. I hope Objectify will save me from this
struggling with Datastore.
Many Many thanks for
On successful login, 1st application screen is displayed. When user clicks
back button, he is redirected to login screen. Now without entering any
details or even clicking login button, he press forward browser button,
this takes him back to the 1st application screen with all data
Hi,
I guess this is quite simple, but I cannot find out how to do it. I have
implemented a suggest box as this:
MultiWordSuggestOracle oracle = new MultiWordSuggestOracle();
SuggestBox box = new SuggestBox(oracle);
The suggestBox is populated with street addresses. Each address contains
Hi,
I am working in large gwt application. I am using GWTP in the project and
have organised the project to be in different gwt modules under the same
project. while compiling all these modules are compiled to form a single
war file.
Now my issue is that even with a machine having 16GB of
Rajin,
1. Look into Gradle for compile. Allows for a more modular compilation process.
2. If you split the WAR file, you will need to use fairly standard web
development techniques to share security information across web apps. As a
general rule, you will need to store a session key in a cookie
Tim,
It is in scope if the GWT compilation is failing. If that is the case, what
flags are you using when doing the GWT compilation ? Are you setting the
heap/stack size on the JVM that runs the GWT compiler ?
David
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Timothy Spear n61...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
I was answering Rajin. I adjusted Eclipse startup and compile for more memory
to address my GWT out of memory issue. My GWT is not large enough to bother
doing more at this point.
I used Gradle on another project to reduce compile time and because of out of
memory issues, it allowed for
Without specifics of what may be referencing those objects it is hard to
say for sure, but memory details while running in dev mode will likely not
reflect the compiled code. To properly test your memory patterns, compile
to JavaScript with style PRETTY or DETAILED so you can read the code, and
You probably have to write your own SuggestBox oracle if multi word
matching is not what you want. A custom StreetNameOracle could also ask
your server to match the query string right in the database if you want to.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Miguel, creo que sería mejor que mostraras el código específico de uno de
los métodos que usaste para quizás poder ayudar a descifrar el problema. No
tengo ni idea de cuál será la solución, pero una posibilidad es que tu
código tenga fallas que alguno en este forum pueda ver una vez que
Hi Partners,
Hope you are doing good. Please have a look over the below position and
please send me your most updated resume ASAP….
*Job Title:** Salesforce.com System Analyst/Technology Lead*
*Location:** El Segundo, Los Angeles, US*
*Duration** : 6 months*
*Min IT Experience:** 10
same for me.
the problem is that I cannot even tell if this is the way it should be or
not.
another thing I've noticed is, that it takes very long if I refresh the
browser when the application is in dev-mode.
i.e. nothing is running - I start the debug mode in eclipse - takes about
10 secs
Hi!
We have the same issue but only on a single machine. A war bundle works on
my config but not for my collegue.
I'll compare the environments soon: Java, Tomcat, browser, language
settings, anything else that might be relevant?
Any ideas what causes this?
Best,
András
On Thursday, 18
I have a GWT project. Client code is located in the client dir. I want to
attach an external java classes (mainly DTO classes) that are in a external
project (directory). How to configure the gwt.xml file?
I get this kind of errors:
[ERROR] Errors in 'file:
I see no reason to split into separate WARs if your problem is with the GWT
Compilation: just compile your modules separately rather than with one call
to the GWT Compiler.
Which build tool are you using?
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:33:11 PM UTC+2,
raji...@infosmart-technologies.com
Hi,
I use GWT 2.5.1
I have at least theses configurations :
add-linker name=xsiframe /
set-configuration-property name='xsiframe.failIfScriptTag'
value=false /
set-property name=compiler.useSourceMaps value=true / --
- I would like to know if Source Map should work with the
Can somebody update the missing plugin page to recognize the IE11 user
agent string as IE11?
(IE11 preview is different from actual IE11)
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Matthew Dempsky mdemp...@google.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.comwrote:
You might want to add those instructions to the README file, for anyone
willing to hack on them.
(one issue with the current code, unless you fixed it recently, is that
it'll post Verified+1 / Verified-1 for old patchsets, in the event that you
posted a new patchset when the new one was being
I would tend to vote for option 2.
With option 1 nearly everyone will need to disable the ie10 permutation
anyways because not only own code must be updated but also 3rd party
libraries must provide updated rebind rules which may take some time. So I
think it feels better if ie10 is disabled
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
You might want to add those instructions to the README file, for anyone
willing to hack on them.
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5080/
(one issue with the current code, unless you fixed it recently, is that
Hi all,
I've just synchronized my master branch with the remote one and try to
build gwt by invoking ant but I receive the following error :
build.alldeps.jar:
compile:
-filter.props:
build:
compile:
precompile.modules:
[java] Loading inherited module 'com.google.gwt.core.Core'
I'll take a look
On Oct 23, 2013 8:00 AM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've just synchronized my master branch with the remote one and try to
build gwt by invoking ant but I receive the following error :
build.alldeps.jar:
compile:
-filter.props:
build:
ok John keep me inform. FYI, my environment seems to be correct (ant 1.9.2
with java 1.7) and the git history tells me that this class was modified
recently.
Thanks,
Julien
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM, John Stalcup stal...@google.com wrote:
I'll take a look
On Oct 23, 2013 8:00 AM,
It appears that runtime execution is resulting from trying to use the old
zero-args constructor when it should be using the new varargs constructor.
I think it's likely that you need to recompile the class files that refer
to ConditionAll/CompoundCondition etc.
does it work for you after an ant
ant clean has solved the problem !
Thanks,
Julien
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:15 PM, John Stalcup stal...@google.com wrote:
It appears that runtime execution is resulting from trying to use the old
zero-args constructor when it should be using the new varargs constructor.
I think it's likely
Hmm. It's a fair point. On the other hand, you don't *have* to upgrade
right away.
Hehe sure, but its hard to resist Java7, @GwtIncompatible support and
compiler/code splitting bug fixes ;-)
But maybe I misunderstood Matthew's post? I was under the impression that
with either solution 1
29 matches
Mail list logo
