Re: GWT 2.6.0-rc1 error compiling

2013-11-08 Thread Thomas Broyer
Are you sure you're using gwt-dev from 2.6.0-rc1 too? On Thursday, November 7, 2013 11:29:57 PM UTC+1, Patrick Tucker wrote: I just switched one of my maven projects to use the new RC and am getting the following error on compile: [INFO]Loading inherited module 'com.google.gwt.user.User'

Re: GWT 2.6.0-rc1 error compiling

2013-11-08 Thread Mark Donszelmann
Hi I have no direct dependency on gwt-dev, but the 2.5.1 maven get plugin refers to gwt-dev (and user and servlet) 2.5.1. Would that create the problem ? Is there a newer (published) version of this plugin ? Regards Mark On Nov 8, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: GWT 2.6.0-rc1 error compiling

2013-11-08 Thread Cristiano Costantini
try using the following config for gwt-maven-plugin to specify using also gwt's rc1 dependencies: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdgwt-maven-plugin/artifactId version${gwt.plugin.version}/version executions execution goals goalcompile/goal /goals /execution /executions

If a form posts sensitive data through a POST request, the server should return a 302 Object Moved response, to re-direct users to a different page

2013-11-08 Thread sanpo
hi, If a form posts sensitive data through a POST request, the server should return a 302 Object Moved response, to re-direct users to a different page. This avoids caching sensitive information. But my application returns Cache - POST Request Returns 200 OK Server Response. Is there anything

Re: GWT 2.6.0-rc1 error compiling

2013-11-08 Thread Patrick Tucker
Thanks! On Friday, November 8, 2013 7:14:49 AM UTC-5, Cristiano wrote: try using the following config for gwt-maven-plugin to specify using also gwt's rc1 dependencies: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId artifactIdgwt-maven-plugin/artifactId version${gwt.plugin.version}/version

Re: GWT 2.6.0-rc1 error compiling

2013-11-08 Thread Mark Donszelmann
Hi yes, that seems to work Thanks Mark On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Cristiano Costantini cristiano.costant...@gmail.com wrote: try using the following config for gwt-maven-plugin to specify using also gwt's rc1 dependencies: plugin groupIdorg.codehaus.mojo/groupId

Using Object in classes passed via GWT RPC

2013-11-08 Thread James Clough
I am trying to return the result of a calculation from an RPC call, and having trouble with the GWT compiler. Specifically, the class I am returning has a field of type Object in it. This field can contain: String, Integer, Double, Long, Boolean or Date. If I change the Object field to type

gwt 2.6.0-rc1 doesn't like package-info.java

2013-11-08 Thread Michael Hirsch
When I try to compile with 2.6.0-rc1, it complains about all of my package-info.java files. The files look like // Annotating the package declaration makes non-null the default for all // fields, methods, and parameters in all classes : @DefaultAnnotation(NonNull.class) package

gwt-2.6.0-rc1 can't compile guava-gwt

2013-11-08 Thread Michael Hirsch
When I compile my app with gwt-2.6.0-rc1, I get complaints about guava-gwt: [ERROR] Errors in

Re: GWT 2.6.0-rc1 error compiling

2013-11-08 Thread Thomas Broyer
FYI: http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/user-guide/using-different-gwt-sdk-version.html On Friday, November 8, 2013 2:08:40 PM UTC+1, Patrick Tucker wrote: Thanks! On Friday, November 8, 2013 7:14:49 AM UTC-5, Cristiano wrote: try using the following config for gwt-maven-plugin to

Re: SuggestBox and HasBlurHandlers

2013-11-08 Thread Patrick Tucker
You can listen to SelectionEvents, which fire when the user selects an item in the popup. If you want the user to be able to type in a value and not select an item I would also listen to ValueChangeEvents. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google

Re: Firefox in OS X freezes in DevMode.

2013-11-08 Thread Colin Alworth
Line 155: ssize_t n = recv(sock, readBuf, BUF_SIZE, 0); That seems to say 'block until bytes are written by the other end of the socket', or in other words, wait until the JVM is ready to go. Are you sure that the IDE isn't paused on a breakpoint, or that you have waited long enough for the

Changing css without recompiling

2013-11-08 Thread Aleks
Hi all, My problem is related to this blog post - http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com.au/2011/03/styling-and-skinning-your-apps-with.html. Namely, I have a gwt app, using UIBinder that I wish to be able to style without recompiling. I have a 'default' style that is defined in a css in

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: Branching GWT 2.6 later today

2013-11-08 Thread Li Bin
Is it possible for 2.6 to support IE11 in the final release ? Many thanks On Thursday, November 7, 2013 5:00:05 PM UTC+8, Daniel Kurka wrote: I think we still need to update the release notes: http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html Did we already track stuff that needs to go in

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: Branching GWT 2.6 later today

2013-11-08 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Li Bin ornot2...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible for 2.6 to support IE11 in the final release ? It's unclear to me what you mean by supporting IE11. If you know of issues between GWT and IE11, please report them at

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.6 and Java 6

2013-11-08 Thread Colin Alworth
I'm not yet convinced that this isn't either a) a workspace issue or b) a decision the community reached and I missed, but I figured I should stick it out there and see if someone can correct me. I've just brought our project up to date with GWT 2.6.0-rc1 from maven, and I can verify that the

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.6 and Java 6

2013-11-08 Thread Roberto Lublinerman
You should be able to invoke devmode with -sourceLevel 6. Roberto Lublinerman | Software Engineer | rlu...@google.com | 408-500-9148 On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not yet convinced that this isn't either a) a workspace issue or b) a decision the

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.6 and Java 6

2013-11-08 Thread Colin Alworth
Thanks Roberto, I'll give that a shot. I normally work with Java 7, but we want our code to work with anyone who chooses to use Java 6 as well - and I surmised that GWT had the same goal. Would it make sense to consider a warning indicating that the flag is needed with Java 6, or