Thanks Frank. It compiled. Now i need to test my app will work on IE 11 or
not ?
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 3:15:57 PM UTC+5:30, Frank Hossfeld wrote:
>
> gxt-2.3.1a-gwt22 will work with GWT 2.7.
>
> Am Donnerstag, 27. August 2015 08:04:27 UTC+2 schrieb Narasimhulu Bysani:
>>
>> Till today w
Hi
I have the similar kind of problem. But when it tries to install GWT for
IE, the plugin is not downloaded and something like this is showm
"To help protect the security of information you enter into this website,
the publisher of this content does not allow it to be displayed in a frame.
*W
​Thanks, I understand what you mean.
However, I feels awkward, and will not improve maintainability.
I get the feeling I am working around a bug.
The component facade is especially there to hide the component internals,
like the controller implementation, that is package protected and only
referenc
> > As your if-statement can not be evaluated to either true or false at
> compile time / static code analysis
> Hmmm interesting...
> Any idea how I can optimize this such that it's "left alone"? (I can't
> really think of one).
>
> What I do: the LoginController is created in a split point a
@Jens: thanks again for the quick response. Almost there I think
> As your if-statement can not be evaluated to either true or false at
compile time / static code analysis
Hmmm interesting...
Any idea how I can optimize this such that it's "left alone"? (I can't
really think of one).
What I d
With a debugger. :-) Server side code is just Java on a JVM, there's
nothing special about GWT on the server. There's very little of actual GWT
on the server side; if you're using GWT RPC then you'll have a server side
dependency for that protocol; if you're using more generic ways to access
@Jens: thanks.
> Personally I probably wouldn't have created a Total app,
Yes, I wanted to do the same, and for the short time, it's the best. But
seeing the coming feature requirements, I need to share info between the
apps while running next to each other.
Let's see how it goes, it's difficult t
> "One" more thing (sorry for asking so much):
> I noticed that my login component is contained in the left-over fragment
> instead of being exclusive to it's own splitpoint.
> The Soyc report shows that it's because it's referenced by the Account
> component that is loaded in another splitpoin
Am Dienstag, 1. September 2015 14:05:21 UTC+2 schrieb Ed:
>
> BTW: you think it's possible to define different split points per app
> build?
> Why? Declare and Ztoeslag build have both an initial download of about
> 400K, but in total the initial download is about 800K.
> So I think in Total I
"One" more thing (sorry for asking so much):
I noticed that my login component is contained in the left-over fragment
instead of being exclusive to it's own splitpoint.
The Soyc report shows that it's because it's referenced by the Account
component that is loaded in another splitpoint. The Account
BTW: you think it's possible to define different split points per app build?
Why? Declare and Ztoeslag build have both an initial download of about
400K, but in total the initial download is about 800K.
So I think in Total I would like to have less split points in Declare and
Ztoeslag to reduce the
@Jens: thanks a lot for al the insight.
I thought I understand it, but apparently not.
I did some reading and started to optimize thinks, like the thinks you
suggested and reviewing my split points. I think I can merge some of them
such that some code becomes exclusive to that split point that will
In this case I think it is best you just use the project from Alain.
Since it is opensource you could make the changes in that library and let
Alain pull them back into the main project.
When doing this there will be an up to date googlemaps wrapper available
for others to use, which is a good
13 matches
Mail list logo
