Re: Closure compiler removal ?

2016-06-10 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
Another question related to that. How can be integrated closure optimization in the build after that? On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 at 16:32 Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > According to this: > https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/15110/ > > The -XenableClosudeCompiler option will be removed from GWT 2.8. Thi

Closure compiler removal ?

2016-06-10 Thread Hristo Stoyanov
According to this: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/15110/ The -XenableClosudeCompiler option will be removed from GWT 2.8. This impacts Cradle And Maven plugins. I also have 2 question: 1. Is specifying -optimte 9 good enough to be the only one left? 2. The reason for the removal states t

Any way to apply a prefix to CssResources globally?

2016-06-10 Thread David Becker
You can apply prefixes to a CssResource when @Import-ing with the @ImportedWithPrefix("foobar") annotation; or when using the "obfuscated" style you can set CssResource.obfuscationPrefix="foobar-". But, I would also like to apply the foobar- prefix (even when not importing) and when using the

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

2016-06-10 Thread Thomas Broyer
Also, it addresses Filipe's issue, but Hristo's one is different (and if you ask me, not actually a problem with GWT; not until proven otherwise): why does a javadoc task look at source files in gwt-user? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users"

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

2016-06-10 Thread David Becker
The code review link Roberto mentioned says it's still under review and hasn't been merged yet. -.. .- ...- .. -.....-... . -.-. -.- . .-. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > Thanks Roberto, > Just a to confirm that the issue is still with us - i did a new build a

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

2016-06-10 Thread Hristo Stoyanov
Thanks Roberto, Just a to confirm that the issue is still with us - i did a new build a few seconds ago. On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 10:55:26 PM UTC-7, Roberto Lublinerman wrote: > > The error messages were introduced by mistake in the JSNI error reporting > fix (https://gwt-review.googlesource

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

2016-06-10 Thread Kirill Prazdnikov
Hi Performance also matters. We build the clint for 3 platforms: iOS, Android, GWT. Storing data in nio.Buffers has HUGE performance impact on mobile platforms. I see no problem with java->C++ interop with byte[] and float[] for mobile platforms (RoboVM, Android) and desktop. I can do the sa

Adding a new fonctionnality on a legacy CheckBox

2016-06-10 Thread 129pierre
Hi, I still have a problem with my wrapped SimpleCheckBox. I used : SimpleCheckBoxcb = SimpleCheckBox.wrap(Document.get().getElementById("idCb")); for getting a checkbox configured on a legacy server application that I cannot change. This CheckBox has already a fonctionnaly "A" from the serv

Re: NPAPI-Plug-in

2016-06-10 Thread Frank
As Thomas said you should use SuperDevMode. More information (although it seems a little outdated) can be found here : http://www.gwtproject.org/articles/superdevmode.html On a side note. Some pageson the GWT-Project need an URGENT udpate : http://www.gwtproject.org/gettingstarted.html --> Us

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

2016-06-10 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 11:12:27 AM UTC+2, Kirill Prazdnikov wrote: > > Hi Thomas > > Lets forget about java.util, what about simple arrays ? > > It seems that we already have java [] array -> JS Array marshalling. > And It would be very nice if we had these type of marshalling with zero >

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

2016-06-10 Thread Kirill Prazdnikov
Hi Thomas Lets forget about java.util, what about simple arrays ? It seems that we already have java [] array -> JS Array marshalling. And It would be very nice if we had these type of marshalling with zero performance penalty: java byte[] -> Int8ArrayNative java short[] -> Int16ArrayNative

GWT Material - Video tutorial #1

2016-06-10 Thread mark kevin ringor
We've just released our gwt-material first video tutorial - Project Setup using gwt-material-archetype with Eclipse IDE and Intelij IDEA. Also during weeked we will do some shooting to provide the next tutorial series. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEVqfqDUOpE -- You received this message b

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

2016-06-10 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
Hi all, I have already stated that I also believe it is not possible - but as a thought experiment I believe it would be possible if the two statements below could hold: 1) The implementations of java.util.List (isNative=true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Array") (and all other types) c

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

2016-06-10 Thread Thomas Broyer
Except that there is NO marshaling! There are so many cases where it just won't work that it's not even worth trying if you ask me.You need to think about isNative vs. "exported" types, method return values vs. parameters vs. fields (which can be both get and set); object identities (calling t

NPAPI-Plug-in

2016-06-10 Thread Thomas Broyer
Technically, you can make it work on very old versions of Firefox (24) and Chrome (can't remember the version, maybe 40, depends on the platform too). It still works in IE though. But DevMode is deprecated and is likely to be entirely removed just after GWT 2.8, so it really is not worth the has