Put the line to set the configuration property after
inheriting com.google.gwt.uibinder.UiBinder, which you're probably
inheriting indirectly by way of com.google.gwt.user.User.
-- Brian
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
T
he regular, initWidget() method of Composite.
>
> Your UiBinder template then just looks like this:
>
>
>
> Stuff.
>
>
>
> // To use:
> CustomDialog dialog = new CustomDialog();
> // etc.
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Brian Reilly wrote:
&g
I've had issues with positioning (specifically centering) when setting
dimensions of the popup contents using CSS (width in my case, but I imagine
hight could have similar issues). My dialog box would be positioned too far
to the right the first time is was displayed using center(). The second a
I've found that you can add a visible="false" attribute to the g:DialogBox
tag to keep it from being displayed on page load. However, I think this will
cause the dialog box UI to be constructed even if it's never displayed.
I'm guessing that the "you're not supposed to do this" comment you're
r
on with GWT 2.3 for a couple of months now.
-- Brian
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Brian Reilly wrote:
> Note that the current build is for GWT <= 2.1. If you're using 2.2+,
> currently you'll need to get the source and build it against 2.2+ yourself.
>
> I did some
I think this is a known bug. I saw it mentioned recently and thought that
there was a new issue filed, however I couldn't find it. I did however find
this older issue:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5760
that appears to be related.
-- Brian
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at
Note that the current build is for GWT <= 2.1. If you're using 2.2+,
currently you'll need to get the source and build it against 2.2+ yourself.
I did some work a couple of months ago to create a jar that would work for
any version of GWT, but haven't committed it yet. In fact, that's the only
rea
Try adding a call to resources.css.ensureInjected(). I've seen that problem
before and I think the call ensureInjected() fixed it.
-- Brian
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Lars wrote:
> So, I've had success using UiBinder to declare styles in blocks
> and then accessing them in my .java file
A tooltip is something that you generally only have one of on the screen at
at time, so you could have a single DecoratedPopupPanel as a sibling of the
TabLayoutPanel. Then, create a tooltip event that you fire from a handler on
the TextBox to either show/position or hide the tooltip, but also hide
To reiterate, GWT does not have a "native" MVP framework. Activities and
Places are not directly related to MVP. The documentation is misleading on
this point and, as David said, they're working on correcting that.
Some things to keep in mind:
1. MVP is a pattern. How that pattern is applied depe
That seems like very odd behavior and an unlikely bug to have crept in
without being detected.
It sounds like this started happening after upgrading to a new version of
GWT. Make sure you don't have multiple versions of GWT jars on your
classpath when running development mode. Also, does it work i
Look at the CellTable example in the Showcase application:
http://gwt.google.com/samples/Showcase/Showcase.html#!CwCellTable
The source code is viewable from that page as well.
-- Brian
2011/6/14 NANOUS :
> Bonjour,
>
> Comment je peut ajouter un ActionListener à une grid ,sachant que
> ce
I think you're almost there. It looks like you're trying to use a
ListDataProvider, but you're also calling setRowCount() and
setRowData() which you don't need to do when using a ListDataProvider.
In terms of sorting, your ListHandler is configured to act on the same
list that the ListDataProvider
If you want to style all of the Label widgets that are inside a
specific container (e.g. HTMLPanel), you can put a class on the
container add a rule to target labels inside of it.
@external .gwt-Label;
.container .gwt-Label {
color: #000;
}
This text will be styled by static style
Have you recently moved to a newer version of GWT? The errors look
vaguely like the kinds of errors that 3rd party libraries ran into
when GWT 2.2 was released. However, I don't see any 3rd party packages
listed in the stack trace. My best guess is that you may have multiple
versions of the GWT jar
You need to work on your AvailabilityLocator implementation. Your
implementation of getVersion() is returning null, which is exactly
what the error message is telling you. Also, your implementation of
find() isn't doing what it should, getIdType() is returning null
(should return Long.class in this
Hmm... maybe @UiFactory won't work in this case. I looked at the docs
again and it looks like passing constructor parameters is possible
when using @UiConstructor, but I don't see anything about passing
parameters to @UiFactory methods. Try the @UiField(provided=true)
approach instead. Just be care
I think that @UiField(provided=true) and @UiFactory are two different
ways to get the same effect in this case. The smallest change to get
your code to work would be to remove provided=true from your @UiField
annotation. As it is, you're effectively telling UI Binder to not try
to create a Tree for
It's unclear why you can't use RequestFactory for your project. If you
haven't already, read over
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html
at least once. Then, especially if your current entities do not have
id and version properties, create and experiment with a sam
I think this is purely a Google Plugin for Eclipse feature that you'll
benefit from if you use Eclipse to interface with AppEngine, Google
Project Hosting, etc. As such, it has nothing to do with implementing
SSO in your application (GWT or otherwise). I haven't tried using it,
but if you install t
guess that the RF is trying to recreate the
> collection using a hashcode based on the id of the proxy, which doesn't
> exist for a ValueProxy.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Brian Reilly
> wrote:
>>
>> This sounds like a problem that
This sounds like a problem that I ran into this as well, and even had
a chance to sit down with David Chandler at Google I/O to look over
it. Your case is more straightforward than mine (which involved trying
to add to a Set on fetched ValueProxy) but I'd bet it's the same
problem. I'm planning to
I'll second Jeff's statement. It was a great experience, and I was
glad there was enough GWT/DevTools content to keep me busy. It was
also great to get a chance to meet some of the GWT team and other GWT
developers.
-- Brian
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:46 PM, nino ekambi
wrote:
> Nice David.
> D
As I understand it, the main benefit to using Places/Activities is
history/URL management. Therefore, the first question is do you want
users to be able to save a URL directly to the detail popup? I think
it might be a little odd from the user's point of view, but that's
entirely up to you. If you
Agreed, though it's too bad that it doesn't appear to have a chapter
about RequestFactory. I experimented with it recently and it's pretty
neat, though the GWT documentation isn't nearly as clear as it is for
GWT-RPC.
-- Brian
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Jan Mostert wrote:
> When will this
I may be interested as well. I don't know a lot about the area, so all
I can suggest is Thirsty Bear, which is on Howard St. a block over
from Moscone East.
-Brian
On May 5, 1:56 pm, Jeff Larsen wrote:
> Hey was wondering if there is any interest in a gwt get together on Monday
> night in SF.
>
This is such a basic need for any GWT application. It would be really
helpful if a simple servlet filter like this was provided with GWT. In
fact, I just submitted a feature request:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6288
-- Brian
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:36 PM, SrArc
Yes, the declaration of your UiBinder interface is important for
understanding the problem. Make sure the 2nd type parameter is your
view implementation class and not, for example, an interface that your
view implements. I've seen NullPointerExceptions like you describe
when a view interface is use
Not a GWT-specific question, but you are using canvas through GWT, so...
You're doing well by using pre-rendered images and drawing them to
your main screen. In some of my initial experiments using canvas, I
was using the canvas drawing functions (lines, arcs, etc.). I got a
large speed boost by p
You're probably running into the issue with the latest JDK from Apple. See:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6125
and especially
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4712
-Brian
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Johannes Lehmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
There was an announcement just yesterday of a visualization library,
Protovis-GWT.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/6857b43f4563a335
It looked pretty nice from the examples. I haven't looked at the API
yet, though.
-Brian
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Ro
Like inline-block, there's also inline-table. I'm not sure how good
browser support is for these (I'm looking at you, IE6). If
inline-table works, you don't need the wrapper SimplePanel. If
inline-table doesn't work but inline-block does, then use the wrapper
SimplePanel.
The other option is to fl
> now when I compile individual modules, I get [ERROR] Module has no entry
> points defined.
> I understand this is because only one of my modules has the EntryPoint.
>
> do you know how I can get around this problem ?
> - do you think the only solution is to define a dummy EntryPoint, to make
>
I would also recommend Hamlet D'Arcy's short screencast:
http://hamletdarcy.blogspot.com/2011/02/screencast-gwt-event-bus-basics.html
He uses it in the context of MVC controllers, but the same idea
applies to presenters.
-Brian
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Juan Pablo Gardella
wrote:
>
> I haven't worked with Groovy/Scala and Maven. Are you saying
> Groovy/Scala code is supposed to go in src/main/resources? That would
> indeed be strange.
Generally, no. Groovy (and maybe Scala too) is a little bit of an
unusual case because (I think) you don't actually have to compile the
source
>> There's a deeper question there: are UiBinder ui.xml, LocalizableResources
>> properties, ClientBundle css, images, etc. "resources" or "sources"?
>
> From Maven's point of view: yes, they are resources, not sources.
> Sources contain source code (i.e. Java code).
Java code is just one example.
Found this issue from a comment in the code review you referenced:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5247
One of the issue comments points to a library that someone created to
help work around this:
http://showsort.darkhelm.org/fdoc/
I'd suggest starring the i
I have run into this. It may depend on how you start development mode.
I use either maven or IntelliJ IDEA; they may have put some extra
effort into the Eclipse plugin to make it work there, but I'm not
sure.
One workaround that I know of it to use ClientBundle/CssResource. See
http://code.google.
First, one idea about the original question. You might be able to get
away with adding src/main/resources as a source folder in the Eclipse
project if it isn't already. It's been a while since I've used
Eclipse; I don't know if that would be enough to make the GEP happy.
If calling src/main/resour
> given (client and webapp are two distinct maven project with their own
> pom.xml),
> which of the solutions below is the correct way for resolving dependency,
> given the assumptions in previous posts (multi-module gwt project)
> 1- copy assembled zip file from client project directory, to webapp
> Hi,
> so is this the correct approach for it http://tinypic.com/r/236vq0/7 ?
>
> When the Activity is created it gets the instance of the view and
> creates a new presenter. It binds these two together. When the
> activity is stopped (by place change) the presenter has to be set to
> null.
That
lenge with its
>> implementation though(using the Ray Ryan's method). How do I use the
>> go() method to serve multiple views if its local type is of
>> HasWidgets?
>>
>> On 3/1/11, Erik Bens wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > perfect overview - th
Very good article! Thank you for contributing it!
I would be interested to hear from creators/users of the MVP
frameworks out there (gwt-mvp, gwt-platform, gwt-presenter, mvp4g,
etc.) about which approach is used in each of the frameworks or if the
frameworks are approach-agnostic.
-Brian
On Tue
I believe you would have to add @Inject annotations to your
constructors. If you don't, developers using the framework can always
hand-code a factory of some sort (Provider in Guice/GIN) to create
instances (the factory gets dependencies injected into it so that it
can inject them into the objects
Apparently, something like this will work:
.cellTableFirstColumn.cellTableKeyboardSelectedRowCell {
...
}
Note that there's no space between the selectors. I haven't tested it
at all, let alone with CellTable, but The Internet says this works...
except in IE6, of course.
Another suggestion I s
It looks like gwt-log uses deferred binding for optimization to
eliminate any logging code that's lower than the configured logging
threshold. Personally, I would not use deferred binding for your use
case.
By accepting a datasource as a constructor parameter, you're set up
perfectly for dependenc
I'll have to look into maven to see if that can be done, but I'm not
too optimistic that it would work very well.
Is there a gwt.version property that we can check inside the
generate-with tag of the library's module XML? Theoretically, a
library could then provide two classes in a single
Thank you for formally addressing this issue, David.
I notice that GIN 1.5 distributes 2 jars, one each for pre- and post-
GWT 2.2. I haven't looked into it yet but, from a library developer's
point of view, is there any hope of being able to distribute a single
jar that will work in either case?
If you use Development Mode, you don't have to recompile to see most
client-side changes. See
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCompilingAndDebugging.html#DevGuideDevMode
-Brian
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Jiunarayan wrote:
> I find annoying in compiling the whole gwt pro
I don't think this is a case where I would think of using either
deferred binding or GIN. The API you outlined should work as is for
anyone who can write their own datasource. For users who can only
provide a URL to the data, they can use your HttpDataSource or a more
specific subclass of HttpDataS
The server is what's in common and must be the keeper of time. If
you're worried about latency making timings inaccurate, there are much
bigger potential problems with making the clients keep track of time.
For example, assuming you have some unique token for that match on the
URL, what happens if
Here's my feedback. Sorry it's so long. I have quite a few comments
about the tendency toward using various blue colors. I'm not entirely
against that, but I think the blues should be consistent. That said,
I'd rather have no color and be able to easily add color if desired.
That way, the default s
Take a look at gwt-multipage
(http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/). It allows you to annotate
entry points to be invoked based on either a URL pattern or a token
stored in a javascript variable. It also uses GWT.runAsync() to
download only the entry point to run on that page.
One warning... th
Unfortunately, GWT 2.2 introduced an incompatibility for many
libraries that rely on code generators. This includes the
gwt-google-apis project, GIN, and at least one other that I know of.
The only solution I know of right now is to compile your own versions
of these libraries against GWT 2.2.
Eve
s("^[0-9A-Z\\.]{1,10}$")) {
> Window.alert("'" + symbol + "' is not a valid symbol.");
> newSymbolTextBox.selectAll();
> return;
> }
>
> newSymbolTextBox.setText("");
>
> // TODO Don't add the stock if it's already in the t
The core objects need to be GWT-compiled along with and at the same
time as the rest of the GWT application. Therefore the source needs to
be available to the GWT compiler. From what I've heard, you should be
able to package the source files (and the .gwt.xml file) in the core
jar and the compiler
Make sure you have a gwt.codesvr query parameter on the URL. Otherwise
your development mode server won't be used. Then, as long as you have
a debugger attached to your development mode process, you should be
able to debug client side code.
Note that any RPC calls will be handled by server that th
One implication that you'll have is the possible increase of
compilation units in your applications. Since each of the host pages
would show something different, you'd have one entry point for each.
Since you don't want to download and start all of the entry points
when you're only using one, you'l
When the user logs in, store something in the HttpSession. Then, when
the next page loads and your entry point is invoked, make a GWT-RPC
call to check the session to see if the user is logged in and who they
are. You can access the session from a GWT-RPC service implementation
(subclass of Abstrac
Check out gwt-multipage (http://code.google.com/p/gwt-multipage/). It
works using a single entry point configured in the module XML and can
dispatch to other entry points based on a URL pattern or javascript
token (pretty much exactly what Jerome posted).
-Brian
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:15 AM, I
gt;
>
> On Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:38:54 PM UTC+1, Brian Reilly wrote:
>>
>> What I was hoping for in 2.1.1 is something with, I suppose, the
>> functionality of AutoBean and the simplicity of use of @ProxyFor.
>> Unless I'm missing something about AutoBean, it looks
What I was hoping for in 2.1.1 is something with, I suppose, the
functionality of AutoBean and the simplicity of use of @ProxyFor.
Unless I'm missing something about AutoBean, it looks too cumbersome
to use outside of a tool that does code generation.
In my case, I don't need a proxy for my entiti
It's a bit more complicated than that, and you really have to look at
the provided example in IE7 (not IE8, which works fine) to understand
what's happening.
>From what I understand, you want to have 2 widgets, a text field and a
button, displayed in a row. Your layout is fluid, so the width of th
Are you using RootPanel or RootLayoutPanel? If RootPanel, are you
targeting a specific element in your host HTML page? I could imagine
some usage of these causing some of the effects you're describing.
-Brian
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Bauer wrote:
> This is an odd issue. What is happenin
FlowPanel renders as a div, which has a default width of 100%. The
only block-level element I'm aware of that shrinks horizontally to fit
its content is a table. You can try using display: table; on the div,
but you'll have trouble with IE support. You may just have to use an
actual table to get th
ed the elements
> it wanted to keep together, then added 'new HTML ("")', and
> those items would all stay together within the Cell. Yes?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
> On Nov 30, 1:55 pm, Brian Reilly wrote:
>> First, let's separate two conce
Yes, but only the subset that the framework supports. You just
happened to hit one of the classes that is missing. See
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/RefJreEmulation.html.
-Brian
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:12 AM, dato.java wrote:
>
> Using J2SE classes inside GWT client modul
Great that this support has been added. Disappointing that, at least
on Mac OS X (10.5), everything takes about twice as long as in Safari
or Firefox.
-Brian
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Peter Ondruska wrote:
> http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/12/announcing-chrome-developer-plugin.ht
You do have to declare the servlet in the web.xml of the main module.
As such, you have to treat it like it's in the main module. I suspect
the "metro.module.rpcpack" part of the url-pattern is the problem. The
URL pattern is determined by the main module name, not the inherited
module name or the
What do you think is the best way for ContainingPresenter get an
instance of WidgetView? I think that either:
1. WidgetView needs to be an interface and ContainingPresenter is
given a factory/provider for creating them
2. ContainingPresenter doesn't reference WidgetView at all
One of the main ben
Greg,
As I mentioned in a thread earlier today (
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/82a98103dfa76528),
try using a KeyDownEvent handler and inspect
event.getNativeEvent().getKeyCode()
instead of event.getCharCode().
>From the other thread, it sounds like this b
Greg,
For what it's worth, I had very similar feelings when I ran into a very
similar problem. (I was trying to get consistent behavior when pressing
enter or tab. Tab is a tricky one because different browsers do different
things with different events to handle element focus. Hint: in Safari, you
As much as I like GWT, I think it might not be the right tool for your
situation.
Your two use cases are:
* Remote data and compute
* Local data and compute (unless you meant that desktop use would use remote
compute, but I don't think so because that would require transmitting local
data to the
naming the existing
AbstractActivity to Activity.
It sounds like there are other breaking changes coming in 2.1.1. I'm curious
to know what they are...
-Brian
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Brian Reilly wrote:
> There's a difference between "experimental" and "imm
I fiddled with this quite a bit a while back, and I just upgraded to 2.1 so
I panicked when I read this. However, I just tested in Safari and Firefox
(both on Mac) and everything still works.
The key, as Dominic mentioned, is to handle KEY_ENTER in a handler for
KeyDownEvent instead of KeyPressEve
>
> >>That's the exact use case for FilteredActivityMapper and
> >>CachingActivityMapper (and how they're used AFAICT in "scaffold"
> >>applications generated by String Roo for the "master" activities).
>
Thanks for the confirmation, Thomas. I felt like it was a bit cumbersome to
use, but it makes
I haven't done this in a real project yet, but I was experimenting with
something similar. I think I was able to get this kind of behavior by
wrapping the ActivityMapper implementation in a CachingActivityMapper and
wrapping that in a FilteredActivityMapper. The idea is that the filtered
activity m
; http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/2173bd71a6289c84
>
> I am going to start working on a new project, and I'm afraid based on
> Ray Ryan's comment, GWT 2.1 MVP is too experimental,
> and there is a very high risk that GWT 2.2 would be dramatica
an operable
> FlowPanel, since all the ways of binding them together involve Block
> Elements? (Or is there a way of sticking two Widgets together (other
> than a custom widget), that doesn't use a block element?)
>
> Greg
>
> On Nov 30, 12:06 pm, Brian Reilly wrot
The fact that the Activities and Places documentation is under the heading
"MVP Framework" in the GWT documentation and contains statements like "An *
activity* in GWT 2.1 is analogous to a presenter in MVP terminology"
(recently discussed in another thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-we
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Greg Dougherty wrote:
> I have created a FlowPanel that contains 4 ListBoxes and a button. I
> wanted to put some space between the items, so I added empty
> HorizontalPanels (with padding: 3px;) as spacers in between each
> item. FlowPanel responded by placing
I'd create a separate HTML file that hosts the application module (or a
different module). You can inspect the URL and/or history token as
appropriate to decide what widget to view and any data you may need to
preload it with. The trick then is that I assume you'd want to communicate
events back to
Another option would be to look at a 3rd party framework. As Thomas pointed
out, the GWT team isn't trying to address every use case, and that's where
pulling in other frameworks can help. There's no shame in recognizing that
you have a complex use case and using any tools available to help. I have
Ashton,
It's good that you're doing this. I think we need some good examples of how
to put together a GWT application using GWT 2.0/2.1 features, GIN, etc.
I took a quick look at some of the code (still planning to look more) and I
have a couple of comments.
* I almost did the same thing as you
This is going to be a recurring question here and the source of much
frustration for anyone who doesn't ask or read this group. It would be nice
if someone would update that piece of the documentation.
-Brian
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:35 PM, Ashton Thomas wrote:
>
> http://groups.google.com/gro
a. The final product should only contain what is actually used in the final
module being compiled. However, I think you may experience longer
compilation times if there is a lot of code not being used. I've heard
stories of people seeing huge differences in compilation when inheriting
incubator mod
It should work fine. Just make sure that the URL that you point your
selenium test at contains the gwt.codesvr query parameter.
-Brian
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Andrey wrote:
> That doesn't work. My question is: how should we run selenium in dev
> mode?
>
> On Sep 16, 6:13 pm, András Csá
Right. ui:style src looks for local CSS files relative to the .ui.xml
file. I think you have 2 options:
1. Load the font on the host page.
2. Add a stylesheet to your GWT module that includes this line:
@import url(http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lobster);
As described in the "Advance
Could you get the same effect by preventing user input during your
server request, either by finding all of the controls/links and
disabling them or overlaying something that receives and swallows all
events? At least that way, you're not locking up the browser
completely. Is there some other funct
It looks like some doc content isn't being displayed. I happened to go
to com.extjs.gxt.ui.client.widget.Label and viewed the source and say
a block. However it's not showing up in the app anywhere that I
could see.
-Brian
On Jul 16, 3:17 am, Abraham Elias wrote:
> We're very excited to share t
I don't know about addPause, but I think that DeferredCommand is
primarily for cases where you need to do something with the DOM before
it's actually available. For example, you can put a setFocus call in a
DeferredCommand block before the element that's receiving focus has
been added to the DOM (a
The other thing that I was just reminded of from another post is to
make sure that you're using the appropriate root panel. Specifically,
again if you're using layout panels, you need to use a
RootLayoutPanel.
-Brian
On Jul 11, 10:33 am, Brian Reilly wrote:
> It would help
It would help to know what specifically you were trying to do (there
are a lot of different layouts on the page you linked to) and how it
wasn't working for you. One common mistake that people make when
starting out with layout panels is not using standards mode. It's
documented on that page, but y
Assuming the GUI library you mentioned is a GWT module, the easiest
thing to do is to reference the CSS file from the module definition
file:
Then make sure that Library.css is in a package named "public" next to
the module definition file. The CSS will then be automatically loaded
when the
You could also check out gwt-multipage (http://code.google.com/p/gwt-
multipage/) which basically does this type of switching, but it
generates the switching code for you based on annotated entry points.
You can switch based on a URL pattern (and hopefully soon by a
javascript token variable... and
entirely
new application where GWT is the primary framework, which will be
reasonably easy to do. The other way to look at it is that there's no
way we could adopt GWT at all if we weren't able to take this
incremental approach.
-Brian
On Jun 17, 3:14 am, Stefan Bachert wrote:
>
This is a technique that I'm finding useful for using GWT to implement
new features in an existing web application. The application already
has a configuration-driven menu system that effectively resolves to a
separate HTML file for each page. If I want to use GWT to implement
new pages, I need to
Also this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/3886f3c851bdefdc
On Jun 10, 9:33 am, Brian Reilly wrote:
> This is being discussed in another thread:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/threa...
>
> -Brian
&
This is being discussed in another thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/e4e2694eba39f93d
-Brian
On Jun 8, 11:07 am, matthew jones wrote:
> Anyone else having this issue?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Go
I've had good luck with the second (non-invasive) approach. A coworker
of mine implemented the first (using Spring MVC) approach and it did
work for the most part. However, we aren't otherwise using Spring MVC
and don't have any broad expertise in it, so I was initially confused
when looking at it.
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
