Great!!! Excited to get to try JSInterop , albeit experimential
Am Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 11:59:06 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Kurka:
>
> Today we are excited to announce the GWT 2.7.0 release. Thanks to
> everyone who contributed to this release, especially our non-Google open
> source contrib
Hi
is it possible to override the deferred binding configuration of a inherit
module?
Here is a example:
In the module, I want to use, a deferred binding is declared as follows
moduleA.gwt.xml:
The declaration says: Use A1Impl class as default and A2Impl class, if
prop
I just tried doing it with annotations and it seems to work well.
@RunWith(Suite.class)
@Suite.SuiteClasses({
// adding GWTTestCases to suite
SomeGwtTest01.class,
SomeGwtTest02.class,
})
public class JUnit4GWTTestsSuite {
}
cheers Chris
Am Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011
Am Freitag, 16. November 2012 21:08:16 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas Broyer:
>
>
> Le 16 nov. 2012 17:59, "Daniel Kurka" >
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > I have been out on devoxx and haven`t had time to cast a vote yet.
> >
> > I think its a good idea to go with a separate package like
> src/m
I am not quite sure why super-sources should / must be treated differently?
Back i am probably lacking experience and knowledge here
I like the notion the *gwt.xml files are actuallly part of the sources and
not resources for gwt libraries.
So that would be Option 1, without understandin
Appreciate you guys great work! Thanx!
Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2012 09:59:55 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Broyer:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:27:24 AM UTC+2, Christoph Henrici wrote:
>>
>> Forgot to ask: the patch will be in a upcoming version?
>>>
&
Forgot to ask: the patch will be in a upcoming version?
Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2012 09:26:51 UTC+2 schrieb Christoph Henrici:
>
> Works perfectly. Thank you very much. ufff i'm glad: less code for
> us!
>
>
> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012 19:42:06 UTC+2
Works perfectly. Thank you very much. ufff i'm glad: less code for us!
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012 19:42:06 UTC+2 schrieb Manuel Carrasco:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Christoph Henrici
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Great!
>> Sorry i don
tself does'nt
carried the changes?
Am Montag, 8. Oktober 2012 16:38:11 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Broyer:
>
>
> On Monday, October 8, 2012 4:20:46 PM UTC+2, Christoph Henrici wrote:
>>
>> Probably very trivial, but i have searched the Group and havn't found
>>
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2012 12:59:19 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Broyer:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 9:03:35 AM UTC+2, Christoph Henrici wrote:
>>
>> Best thanx. Szenario 1, would mean that you have to deal with two
>> different sets of data structures onli
ouple of months ago which should fix your issue
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1764804/
>
> It should be nice if you could test the fix with your projects and give
> feedback.
>
> - Manolo
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Christoph Henrici
>
> &g
(domainClass);
where InterfaceUtils is application specific.
Not quite sure of the approach seems lots of code copied for one little
change ... ;-/ ?
Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012 11:22:34 UTC+2 schrieb Christoph Henrici:
>
> By default it seems to me that EntityProxies can'
Best thanx. Szenario 1, would mean that you have to deal with two
different sets of data structures online = entityproxies and offline
something else. or you have to develop your "own" layer above request
factory which to avoid was the rational behind using requestfactory.
Szenario 2
What be the best approach to develop a offline capable Application using
ReqeustFactory? By Storing Request on locally on the Device and firing
later when online? Or is RequestFactory not recommendable to use, if
offline capability is a requirement?
Best Thanx for any advice.
Christoph
Probably very trivial, but i have searched the Group and havn't found
anything. How are Server generated Values propagated back to the
EntityProxies, specially also the Id values of newly created and inserted
Objects.
Can anybody help?
--
You received this message because you are subscri
.
Generally i think it would be a good idea to be able to map Proxies to
Domain Interfaces, or am i missing something?
Is there a way of achieving this?
Christoph
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view t
Do specializations of the RequestContext interface support generic methods
in the following form:
public Request> query(String typeUniqueId);
with a Server Interface like:
public List query(String typeUniqueId);
It doesn't look like since our testcase throws an exception of the
following
Hello,
I have same issue!
a gwt-maven project with gwt 2.2 and the designer.
But I don't have any solution for this.
Christoph
On 17 Feb., 07:33, skalimer0 wrote:
> GWT Designer 2.2 don't work with a gwt-maven project.
>
> I have this error for all file opening :
>
Hi,
i'm trying out the new GWT2.0 Layout Panels
(DockLayoutPanel,SplitLayoutPanel,...).
But there is no default style as you can see in the demo screenshots?
Do I miss something ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to
Ubuntu.
Cheers,
Christoph
On 9 Nov., 21:39, Christoph Breidert wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I had Eclipse 3.4 and GWT running perfectly under Ubuntu 9.04.
>
> Since I updated Ubuntu to the latest version 9.10 I cannot start the
> hosted mode browser any more. It just starts bri
-1.9.1.4/libxul.so: undefined symbol:
PR_GetPhysicalMemorySize
The error tells me nothing, googling also does not bring anything that
makes sense to me. If anybody has an idea or hint it would be
appreciated, I have spent too much time and headbanging on this.
Cheers and thx, Christoph
Hello,
I have a question concerning async calls on a server.
We have developed a small web application with some async calls to a
server and database.
However the problem is that when the application is deployed on a
server the calls do not work. On the local machine everything works
fine and i
Hello Paul,
I solved the problem by making the RPC calls.
Best regards
christoph
On Jul 6, 9:27 am, Paul Grenyer wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> > I'm working on a web application using Google Web Toolkit (GWT). This
> > application should have some mailing functionality. Th
rch I figured out that I have to inherit another
module into by modifying the XML file. The problem is simply that I
can't figure out how to name the module correct.
Is there someone who can help in order to solve the issue.
Best regards
Christoph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
e, in topics like sessions,
> transactions, and others.
>
> I don't have experience with the integration of the 3, but I starting to
> learn about that.
>
> 2009/2/11 Christoph
>
>
>
>
>
> > We have a Tomcat-based GWT application that we are looking to scale.
Spring give us over integrating Hibernate without
Spring?
If it makes sense to integrate with Spring, what features of Spring
should we use?
Thanks,
Christoph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Googl
26 matches
Mail list logo
