Re: GWT 2.7.0 Compile Errors

2016-11-10 Thread David Becker
GXT is available under both a commercial and GPL license. Details can be found here: https://www.sencha.com/legal/#Sencha_GXT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

[gwt-contrib] Re: Proposed LauncherDir change, add template bindAddress replacement

2016-10-12 Thread David Becker
A while back -bindAddress 0.0.0.0 was changed in GWT 2.8 to use the actual IP address instead of a local hostname to work better when operating in an environment where the local hostname isn't recognized by the client (specifically, things like windows tablets don't seem to recognize the mac

Re: Troubleshooting compilation issues?

2016-10-03 Thread David Becker
fixed now. Thank you all for your suggestions! On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 1:45:02 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote: > > The profile entries that pointed to JavaScriptException in obfuscated > output now points to a lambda in detailed output, so I think that's a red > herring. I c

Re: Troubleshooting compilation issues?

2016-10-03 Thread David Becker
additional suggestions? On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 10:42:38 AM UTC-7, David Becker wrote: > > I'm not getting anything on the console logs and I've verified that I've > got an uncaught exception handler set. However, when I profile during this > frozen state, all profile entries

Re: Troubleshooting compilation issues?

2016-10-03 Thread David Becker
:34:17 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote: > > I'll do some more diagnostics on it come Monday. > > Thanks for the advice... > > On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Mike Warne <mike.wa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do you have any JavaScript exceptions in your browser console? >

Re: Troubleshooting compilation issues?

2016-10-01 Thread David Becker
I'll do some more diagnostics on it come Monday. Thanks for the advice... On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Mike Warne wrote: > Do you have any JavaScript exceptions in your browser console? Sometimes > an exception will cause important code to be skipped, causing your app

Re: Troubleshooting compilation issues?

2016-10-01 Thread David Becker
t; You could check this conversation: > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/ > oith5a0hSZ0/discussion > > > Regards. > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 12:20 AM, David Becker <david.bec...@sencha.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.bec...@sencha.com');>

Troubleshooting compilation issues?

2016-09-30 Thread David Becker
Any advice on how to trouble shoot code that runs fine in SDM but causes lockups when run in full compiled mode? Using the -draftCompile flag fixes it in compiled mode too. This suggests that something in the optimizations isn't playing nice with the code, but I'm at a bit of a loss for how to

Re: Using Element Queries (EQCSS) with GSS?

2016-08-21 Thread David Becker
Thanks for the suggestions, Jens. I'll do some experiments and see what happens. On Sunday, August 21, 2016, Jens wrote: > > Unfortunately, using a separate TextResource isn't quite what I'm looking >> for. I want the best of both worlds. :) >> > > Hm looking at the

Re: Using Element Queries (EQCSS) with GSS?

2016-08-21 Thread David Becker
Yeah, that's what I meant by GSS. EQCSS looks like a very powerful and useful concept - I hope it does become genuine CSS some day. Unfortunately, using a separate TextResource isn't quite what I'm looking for. I want the best of both worlds. :) On Sunday, August 21, 2016, Jens

Using Element Queries (EQCSS) with GSS?

2016-08-20 Thread David Becker
I am interesting in using element queries (see http://elementqueries.com/) within GSS resources. Of course, GSS doesn't recognize the @element rules and emits an error. Does anyone has any suggestions on how I might get this working? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are

[gwt-contrib] Re: Hide GWT Development Mode window

2016-08-20 Thread David Becker
Yes, just run in headless mode by adding "-Djava.awt.headless=true" to your VM arguments. I do this all the time on mac. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/javase/headless-136834.html On Friday, August 19, 2016 at 11:56:24 AM UTC-7, Paul Stockley wrote: > > When launching the SDM code

Any way to apply a prefix to CssResources globally?

2016-06-10 Thread David Becker
You can apply prefixes to a CssResource when @Import-ing with the @ImportedWithPrefix("foobar") annotation; or when using the "obfuscated" style you can set CssResource.obfuscationPrefix="foobar-". But, I would also like to apply the foobar- prefix (even when not importing) and when using the

Re: Issues with GWT 2.8 snapshot

2016-06-10 Thread David Becker
The code review link Roberto mentioned says it's still under review and hasn't been merged yet. -.. .- ...- .. -.....-... . -.-. -.- . .-. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Hristo Stoyanov wrote: > Thanks Roberto, > Just a to confirm that the issue is still with

Re: JsInterop and Java collections?

2016-06-09 Thread David Becker
I very much like the idea of being able to specify a mapper in the annotation. In fact, I'd like to see that in general for any type marshaling through JsInterop. That could be useful for a variety of situations, such as custom enum mappings. On Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 4:51:59 PM UTC-7,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Adding @JsFunction to java.util.function JRE Emulation?

2016-05-17 Thread David Becker
That would be — awesome. Pretty please? :) On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 11:13:09 AM UTC-7, Jens wrote: > > > The issue is that @JsFunction implementors must "extend >> java.lang.Object" as their parent. because standard library functions >> are/canbe implemented on classes with complicated

Re: [gwt-contrib] Adding @JsFunction to java.util.function JRE Emulation?

2016-05-11 Thread David Becker
to override > those > >>> other methods as well. > >>> > >>> You could nearly achieve this effect by just making a method reference > to > >>> the "apply" or "test" method, and passing that as an actual JsFunction &

[gwt-contrib] Adding @JsFunction to java.util.function JRE Emulation?

2016-05-11 Thread David Becker
I think it would be good to add @JsFunction to all of the java.util.function interfaces in the JRE Emulation so that we can use standard function signatures with JsInterop. Would that work? Any drawbacks? If you think that's a good idea, I can submit a patch. Thanks! -- You received this

[gwt-contrib] Re: Newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 ?

2016-05-03 Thread David Becker
there because it didn't do that when both the plugin and GWT were on 2.8.0-beta1, but perhaps it's really an issue with the GWT snapshot. Being a snapshot, that's always a possibility of course. :) Thanks for your help! On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 5:09:56 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote

[gwt-contrib] Newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 ?

2016-05-02 Thread David Becker
Is there a newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 that should be used with GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT? I want to try out the latest snapshots to keep abreast of the current status-quo, but I'm getting red highlights on JRE Emulation in IntelliJ that I don't get if I use GWT 2.8.0-beta1 with the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Elemental 2 and J2CL timeline

2016-04-28 Thread David Becker
As a GXT developer at Sencha, we are keenly aware of the community's concerns around the future of things like Widget, UiBinder, etc. and how GWT 3 might upend the apple-cart. GWT 3 is still very far away and its plans very nebulous. It's far too early to talk specifics, but I assure you

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Addresses are different when running SDM with bindAddress 0.0.0.0?

2016-03-23 Thread David Becker
I have incorporated the latest review feedback and reposted. Please review again. Thank you all for your patience as I learn the ropes... On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:51:05 PM UTC-7, David Becker wrote: > > Hi Jens, et. al, > > I was just wondering if you thought &

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Addresses are different when running SDM with bindAddress 0.0.0.0?

2016-03-22 Thread David Becker
Hi Jens, et. al, I was just wondering if you thought https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14300/ might get picked up in time for 2.8? It seems to have stalled out on the review front. Thanks! On Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 3:55:34 PM UTC-8, Brandon Donnelson wrote: > > Thanks Jens, >