Nice to see such a quick follow-up to a security finding and also fast progress
for Java 17/21 support!
Kind regards
David Nouls
On 9 Jan 2024 at 22:36 +0100, Colin Alworth , wrote:
> I'm excited to announce the release of 2.10.1 and 2.11.0! This is our second
> release under the
Hello I read that FireFox and Chrome are deprecating the useragent string.
Is GWT depending on this and will it be impacted ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
What is the exception stack trace ?
On 12 Oct 2021, 19:09 +0200, Guillen Antonio , wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am struggling with a pb using RPC:
>
> When I use the service to create and store my objects in my DB (Neo4J) using
> remote service, all is Fine.
> When I try to load my objects all is ok in
i set
> no more Class.forName but CartographyImpl
> 3. see above.
>
> So can you give me more informations...
>
> Thanks a lot for your help
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
> > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 12:03, David Nouls a écrit :
> > >
> > > I see
I see multiple problems with your code. The most important being that you are
ignoring the fact that an rpc call is asynchronous. So the load method will
ralways return null because the request has not been executed when the method
returns.
Another problem is the fact that the async is returni
Hi,
Migration is nearly invisible but if you depend on 3rd party gwt libs then
there is always risk that they are no longer supported.
I ran into some backward compatibility issue with generics support with GWT2.9.
It compiled on 2.8 but fails with 2.9. I did not find the time to create a bug
In my project we solved this issue by putting a reverse proxy in front of both
the CodeServer running on localhost and our application running on another
machine. We are not using facebook authentication but we have our own SAML
based auth system
I based that implementation on thomas his devse
I don’t think that is possible.
In my project I am using a reverse proxy that fronts both my website and the
codeserver and it replaces the nocache file. I also change the generated output
of the codeserver because otherwise the sourcemaps do not work with newer
versions of Chrome.
I would lov
Great work, thanks!
On 29 Mar 2021, 21:28 +0200, Juan Pablo Gardella ,
wrote:
> Awesome! Thanks!!
>
> > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 16:10, Vegegoku wrote:
> > > Dears
> > >
> > > DominoKit team are very happy to announce the first Dominokit toolset
> > > release candidate, it took us too long but it
I have the opposite experience with Mockito.
By using mockito I am improving my designs so that they become simple to use
and easy to test.
That in combination with an injection framework (using Guice/Jukito) makes it
really easy to compose software and to test in isolation.
You do have to gua
I just browse to the sdm website at http://localhost:9876 and click on de
button to clear the cache
On 24 Feb 2021, 22:20 +0100, Stik , wrote:
> Aha, how do you clear the cache? i've never been sure where SDM is hiding it
> Stik
>
> > On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 8:40:0
It is a known issue with incremental compilation. It is annoying but I tend to
just clear the sdm cache and reload.
On 24 Feb 2021, 20:50 +0100, Stik , wrote:
> Occasionally when running under SDM in Eclipse I will get a "ReferenceError:
> _g$ is not defined" from the browser. The usual "fix" i
Oh it seams I have a conflict with my dependency on gwt-common-lang3 ...
included in de.knightsoft-net
On Wednesday, February 3, 2021 at 4:45:22 PM UTC+1 David Nouls wrote:
> I'm trying out gwt-time in my project. But I get some GWT compiler issues.
>
> I am using the 1.4.15 re
I'm trying out gwt-time in my project. But I get some GWT compiler issues.
I am using the 1.4.15 release with GWT 2.8.2 (we can't migrate to 2.9 due
to some issues with unsupported generic constructs in that version).
I am using the tbroyer plugin, but I tried adding the module manually just
in
gt; > > > > > Bertram wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice to hear from everyone!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's to the next ten years :-)
>
Hi Alex,
Same story here. I have been working with GWT since it first came out. For our
current project we again opted for GWT because we share a lot of code between
client and server and productivity is high.
I’m not available at the moment (maybe end of next year)… but living in
Belgium/Leuv
Hi Lofi,
In my company we are the only group that is working with GWT to develop a
new customer facing application. We have a few products in maintenance mode
that are also using GWT. But most new developments are using Angular.
The biggest problems we are facing with using GWT/Java for the cli
sedSupplement.java#L907-L909
>
> Fortunately, we're not actually using that class, and the build actually
> only fails because of -failOnError. This means I can work around the issue
> by excluding the file with some gwt.xml trick (I want to keep the
> -failOnError).
> But y
, 2020 at 4:16:14 PM UTC+2, David Nouls wrote:
>
> I don't have access to eclipse in my work environment - not allowed.
>
> On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 3:02:00 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
>>
>> So the Eclipse JDT version GWT uses has a generics bug then. Have you
>> tri
t;> Can you give an example so we can check to see if JDT has handled this in
>> a later update that we can migrate to?
>>
>> On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 9:21:54 AM UTC-5, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 1:55:42
I don't have access to eclipse in my work environment - not allowed.
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 3:02:00 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
>
> So the Eclipse JDT version GWT uses has a generics bug then. Have you
> tried open the project/code in Eclipse to see if Eclipse complains as well?
> If Eclipse does
I switched from GWT 2.8.2 to GWT 2.9.0 and I get some GWTC compilation
errors when compiling with certain generic constructs.
It compiles fine with JDK11 and in IntelliJ, but GWTC no longer seems to
support this:
[INFO] --- gwt-maven-plugin:1.0.0:compile (default-compile) @
cloud.platform.ui.de
; cache" of all annotations - the two fixes are to either exclude the
> jsinterop annotations from the cache (abbreviated rant: a cache like this
> should be based on a whitelist, not a blacklist), or provide sources and a
> .gwt.xml file for the annotations.
>
> -Colin
>
Strange, just retried today and now the compile worked properly.
Thanks for the support!
On 19 May 2020, 16:41 +0200, Colin Alworth , wrote:
> Nothing should have changed here as far as I am aware - GWT itself continues
> to have emulation for Annotation, Enum, etc (Predicate doesnt seem to be
>
Compiling module
com.swift.cloud.platform.multitenant.event.SerializationTest.JUnit
Resolving com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JacksonAnnotation
Found type 'com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JacksonAnnotation'
[WARN] Unable to resolve interface java/lang/annotation/Annotation
R
I'm in the process of trying out GWT 2.9.0 with a big project.
I noticed that for some reason I suddenly get errors about sources
java.lang.annotation.Annotation (also about Predicate) not being available.
I guess there was a big cleanup of the inherits in all the packages ? Did I
miss that in
Congratulations on a big milestone and great news to hear for the plan to
release more frequently. Is that just an intent or is it automated ?
On Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 5:40:25 AM UTC+2, Colin Alworth wrote:
>
> Today we are pleased to announce the next release of GWT, version 2.9.0.
> Some h
ase has the same problem?
>
> > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 14:12, David Nouls wrote:
> > > I am using GWT for many years now. My project uses 2.8.2 and we are using
> > > SDM for debugging.
> > > For some reason suddenly I can no longer debug my application in
I am using GWT for many years now. My project uses 2.8.2 and we are using
SDM for debugging.
For some reason suddenly I can no longer debug my application in any of my
browsers on my machine.
I was working up to 2 weeks ago and now it no longer works.
I have searched the internet for any hin
Has it only been 3 years ? I also don’t understand why dwt devs are so out of
touch with their user base. Nobody will take gwt 3 as a serious option. All old
GWT apps will have been migrated to other toolkits by the time it gets released.
Why are these incremental changes not officially released
I'm having a problem with Date objects in GWT 2.8.2.
As part of a GUI component to create query objects for searching through
our database I have this piece of code that tries to compare from/to
objects (Object types are normally Date/BigDecimal/Integer/...)
I have this piece of code:
if (
> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 09:27:47 UTC, David Nouls wrote:
> >
> > Watch out with about:blank, if your app is running on SSL you will get
> > mixed content warnings on some browsers... not sure if that is still the
> > case, but that is one of the reasons why gwt wa
Watch out with about:blank, if your app is running on SSL you will get mixed
content warnings on some browsers... not sure if that is still the case, but
that is one of the reasons why gwt was using javascript:””
On 24 Jan 2019, 10:01 +0100, Rob , wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, 24 January 2019 06:56
try ‘default’ instead
On 30 Nov 2018, 15:17 +0100, Dylan DSouza , wrote:
> I'm porting my Java LIBGDX game to Javascript. There's some JSNI code that
> looks something like this:
>
> private native void hello()
> /*-{
> var object1 = {default: 'foo', b: 42};
> console.log(object1.default);
I noticed you mentioned that elemental2 allows us to use the browser storage
API’s. By coincidence I was looking for those but failed to find them (in the
Window class). Am I looking in the wrong location again ?
For now I just created my own JsInterop classes to acces it.
On 19 Nov 2018, 23:14
Hi Marko,
I guess you have not been following GWT discussions a lot. GWT 3 is going to
build on top of this j2cl and from what I followed here, on gwt-user and on
gitter, there are already a lot of packages of GWT converted to work with j2cl.
There will be problems supporting everything in GWT
By just adding sources to jaxb it will not work.
You need to have these sources in a gwt source folder. so it javax.xml.bind
package must be declared as a source folder in a gwt.xml files before the
GWT compiler picks it up to cross compile.
I don't think that adding the package in you module.gw
I converted from Eclipse to IntelliJ CE a few months ago. I agree that it works
much better when combined with maven builds as compared to eclipse.
one thing though is that you dont get much assistance with uiBinder templates.
So it might be more difficult to pick up as a beginner (unless you in
It makes sense somehow, but it took me by surprise. Thanks for the explanation.
Is it still good practice to remove listeners when you don’t need the html
element anymore ? or do modern browser garbage collectors cope with circular
references between DOM and JS objects ? It was one of the featur
I think I found a little bug in the java 8 support in GWT. Or at least, it does
not work as I expected it would.
I am using Elemental2 and I am trying to remove an EventListener from a
HTMLElement.
The listener was previously installed like this:
element.addEventListener(“click”, this::handleCl
clear your temp folder, sdm puts lots of stuff there and sometimes it gets
corrupted and you get these kind of errrors.
On 24 Jul 2018, 18:53 +0200, Velusamy Velu , wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> I appreciate your recommendation. Yes it's in SDM mode. I don't have the
> luxury to try your suggestion rig
Did you try to put the chart inside a SimpleLayoutPanel ?
On 6 May 2018, 16:48 +0200, yaniv54321 , wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i have a GWT app based on RootPanel and not RootLayoutPanel
>
> but it seems that the only way i can use charts (gwt-charts-0.9.10.jar) is by
> using RootLayoutPanel
>
> i have
Watch out with gxt licensing when you allow users to modify screen leyouts.
Sencha sees this as a developer and your user needs to pay for a license. I
had to remove GXT from a project for such a case.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Łukasz Bączek
wrote:
> Hello,
> He needs to find or write
Thanks, it works now. Nice work! Quite an extensive widget set you have
created. It will take me some time to investigate. Is it created by 2 people ?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Théophane Charbonnier
wrote:
> Oups !
> My bad, I did not set the DOCTYPE on the html.
> That's now done. This
It is a bit ironic but developping gwt apps is easiest on ie11 :)
But you can't stop progress.
By focussing more on unit testing I no longer depend on DevMode. The only thing
where I use it is when I am working on CSS or widget changes. But there
SuperDevMode is just as helpful if the incr
45 matches
Mail list logo
