Ari,
If you're building an App Engine app, GWT provides you with an App Engine
development server which mimics the App Engine production environment. The
production environment does not allow you to read from arbitrary paths (the
security exception you see) or make arbitrary networking
There's a known issue, in at least Sun's JDK and OpenJDK, where ClassLoader
lookups are O(N) of the entries on the classpath. GWT can perform a very
large number of lookups, so it's especially affected. One way to workaround
this is to collapse multiple classpath entries into a single jar or
This is a little too surprising. ThreadLocal accesses are very fast (think
1us).
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 9:25 PM, skybr...@google.com wrote:
Surprisingly, using a ThreadLocal is the slowest so far. Going back to
using shards.
GWT RPC has been particularly offensive when it comes to being slow in
Chrome. If you're using RPC, try running GWT from SVN head. You should see a
massive improvement in Chrome performance.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Dennis Haupt d.haup...@googlemail.comwrote:
switching to dev mode took
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski
grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Poking around a bit more I found that gwtc seems to assume internally
that whenever type name contains '$' it's in binary form and if it
doesn't contain dollar sign then it can be considered to
Do you have the contact information for the Apple Engineer?
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Shawn Brown big.coffee.lo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I used the open-jdk workaround to solve the problems introduced by the
latest apple java sdk update but have a question an Apple engineer
asked me
I'm concerned about how this might impact logging results. For example, even
if the results are written out on a separate thread (and assuming the box
has an entirely free processor to deal with it), you can still cause the
disk to be busy with I/O during the writes, slowing down the real time of
on in
between them. That'd be trivial to both implement and understand. I can see
how if you had a lot of top-level events calling flush for each one probably
wouldn't be desirable.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Toby Reyelts
It sounds to me as if we should be integrating with the facilities in
Servlet 3.0, since it has been final now for over a year. Specifically see:
Section 4.4: Configuration methods - An API to add and configure servlets,
filters, and listeners at runtime.
Chapter 8: Annotations and Pluggability -
No, I didn't investigate. Pretty sure this predates our use of jarjar
though, so it may have had something to do with that.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:38 PM, sco...@google.com wrote:
LGTM.
Did we ever figure out why we're bundling this in as source instead of
using the jars in tools?
Done.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:15 PM, sco...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/691801/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/BuildTypeMap.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/691801/diff/1/2#newcode497
- Does the rest of your GWT UI show up fine?
- When you run with Eclipse are you ever testing the compiled production
(web) version of your app, or are you always running in development mode?
- Are you testing with the same browser against App Engine as you are
against Eclipse?
- You can try
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:12 PM, to...@google.com wrote:
Do you need to make any changes to GenerateJavaScriptAst to
prevent/change
code-gen for external types?
Yes, we would not want to code-gen external types, and
SGTM
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:28 PM, sco...@google.com wrote:
That seems like a grand idea. How about if I just scrap this whole
patch then, and make the 1-line change to use 1.5f?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/312804/show
--
Hi Daniel,
We're not aware of any changes for this functionality. Can you give us your
app-id so we can investigate further? (Feel free to use a private reply).
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:30 AM, dflorey wrote:
Ok, I double checked with my app on several customers domains. All
apps running on
[bcc google-appengine-j...@googlegroups.com]
[+google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com]
Hey Robin,
You'll probably get a quicker answer for this on the GWT users group.
2009/8/24 Zhi Le Zou zouzh...@gmail.com
Hi,
As you know, the default theme is blue, i.e. the borders or tabs are all in
blue.
Hey David,
I think this is a question you might want to ask on the GWT group.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:10 PM, DTrejo tookie.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am having a problem with my CSS.
My hosted mode is a bit laggy, so when I first run the my gwt app in
hosted mode, the css
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Ray Cromwell cromwell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
I think this is a false dichotomy. JDO has fetch-groups for just that
kind
of scenario. You send down a slice of an object graph that meets
Overall, the change to treat server classes vs system classes separately,
such that system classes are API classes and server classes are
implementation classes looks good.
I'm concerned that there will still be places where things will clash - such
as the sharing of log4j across both server and
I'm not sure I have all the context here, but as a guiding principle, Jetty
should be able to parse the XML files of web applications (web.xml, tag
libraries, etc...) regardless of whatever XML libraries are or are not
bundled with the webapp. This means:
1) Jetty should never use XML libraries
I don't know the big picture being discussed here, but I'm pretty sure he's
referring to http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/projectconventions.html
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:47 AM, logicpeters logicpet...@gmail.com wrote:
Why
to...
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Toby Reyelts to...@google.com wrote:
I don't know the big picture being discussed here, but I'm pretty sure
he's referring to
http://java.sun.com/blueprints/code/projectconventions.html
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote
Overall LGTM,
1) You might want to put a small comment that you can't do,
settings.put(CompilerOptions.OPTION_Source, CompilerOptions.VERSION_1_6);
settings.put(CompilerOptions.OPTION_TargetPlatform,
CompilerOptions.VERSION_1_5);
2) I don't think you want to unconditionally set the version to
23 matches
Mail list logo
