http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7414
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 16:48:47 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 4:14:44 PM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Well, I have the requestFactory-apt set as annotation processor. But
maybe problem is that the type
, June 8, 2012 12:59:57 AM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Is there a way to find out WHICH TYPE other then scanning my large
codebase?
Isn't ValidationTool giving you warnings?
You can also simply put a breakpoing into ReflectiveServiceLayer where
this error is reported and look at the value
Yeap, the interface is a bit couterintuitive thanks to Czech translation
that I am seeing. Publicise your answer should be Reply publicly.
Anyway.
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 9:52:56 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 12:19:57 AM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
This Google Groups
. above) now have to be
static Java fileds on the trapoline. (Trampoline is not very
flexible/dynamic thing indeed)
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 9:57:09 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 12:54:48 AM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Regarding callbacks there is one more error I am
The requested type is not
default-instantiable does not include concrete type info?
It would speed up development.
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 10:00:41 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 12:59:57 AM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Is there a way to find out WHICH TYPE other then scanning my large
That breakpoint really helped. (It is trying to instantiate an interface -
due to some refactoring)
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 10:00:41 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 12:59:57 AM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Is there a way to find out WHICH TYPE other then scanning my large
2012 14:29:46 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 2:14:27 PM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Why the aforementioned error message The requested type is not
default-instantiable does not include concrete type info?
It would speed up development.
I agree (kind of), though in theory
(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 2:04:37 PM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
gwt-2.4.0/doc/helpInfo/jsoRestrictions.html comes with GWT
distribution. So far best readable document on the topic. However, a bit of
disappointment. b/c It implies I can not implement callbacks in a neat way
and in general
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 16:48:47 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer napsal(a):
On Friday, June 8, 2012 4:14:44 PM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
Well, I have the requestFactory-apt set as annotation processor. But
maybe problem is that the type that I wanted to create on server is an
interface
Dne úterý, 5. června 2012 3:42:36 UTC+2 zorro napsal(a):
I am trying to implement a callback using JSNI.
1. I don't know if changing this is allowed in the way I do it.
2. I don't know if such an assignment is advisable from the perspective
of JSNI functionality
3. The compiler
This Google Groups interface is F* HORRIBLE. I send a response and it
disappears as I never send it. So now what is it out there or not? Wasn't
this written in GWT?
Dne pátek, 8. června 2012 0:17:03 UTC+2 zorro napsal(a):
Dne úterý, 5. června 2012 3:42:36 UTC+2 zorro napsal(a):
I am
3:42:36 AM UTC+2, zorro wrote:
I am trying to implement a callback using JSNI.
1. I don't know if changing this is allowed in the way I do it.
No.
BTW, you're not doing much.
2. I don't know if such an assignment is advisable from the perspective
of JSNI functionality
No.
3
, 8. června 2012 0:17:03 UTC+2 zorro napsal(a):
Dne úterý, 5. června 2012 3:42:36 UTC+2 zorro napsal(a):
I am trying to implement a callback using JSNI.
1. I don't know if changing this is allowed in the way I do it.
2. I don't know if such an assignment is advisable from the perspective
Is there a way to find out WHICH TYPE other then scanning my large codebase?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/UHu_fyXgIgMJ.
To
Dne neděle, 27. května 2012 13:12:41 UTC+2 zorro napsal(a):
I just read the
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/FAQ_Server after
unsuccessful attempt to run local appengine server separately from my GWT
junit integration tests of GWT RPC. I am getting SOP error SEVERE
I am trying to implement a callback using JSNI.
1. I don't know if changing this is allowed in the way I do it.
2. I don't know if such an assignment is advisable from the perspective of
JSNI functionality
3. The compiler in Eclispe does not seem to grasp that as well and I don't
know the
I just read the
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/FAQ_Server after
unsuccessful attempt to run local appengine server separately from my GWT
junit integration tests of GWT RPC. I am getting SOP error SEVERE:
runtimeError: message=[Access to restricted URI denied]
Found in GWT Release (e.g. 2.4.0, 2.5.0 RC):
2.4.0
Encountered on OS / Browser (e.g. WinXP, IE8-9, FF7):
Windnows Vista, Chrome 19 latest stable
Detailed description (please be as specific as possible):
Storage.getLocalStorageIfSupported() returns null when called from a
GWTTestcase in both
18 matches
Mail list logo
