Thanks to all for your replies!!
On 12 Gen, 00:01, George Georgovassilis
wrote:
> Wow, thanks a lot :-)
>
> On 11.01.2011 19:45, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:51:59 PM UTC+1, George Georgovassilis
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi Richard,
>
> > Sorry to hijack this thre
Wow, thanks a lot :-)
On 11.01.2011 19:45, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:51:59 PM UTC+1, George Georgovassilis
wrote:
Hi Richard,
Sorry to hijack this thread (I promise I'll be quiet after that:-).
Since I've not yet had the chance to write any code with t
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 5:51:59 PM UTC+1, George Georgovassilis wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Sorry to hijack this thread (I promise I'll be quiet after that:-).
> Since I've not yet had the chance to write any code with the
> RequestFactory, I am still curious about the http payload size. F
Hi Richard,
Sorry to hijack this thread (I promise I'll be quiet after that:-).
Since I've not yet had the chance to write any code with the
RequestFactory, I am still curious about the http payload size. For
example, what I didn't like with RPC was that it included the full
qualified class names
FWIW, I made the switch from Gilead to RequestFactory and was pleased
with the outcome. I am sure that both will work fine, but I seem to
recall fewer setup/configuration issues with RequestFactory. Gilead
is wonderful, but perhaps because RequestFactory is "built-in" it is a
little easier to get
Hi,
actually I'm using gwt 2.1.1 with hibernate and gilead. Gilead is very
comfortable because I don't have to create DTO class for my domain.
I would like an opinion on the new system "RequestFactory" compared
with Gilead. What do you recommend?
Thanks very much
Best regards
Daniele
--
You r
