There are many GWT applications handling more then million users like
Gmail, Google Wave, Orkut etc... so can't believe that some one has
raise such concern.
On Jun 21, 1:25 pm, Jaroslav Záruba wrote:
> What was such claim based on? It does sound weird to me.
> Client-side, which is where GWT o
You know that cows (and deer too) chew their cud. Cows have a
secondary stomach, so it could store whatever grass it has chewed off
the field in the 2ndary stomach. Then it could regurgitate the stored
cud and chew on it afterwards.
Your question is akin to saying that you read an article that say
Hi manish,
the opposite is true.
An AJAX/GWT-approach reduces dramatically the load from the servers.
I showed in an estimation that with GWT/AJAX a server is able to drive
10-50 times more clients, compared to classical web technology like
JSP, JSF
So using GWT is also a green IT topic.
The ger
Yes, but think that user will ask for more interactivity... resulting
in more requests. But, of course, bandwidth, CPU and memory will be
saved. They will be saved more is a good architecture is used like a
Rest-like server, I think.
Olivier
On Jun 22, 10:33 am, Chris Boertien wrote:
> Your esse
Your essentially asking the wrong question. I think its better to
think of by how much will GWT or products similar to GWT reduce the
load on a server.
You have to consider the fact that every user accessing a traditional
website backed by a templating engine involves alot of resources for
each an
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:28 PM, rakesh wagh wrote:
> If you compare gwt to other js based toolkits, they all behave similar
> as far as client to server communication is concerned. gwt only makes
> life simple for the developers.
>
...and (with comparably complex UI) makes your JavaScript run f
You can either drive a nail using hammer or break some one's head! It
really depends on how you use the tool; be it the hammer or gwt.
as far as million access is concerned, it completely depends on your
server if it can handle that load or not. Look into your server side
code, server infrastructu
References, please?
The most charitable interpretation of this is that someone is
misinformed.
On Jun 19, 7:44 pm, manish kumar wrote:
> Hi, i have gone through many articles on web and found that GWT is not
> good for an application that has million users access simultaniouly.
> Is that really
The claims must be from .net side. Please post the articles. I do want
to read them.
On Jun 21, 2:25 pm, Jaroslav Záruba wrote:
> What was such claim based on? It does sound weird to me.
> Client-side, which is where GWT operates mostly, does not care about how
> many users is accessing your webs
What was such claim based on? It does sound weird to me.
Client-side, which is where GWT operates mostly, does not care about how
many users is accessing your website. By providing things like ClientBundle
or code-splitting I think GWT helps your website handle loads of users
better.
On Sun, Jun 2
i dont think this has anything to do with GWT. ITs upto you what mess you
make of your code, that it cant support a million users.
U say u have seen "many articles" can u please post some of them here?
In fact, GWT goes to extreme lengths to ensure that the application is
optimized and behaves in
Hi, i have gone through many articles on web and found that GWT is not
good for an application that has million users access simultaniouly.
Is that really true? If not then what should i do make it accessible
by million users?Is that really tough job in GWT?
--
You received this message because y
12 matches
Mail list logo
