Re: jsitenterop: elemental status

2017-03-20 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
I __think__ I saw a video or presentation stating that we shouldn't wrap js libraries through jsinterop directly but instead wait for the typescript --> jsinterop transpiler. I am not 100% sure I recall correctly though. Before that video I wasn't aware of such an effort but now that I am I also

Re: jsitenterop: elemental status

2017-03-18 Thread Dave Puchyr
That is great news! Thanks for the quick reply. On Saturday, March 18, 2017 at 11:06:49 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 18, 2017 at 9:15:55 AM UTC+1, Dave Puchyr wrote: >> >> I think that you make excellent points and have a very relevant question. >> I'm a big fan of

Re: jsitenterop: elemental status

2017-03-18 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Saturday, March 18, 2017 at 9:15:55 AM UTC+1, Dave Puchyr wrote: > > I think that you make excellent points and have a very relevant question. > I'm a big fan of GWT, but I have to ask the GWT powers that be: Is > elemental2 like the vaporware that singularity turned out to be? > I don't

Re: jsitenterop: elemental status

2017-03-18 Thread Dave Puchyr
I think that you make excellent points and have a very relevant question. I'm a big fan of GWT, but I have to ask the GWT powers that be: Is elemental2 like the vaporware that singularity turned out to be? Dave On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 3:14:27 PM UTC+1, Vassilis Virvilis wrote: > > Hi, > >

jsitenterop: elemental status

2017-03-06 Thread Vassilis Virvilis
Hi, As someone who has spent some time writing bindings for jquery, d3, datatables etc I believe that is not possible to create meaningful bindings automatically. Furthermore I don't believe that javascript browser bindings change so fast that need to be automated. I may be wrong of course.