[gwt-contrib] Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

2009-02-06 Thread nicolas de loof
Your example works, The issue is that I don't load the class from a classloader, I'm using BCEL to read the .class and access the GWT_VERSION_NUM field, so static initializer is not executed. I now fallback to reading the About.properties if present, this fix my version-detection issue Cheers, Ni

[gwt-contrib] Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

2009-02-06 Thread Scott Blum
LOL, well that would explain it. :) To be fair, in previous versions this would have worked since those fields were (I think wrongly) compile-time-constants. On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:10 AM, nicolas de loof wrote: > Your example works, > The issue is that I don't load the class from a classloader

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4639 - in branches/snapshot-2009.01.29/user: src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui test/com/google/g...

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Thu Feb 5 11:18:14 2009 New Revision: 4639 Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.01.29/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PopupPanel.java branches/snapshot-2009.01.29/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/DialogBoxTest.java Log: Fixes squirrely case wh

[gwt-contrib] default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong

2009-02-06 Thread Arthur Kalmenson
Hello everyone, I'm not sure who rsyncs GWT releases to Maven central, but if you look at: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-user you can see that the default GWT version is 1.5-RC1 and not 1.5.3. -- Arthur Kalmenson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http:

[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong

2009-02-06 Thread nicolas de loof
What make you say ths is the default one ? Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/ ../ 1.4.60/17-Sep-2007 17:57 - 1.4.62/23-Mar-2008 09:10 - 1.5-M1/

[gwt-contrib] Work around for gwt issue 3340

2009-02-06 Thread ecc
Reviewers: jgw, Description: issue url: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3340 This work around stops a race condition from happening in IE that causes the image not to be cached correctly if the onLoad event is hooked up to the image immediately after the image is add

[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong

2009-02-06 Thread nicolas de loof
AFAIK, mvnrepository "latest" is based on textual version comparison, so 1.5-RC* > 1.5.3 On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > What make you say ths is the default one ? > Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/ > > ../ > 1.4.60/17-

[gwt-contrib] Re: Tighten up query string parsing for "locale" value in I18N.gwt.xml

2009-02-06 Thread Scott Blum
You could also check that the preceding character is '?' or '&'. I'm not sure in this context if it can actually be at pos 0 or not. On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:55 PM, wrote: > > Reviewers: jat, > > Description: > Tighten up query string parsing for "locale" value in I18N.gwt.xml. > Potentially, a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

2009-02-06 Thread Matthew Mastracci
Scott et. al, Great release! I spent a few hours migrating our codebase and build process without much trouble. 1. The new expanded WAR format makes life a lot easier for us to run with -noserver. With 1.5, we had to regenerate the hosted.html and nocache.js files every time something ch

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4650 - in changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev dev/core/src/...

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 07:43:25 2009 New Revision: 4650 Added: changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/util/arg/ArgHandlerDisableClassMetadata.java (contents, props changed) changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602/dev/core/src/com

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4648 - changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/js

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: b...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 06:39:06 2009 New Revision: 4648 Modified: changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/js/JsInliner.java Log: Fix runAsync interaction by not expanding top-level function invocations. Modified: changes/bobv/elide_rpc_

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4651 - changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 08:56:43 2009 New Revision: 4651 Modified: changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryCompilationUnitBuilder.java changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/CompilationState.java Log: Add TODO about linking source t

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4649 - tags/1.6.0

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: sco...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 07:31:15 2009 New Revision: 4649 Added: tags/1.6.0/ - copied from r4621, /releases/1.6/ Log: Tagging 1.6 Milestone 1. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~-

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR : Declassifying RPC / Removing all type names from compilation

2009-02-06 Thread BobV
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:28 AM, BobV wrote: > http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r4602 > Future changes: > - A compiler flag or optional module to neuter Class.getName(). I've added an -XdisableClassMetadata flag to this branch. This disables: - Cl

[gwt-contrib] Google API Libraries for GWT: New binaries ready for download

2009-02-06 Thread Eric Ayers
Another round of updates is ready for the Google API Libraries for Google Web Toolkit (GWT). As just announced on the GWT blog, this update brings bug fixes and new features to three of the existing libraries. - The Google Visualization API Library for GWT moves from a release candidate to a pu

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4653 - in trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev: . shell/tomcat

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 11:07:31 2009 New Revision: 4653 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/GWTShell.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/tomcat/EmbeddedTomcatServer.java Log: Merge of c4609 from branches/snapshot-2009.01.29. Modified: trunk/

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4654 - in releases/1.6/user: src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui test/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 11:11:50 2009 New Revision: 4654 Modified: releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PopupPanel.java releases/1.6/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/DialogBoxTest.java Log: Merge of c4628, c4639 from branches/snapshot-2009.01.29.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4655 - in releases/1.6/user: src/com/google/gwt/dom/client src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui tes...

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 11:16:54 2009 New Revision: 4655 Added: releases/1.6/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ButtonTest.java - copied unchanged from r4624, /branches/snapshot-2009.01.29/user/test/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/ButtonTest.java Modified: rel

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4656 - releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: e...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 11:20:51 2009 New Revision: 4656 Modified: releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/Image.java Log: Fixes issue 3340 by preventing IE race condition from occurring when the on load handler is set. Review by:jlabanca Modified: releases/1.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4657 - releases/1.6

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: fabb...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 11:33:34 2009 New Revision: 4657 Modified: releases/1.6/branch-info.txt Log: Typo correction: I backmerged c4*6*03, at 4*6*05, not 450[35] Modified: releases/1.6/branch-info.txt ===

[gwt-contrib] code review requested - merge OOPHM hosted.html

2009-02-06 Thread John Tamplin
The attached patch, relative to trunk r4600, merges the functionality of OOPHM's hosted.html into the main one so you don't have to switch the deployed hosted.html in -noserver mode depending on whether you are running legacy hosted mode or OOPHM. in addition to applying this patch, do: svn rm dev

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4658 - in releases/1.6: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell user

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: amitman...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 11:47:58 2009 New Revision: 4658 Modified: releases/1.6/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/CompilingClassLoader.java releases/1.6/user/build.xml Log: Update to the test target for emma hosted mode. Plus, added check to not generate cl

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r4657 - releases/1.6

2009-02-06 Thread Scott Blum
BTW: your merge computation was off... On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > -/tr...@c4503 was merged (r4505) into /releases/1.6 > +/tr...@c4603 was merged (r4605) into /releases/1.6 > We probably want to say (c4605) to be clear. > The next merge into trunk will be: > -svn merge -r4511:45

[gwt-contrib] Re: Announcing GWT 1.6 Milestone 1

2009-02-06 Thread Scott Blum
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Matthew Mastracci wrote: > 2. The compiler task crashes Java 1.6 on Mac now. The previous versions > would run fine with the 64-bit JVM (even though SWT isn't compatible). > Would it be possible to lazy load SWT so that we can take advantage of the > faster 1.6

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR : Declassifying RPC / Removing all type names from compilation

2009-02-06 Thread Scott Blum
FYI: this will break some JRE code that depends on inspecting Class names of array types to do optimized things. On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:21 PM, BobV wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:28 AM, BobV wrote: > > > http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/changes/bobv/elide_rpc_type_names_r460

[gwt-contrib] Re: [google-web-toolkit commit] r4657 - releases/1.6

2009-02-06 Thread Scott Blum
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Freeland Abbott wrote: > Sigh. Right; everybody else does start to just-before-end, but svn merge > does just-after-start to end. :-/ Remember, once you have applied c100, you will be at r100. :) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://grou

[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong

2009-02-06 Thread Arthur Kalmenson
Yep, that's what I meant, so if you don't include a version and let Maven pick up the latest version, it'll pick up 1.5-RC1. You can also see from the size graph that 1.5-RC1 is considered newer then 1.5.3. This might be a problem for some people. P.S. Will 1.6-M1 hit central or will it be just t

[gwt-contrib] Re: RR : Declassifying RPC / Removing all type names from compilation

2009-02-06 Thread BobV
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Scott Blum wrote: > FYI: this will break some JRE code that depends on inspecting Class names of > array types to do optimized things. Ah, it appears my EmulSuite tests weren't actually running in -web mode. It looks like these issues can be fixed by implementing

[gwt-contrib] Re: code review requested - merge OOPHM hosted.html

2009-02-06 Thread John Tamplin
Updated patch -- I had tested only on my local machine, so I didn't notice it wasn't picking up gwt.hosted from the URL properly. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributor

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4661 - trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 13:24:55 2009 New Revision: 4661 Modified: trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev/GWTShell.java Log: Fix build breakage introduced by 1.6 merge. Patch by: jgw Review by: jat (Desk check) Modified: trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev/GWTSh

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4664 - in trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev: . shell

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 14:54:00 2009 New Revision: 4664 Modified: trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev/GWTShell.java trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/PlatformSpecific.java trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/ShellMainWindow.java Lo

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4662 - in trunk: dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell user

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 13:29:31 2009 New Revision: 4662 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/CompilingClassLoader.java trunk/user/build.xml Log: Merging releases/1.6 into trunk. svn merge -r4657:4658 https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/relea

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4660 - releases/1.6

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 13:07:25 2009 New Revision: 4660 Modified: releases/1.6/branch-info.txt Log: Merging releases/1.6 into trunk. Modified: releases/1.6/branch-info.txt == --- releases/1.6/bran

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4663 - releases/1.6

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 13:29:55 2009 New Revision: 4663 Modified: releases/1.6/branch-info.txt Log: Merging releases/1.6 into trunk. Modified: releases/1.6/branch-info.txt == --- releases/1.6/bran

[gwt-contrib] Re: merge OOPHM hosted.html

2009-02-06 Thread jat
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/2804/diff/1/2 File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/hosted.html (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/2804/diff/1/2#newcode35 Line 35: window.onunload = function() { On 2009/02/06 23:58:41, rjrjr wrote: > Here and below, why do you think

[gwt-contrib] Re: merge OOPHM hosted.html

2009-02-06 Thread rjrjr
LGTM! http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/2804 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4665 - in trunk/dev: core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/c...

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 16:43:08 2009 New Revision: 4665 Removed: trunk/dev/oophm/overlay/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/hosted.html Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/hosted.html Log: Merge OOPHM hosted.html into standard one. Patch b

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4666 - changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 16:44:33 2009 New Revision: 4666 Modified: changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryCompilationUnitBuilder.java changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryCompiledClass.java changes/jat/ihm/dev/core/src

[gwt-contrib] Re: code review requested - merge OOPHM hosted.html

2009-02-06 Thread Cameron Braid
Please also include my one liner patch here http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3291&q=reporter:cbraid Cam On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:20 AM, John Tamplin wrote: > Updated patch -- I had tested only on my local machine, so I didn't notice > it wasn't picking up gwt.hosted

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit commit] r4667 - in trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev: . js resource/impl

2009-02-06 Thread codesite-noreply
Author: j...@google.com Date: Fri Feb 6 21:06:26 2009 New Revision: 4667 Modified: trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/ArgHandlerOutDirDeprecated.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Link.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/Precompile.java trunk/dev/core/src/com/go

[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong

2009-02-06 Thread nicolas de loof
Allready there : http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.6.0/ On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote: > > Yep, that's what I meant, so if you don't include a version and let > Maven pick up the latest version, it'll pick up 1.5-RC1. You can also > see from the si

[gwt-contrib] Re: default GWT version in Maven central repo wrong

2009-02-06 Thread Ray Cromwell
Should probably use -Dversion=1.6-M1 for that rather than -Dversion=1.6.0 -Ray On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > Allready there : > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.6.0/ > > > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Arthur Kalmenson > wrote: >> >> Yep, t