Using the logging module with a gwt build from trunk (since the last
week) I get the following error during the gwt compile:
...
[java] Loading inherited module
'com.google.gwt.gen2.logging.Logging'
[java] Loading inherited module
'com.google.gwt.gen2.logging.CoreLogging'
Hi gwtc,
I was playing with using super-source to emulate some existing code
that uses a builder pattern and make it efficient in GWT as a
JavaScriptObject. I was hoping that the I could make the Builder just
compile away, but that doesn't seem to be happening. I started
debugging in JsInliner
Dear contributors,
We would like to interest you in a new extracting feature to GWT.
We add a sample application which using this feature and a short
documentation
(E1.rar and Extracting library and ITM.txt) .
We would be happy to hear your comments.
Thanks,
Elad and Osnat.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Freeland Abbottfabb...@google.com wrote:
Ping. Bob, I think you had special interest in this one. ;-)
ant clear dist-dev cd user ant test
does the right thing.
LGTM.
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
Reviewers: scottb,
Description:
Issue 3710 is caused by the Java inliner failing to take into account an
implicit cast to long in Integer::longValue(). The inliner already adds
explicit casts to the parameters of inlined methods. This patch has it
do so for return values as well.
If we run
wave id on the sandbox: eighty
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Matt Mastraccimatt...@mastracci.com wrote:
I do as well - I'm mmastrac.
On 15-Jun-09, at 8:02 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
I do, cromwellian is my id on the sandbox.
-Ray
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Bruce
I was talking to Scott about the same optimization, recognizing chains of
methods returning this and inlining them as a block. I haven't looked into
what's involved, though, and promise not to until Thursday at least
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Brian Stoler bsto...@google.com wrote:
Author: fabb...@google.com
Date: Tue Jun 16 08:28:58 2009
New Revision: 5563
Modified:
trunk/build-tools/ant-gwt/src/com/google/gwt/ant/taskdefs/LatestTimeJar.java
trunk/build.xml
trunk/samples/common.ant.xml
trunk/tools/api-checker/build.xml
trunk/tools/soyc-vis/build.xml
As I said, I hadn't looked at all into how feasible this was... but I was
hoping to do it by jiggering the Java AST, really, and not the JS one. That
is, I was looking to rewrite the Java from a chained
builder.setA().setB().setC() to multi-statement
builder.setA();builder.setB();builder.setC(),
Author: fabb...@google.com
Date: Tue Jun 16 08:37:30 2009
New Revision: 5564
Modified:
trunk/doc/build.xml
Log:
Missed file from r5563
Review by: bobv
Modified: trunk/doc/build.xml
==
--- trunk/doc/build.xml
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/40804/diff/1/5
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/resources/rebind/context/AbstractResourceContext.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/40804/diff/1/5#newcode43
Line 43: private static final MapTypeOracle, MapString, Object
CACHES = new
I am definitely for this kind of optimization, since GQuery is
effectively nothing but chained calls. However, I think the issue is
more complicated than just rewriting.
First, whether or not the optimization is an improvement depends on
subsequently whether or not the methods can be inlined.
I've been pondering an SSA structure for the compiler that would make
some of this stuff a lot easier to deal with. Instead of keeping the
AST for the Java and JS trees around, we'd put everything into a
unified data flow graph in memory (with appropriate side-effect
barriers), optimize
I prototyped a piece of this a couple of months ago in an attempt to
work out how to build an immediate dominator tree so as to perfectly
prune clinits. The problem is, you'd have to practically rewrite the
entire compiler. I think at this point, it's a little too much, maybe
something for GWT
Thanks for the review. Committed at r5566.
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Comment by poornimachandran123:
@Strict annotation will prove to boon and an error free system.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/CssResource
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Author: fabb...@google.com
Date: Tue Jun 16 10:17:46 2009
New Revision: 5565
Modified:
wiki/DefaultLocaleBinding.wiki
Log:
Edited wiki page through web user interface.
Modified: wiki/DefaultLocaleBinding.wiki
==
A very interesting idea, a sort of hybrid AST/SSA (hmm, I recall GCC
now has some kind of 'Tree SSA' too) although I think the real win
wouldn't come until you could replace conditionals like
JWhile/JIf/JFor with their SSA equivalents.The reason being, you'd be
limited from doing intra-block flow
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Tue Jun 16 12:25:57 2009
New Revision: 5567
Modified:
trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/resources/rg/CssTestCase.java
Log:
Fix missing file in r5566.
Modified: trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/resources/rg/CssTestCase.java
LGTM with nits.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/34836/diff/1001/2002
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/shell/rewrite/HasAnnotation.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/34836/diff/1001/2002#newcode29
Line 29: * a type.
Should mention the annotation has to be directly on the
Author: fabb...@google.com
Date: Tue Jun 16 14:20:27 2009
New Revision: 5568
Added:
trunk/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/
trunk/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/StandardSelectionPropertyTest.java
Modified:
Cameron, were you at Google I/O or did you sign up for the sandbox? I can
ask a Googler to invite you if not.
-Ray
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Cameron Braid came...@braid.com.au wrote:
2009/6/16 Bruce Johnson br...@google.com
I'm starting to make a bit o' progress on this. I'll send
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/39805
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
That would be marvelous. I hadn't thought through the implications of IHM,
but it seems like it might solve the problem.
What about types that aren't IHM compatible, such as those containing JSNI?
Could those still cause spurious errors?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Scott Blum
Comment by googelybear:
When I try to start it (Main class=com.google.gwt.dev.HostedMode) I get:
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
com.google.gwt.core.ext.ServletContainerLauncher.getName()Ljava/lang/String;
at
Comment by tamplinjohn:
Are you trying to use it with GWT 1.6? That isn't going to work.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Scott Blum sco...@google.com wrote:
Instant hosted mode should really change the game, right? We will no
longer be speculatively compiling anything for TypeOracle since we'll be
using class files that should already exist.
The problem is that if there is no
Matt,
I created a Wave Advanced GWT Compiler Optimizations and invited
you to it. Anyone who sends me their sandbox ID, I will invite. I am
using it to collect non-trivial optimizations in an outline draft
where we can discuss them. As a first pass, I entered the idea of
Unfortunately I wasn't able to attend Google I/O, however I did watch a few
of the sessions online.
I signed up for the sandbox, but it appears that google aren't going to
grant access to non IO attendees for a little while yet.
I'd appreciate an invite, but I understand if that's not feasible.
@Scott,
Per our IM conversation, I've renamed the new concept to
GwtScriptOnly. Could you check this over once more before I commit it?
@John,
Thanks for the review.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/34836
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
I am getting this error after downloading the latest rev from the trunk
(5568?). I get the same error in Hosted Browser and OOPHM.
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
com.google.gwt.dev.shell.StandardGeneratorContext.init(Lcom/google/
gwt/dev/javac/CompilationState;Lcom/google/gwt/dev/cfg/
I agree, although I find having a wiki with inline response rather
convenient. Here is what I have so far from the Wave, at the end, there is
a possible to solution to the problem of optimizing away the builder pattern
using general purpose optimizations.
-Ray
Advanced GWT Compiler Optimizations
Glanced over it, but I'm sure it's fine so I didn't fine-tooth it.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/34836
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
33 matches
Mail list logo
