Hi all, i try to run the scrolltable on gwt.1.6.4 for when i included
this line
dataTable.setHTML(i, 0, LAST_NAMES[Random.nextInt
(LAST_NAMES.length)]);
i get error
[WARN] Unexpectedly unable to fully resolve type
com.google.gwt.libideas.logging.shared.Log.1
but when i took out this line, no
Author: cromwellian
Date: Mon Jun 22 02:32:40 2009
New Revision: 5594
Added:
wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki
Log:
Created wiki page through web user interface.
Added: wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki
I may have missed something, but it's not clear exactly what and where the
project you're referring to is. If you could include a link to a project
page, that would be helpful.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Elad and Osnat osnat.no...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We will appreciate if you could
Comment by andres.a.testi:
There is a typo in the second snippet from the Local Variable Allocation
section. Variable s2 should be s. BTW, cool work!
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations
Reviewers: ewa_google.com, jat,
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44801/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/hosted.html
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44801/diff/1/2#newcode254
Line 254: $hosted = decodeURIComponent($hosted);
Pretend these tabs are
Reviewers: Lex, scottb,
Message:
Review requested
Description:
I keep writing the same utility method in my Generator types to create a
JSNI reference to a given JMethod.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44802
Affected files:
M
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44802
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Thanks, John. Committed at r5595.
--
Bob Vawter
Google Web Toolkit Team
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 22 07:10:10 2009
New Revision: 5595
Modified:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JAbstractMethod.java
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/typeinfo/JConstructor.java
JUnitShell should be getting getCompilerOptions by inheritance from
com.google.gwt.dev.GWTShell, which means also from gwt-dev-${os}.jar rather
than gwt-user.jar.
If your GWT eclipse Plugin 1.0.1 is the Google Plugin for Eclipse, which
the version number suggests, be aware that it also installs a
Excellent. I agree that that's an annoying piece of code to keep
rewriting. -Lex
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:42 AM, b...@google.com wrote:
Reviewers: Lex, scottb,
Message:
Review requested
Description:
I keep writing the same utility method in my Generator types to create a
JSNI
On 2009/06/22 14:02:18, jat wrote:
There was a thread earlier about this same one-line fix. At the time
the first
question which went unanswered was why is it necessary -- if we are
convinced it
is, then I think there is a lot more work to do besides this fix.
I originally asserted that it
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:57 AM, j...@google.com wrote:
None of [g w t . h o s t e d] are in the list of reserved characters
from rfc3986:
reserved= gen-delims / sub-delims
gen-delims = : / / / ? / # / [ / ] / @
sub-delims = ! / $ / / ' / ( / ) / * / + / , /
; / =
Right, and we
Reviewers: scottb, Lex,
Message:
Request review.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44803/diff/1/2
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/js/JsInliner.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44803/diff/1/2#newcode916
Line 916: }
Actual changes are above. From here to the next comment
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44803
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 22 10:19:32 2009
New Revision: 5597
Modified:
trunk/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/js/JsInliner.java
trunk/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/js/JsInlinerTest.java
Log:
Fix JsInliner for mutually-recursive functions.
Patch by: bobv
Review by: spoon
Author: tamplinjohn
Date: Mon Jun 22 07:13:53 2009
New Revision: 5596
Modified:
wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki
Log:
Edited wiki page through web user interface.
Modified: wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki
==
--- wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 22 10:54:08 2009
New Revision: 5598
Modified:
branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/ (props changed)
branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/ServletContainer.java
(props changed)
Author: b...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 22 10:58:17 2009
New Revision: 5599
Modified:
branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt
Log:
Update branch-info.txt to reflect r5598.
Modified: branches/snapshot-2009.06.16-r5570/branch-info.txt
Ok, John and I talked through this together, and managed to come to a
reasonable compromise. The idea is that we will decode the entire
contents of location.search, which will lead to URLs like this:
http://foo.com/app?foo%XXbar%YYgwt.hosted%ZZlocalhost%WW8080
being treated the same as
Okay, we now have a suite of options. Does anyone see any
particularly strong reason to pick among them?
The options I see are:
1. Annotate the surrounding method with something like @RunAsyncName(Foo)
2. Use the fully-qualified method name surrounding the call.
3. Use the fully-qualified type
Here is a link to the project page
http://code.google.com/p/extractingfeature
Since we need to hand out this project very shortly - we will be happy
to get your remarks as soon as possible. Thanks!
On 22 יוני, 15:04, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
I may have missed something, but it's not
Great writeup. Thanks for bringing some organization to the thread. I agree
with you that #1 seems overall best after the analysis.
Now can we bikeshed about the annotation name? @RunAsyncName() seems harder
to understand than something that says code splitting, such as
@SplitPointName(Foo). After
Reviewers: scottb,
Message:
Requesting review.
@Scott, if you're still tied up from last week, let me know and I'll
kick this over to Lex, but I think that you might remember some of the
design details from the in-person chat we had about it.
Description:
The ArtificialRescue annotation is
Author: cromwellian
Date: Mon Jun 22 14:50:42 2009
New Revision: 5600
Modified:
wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations.wiki
Log:
Edited wiki page through web user interface.
Cleaned up formatting.
Fixed spelling/grammar in some places.
Added useful Wiki-linked for compiler theory stuff.
Added
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Evan Adams e...@google.com wrote:
I considered this approach when responding in the bug report but ended up
rejecting it.
The problem is that it flattens the query parameter space. Consider the
case where one of the query params is a continue url that has
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Evan Adams e...@google.com wrote:
The problem is that it flattens the query parameter space. Consider the
case where one of the query params is a continue url that has it's own
params. They will be encoded and this distinguishes the original-URI's
params
For those interested, I put up the optimization article on the wiki instead
of Wave, see it here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations
It surveys and documents some potentially promising areas to look at. My
suspicion is that a lot of Java idioms:
LGTM pending resolution of Evan's comment in the GWTC thread.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44801/diff/1002/8
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/hosted.html
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/44801/diff/1002/8#newcode254
Line 254: $hosted = $hosted;
Why do we
Comment by tamplinjohn:
In the last section, you have to be careful with using a plain JS object
for a HashMap, since that presumes certain knowledge about the keys (for
example that they are not reserved property names). Also, the for..in loop
probably needs a test for hashOwnProperty to
Reviewers: scottb,
Message:
Review requested.
Description:
Adds an Impl.getNameOf() method which ReplaceRebinds will replace with a
JNameOf node.
The JNameOf node is currently used internally to provide class literals
with meaningful names when class metadata has been compiled out of the
Comment by tamplinjohn:
Argh, wiki ate the brackets around the ArrayList code examples -- it should
have been:
{{{
list[0]='foo';
...
list = ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'];
}}}
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/AdvancedCompilerOptimizations
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Lex Spoonsp...@google.com wrote:
The options I see are:
1. Annotate the surrounding method with something like @RunAsyncName(Foo)
2. Use the fully-qualified method name surrounding the call.
3. Use the fully-qualified type name of the callback object.
4. Use
This seems like it could have very cool uses for GWT Exporter, GQuery, and
fake introspection stuff. I was experimenting one time with a Builder
pattern that generated Javascript code at runtime by building up a string
and evaling it, and this would seem like the perfect way to do it.
-Ray
On
+1 Ian! Great point. Not sure why we didn't think of that before.
On Monday, June 22, 2009, Ian Petersen ispet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Lex Spoonsp...@google.com wrote:
The options I see are:
1. Annotate the surrounding method with something like
Comment by benzheren:
I check out trunk #5602 and I am using it on Mac. According to this
instruction, I need to do both: remove -XstartOnFirstThread and SWT jar. I
only did the first one and OOPHM seems to be working for me. Does it matter
if I do not remove SWT jar from gwt-dev-mac
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 22 15:13:11 2009
New Revision: 5601
Modified:
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/OptionElement.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/TableSectionElement.java
trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/PrefixTree.java
Log:
Fixes
Comment by kugutsumen:
How do you remove XstartOnFirstThread from the launch config arguments?
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Mon Jun 22 15:50:05 2009
New Revision: 5602
Modified:
releases/1.6/branch-info.txt
releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/OptionElement.java
releases/1.6/user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/TableSectionElement.java
39 matches
Mail list logo
