Revision: 5901
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 23:05:01 2009
Log: Revert r5894, as it leads to an invalid platform ABI for the Mac
plugin.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5901
Modified:
/trunk/plugins/config.mk
/trunk/plugins/xpcom/Makefile
===
> I agree with jsautocfg64.h, but the others look platform-independent. Do
> having them there cause problems for the Mac build?
In gecko-1.9.1:
The prcpucfg.h file differs between platforms. The version in
gecko-1.9.1/include causes problems for the mac build.
D gecko-sdks/gecko-1.9.1/in
Revision: 5900
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 21:32:01 2009
Log: branch-info.txt for snapshot-2009.08.04-r5888
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5900
Added:
/branches/snapshot-2009.08.04-r5888/branch-info.txt
===
--- /d
Revision: 5899
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 21:12:37 2009
Log: Creating the 2009-08-04 snapshot branch at r5888
svn copy -r 5888 \
https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk \
https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/branches/snapshot-2009.08.04-r5888
http://co
Revision: 5898
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 21:01:59 2009
Log: Reverting changes 5889 through 5892 in tools and trunk,
due to build breakage
svn merge -r5892:5888 .
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5898
Modified:
/trunk/dev/core/build.xml
/trunk/ecli
Revision: 5897
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 20:57:41 2009
Log: Rolling back tools and trunk r5889 through 5892 due to
build break
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5897
Added:
/tools/lib/xerces/serializer-2.7.1.jar
/tools/lib/xerces/xercesImpl-2.8.1.ja
Revision: 5895
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 19:11:11 2009
Log: Add libraries for certain distros of FF3.0.11 on Linux x86_64, and a
text
file to keep track of what has been added and what remains.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5895
Added:
/plugin-sd
Revision: 5894
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 18:39:55 2009
Log: Makefile changes to support Mac builds.
Patch by: sgross
Review by: jat
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5894
Modified:
/trunk/plugins/config.mk
/trunk/plugins/xpcom/Makefile
=
Revision: 5893
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 18:36:11 2009
Log: Add gecko libraries for FF2, FF3, and FF3.5 on Mac.
Patch by: sgross
Review by: jat
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5893
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-1.8/Darwin-gcc3/README.txt
/pl
Revision: 5892
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 18:31:51 2009
Log: (i) Pulls htmlunit dependencies in gwt_dev_jar
(ii) Updates the user/build.xml accordingly
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5892
Modified:
/trunk/
Revision: 5891
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 18:16:14 2009
Log: Updates the eclipse .classpath files for gwt-user project to match the
tools/xerces update (c5889).
Patch by: amitmanjhi
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5891
Modified:
/trunk/eclipse/
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Sam Gross wrote:
> A gecko-sdks/gecko-1.9.1/Darwin-gcc3/bin/xpidl
>
This file appears to be just i386 (at least according to the Linux file
command) -- does it need to be a universal binary or do we need to provide
a way of running an architecture-dependent
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Sam Gross wrote:
> (1)
>
> Here's a patch that adds gecko-1.9.1 for Mac and libxpcomglue_s.a for
> gecko-1.8 and gecko-1.9.0. I also included some files that are needed
> for the executable_path in gecko 1.9.0.
>
> http://web.mit.edu/sgross/www/gwt/gecko-sdks-darw
Revision: 5890
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 17:37:05 2009
Log: Updates the htmlunit dependencies and restores the test.web.htmlunit
test target.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5890
Modified:
/trunk/user/bu
Revision: 5889
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 17:30:52 2009
Log: I had added these dependencies to get htmlunit working. However, we
have more
recent versions of these libraries in the tools dir and upgrading to them is
not breaking htmlunit. The xercesImpl-2.8.1 jar was also con
Hi John,
I'm glad to see the Gecko SDKs landed in SVN. Here are three sets of
changes so that the plugin can be built for Firefox 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5
on the Mac.
(1)
Here's a patch that adds gecko-1.9.1 for Mac and libxpcomglue_s.a for
gecko-1.8 and gecko-1.9.0. I also included some files that
Comment by tamplinjohn:
Opera is unlikely to ever be supported -- they don't have an open extension
API that provides the access to the JS interpreter needed, and the NPAPI
support is very limited.
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM
--~--~
Comment by m...@oizo.biz:
I need opera plugin too
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~-
The current implementation of the ImageResourceGenerator works very
well for most of the browsers. However in IE6 you have the problem
that it will convert everything to the PNG format (also if it was a
GIF before). In IE6 you will need to add a filter to display
transparent PNGs correctly. Theses
Revision: 5888
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 15:18:29 2009
Log: Turn on batching mode for disableClassMetaData and draftCompile, now
that John
has increased the timeout limit for slow-script-warnings
Patch by: amitmanjhi
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/deta
> AFAICT, what's happening here is that the layout works "properly" in the
> sense that the tables inside the various LayoutPanels are in fact laid out
> as requested. The problem is that children nested *inside* table cells don't
> take up the entire cell in standards mode, even if their width/hei
Revision: 5887
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 12:55:36 2009
Log: This patch adds emma code coverage statistics to the output of an ant
test when emma.enabled is set.
Patch by: jlabanca
Review by: fabbott
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5887
Modified:
Reviewers: bobv, amitmanjhi,
Description:
This implements the new protocol messages, but doesn't currently do
anything with the additional data provided -- that will be in a later
patch.
Amit, I am including you on this review because you need to be familiar
with this code anyway for your HtmlUn
Revision: 5886
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 12:08:38 2009
Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5886
Modified:
/wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki
===
--- /wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki Wed
Bump. =)
This makes development in IE7 quite challenging. It seems odd that nobody
else has come across this issue thus far, so I may very well be insane or
missing something.
- Amir
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Amir Kashani wrote:
> If possible, could someone who is familiar with the Client
Revision: 5885
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 12:08:19 2009
Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5885
Modified:
/wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki
===
--- /wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki Thu
We're shooting for a milestone drop in a few weeks, and we're planning
for an RC by the end of the quarter. But, you know how predicting
dates goes...
On 8/4/09, Claudemir Todo Bom wrote:
>
> is there an ETA for 2.0?
>
> On Aug 4, 10:42 am, Ray Ryan wrote:
>> How does today strike you? It's he
Sorry for the bogus whitespace changes, I will clean that up before
submit.
BTW, since we have to coordinate changing the Java code with updating
the plugins, my plan was to check in source changes and xpcom prebuilt
components (but not any of the XPIs or other install images) first, and
then coo
Reviewers: bobv,
Description:
This is the native-code portion of the changes to the OOPHM wire
protocol and initialization sequence.
The common code and XPCOM changes have been tested, the IE and WebKit
changes have not so there may be obvious errors there (especially since
I am not familiar wit
Revision: 5884
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 08:41:57 2009
Log: Changing the preference max_script_run_time in
mozilla-1.7.12/greprefs/all.js from 10 seconds to 60 seconds to prevent
slow script warnings in tests on slow systems, which breaks the build.
Patch by: jlabanca
Revie
Revision: 5883
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 08:05:56 2009
Log: Fixing missing Layout module include.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5883
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/User.gwt.xml
===
--- /trunk/user/
Revision: 5882
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 07:51:26 2009
Log: Minor tweaks to Layout code in response to post-TBR review.
Review: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5882
Modified:
/trunk/user/javadoc/com/google/gwt
Committed at r5882.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6
File user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/Layout.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6#newcode495
Line 495: public void onAttached() {
On 2009/08/05 14:34:34, jlabanca wrote:
> Should be onAttach(
LGTM
Just change onAttached/onDetached to onAttach/onDetach.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6
File user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/Layout.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6#newcode495
Line 495: public void onAttached() {
Should be onAttach(
Since this was committed TBR last night, I've added all the changes
discussed here to http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51830/diff/2003/2004
File user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/LayoutPanelExample.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com
Reviewers: jlabanca,
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804
Affected files:
M user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/LayoutPanelExample.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/Layout.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/LayoutImpl.java
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Sami Jaber wrote:
>
> We considered doing something like this originally, and I think it's the
>> right approach for Swing/SWT. However, when you have to implement these
>> layouts in (...) impossible to change a panel's layout after it's
>> constructed, because it
Revision: 5881
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 06:36:35 2009
Log: Add Linux x86 FF3 libraries.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5881
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-1.9.0/Linux_x86-gcc3/lib/libmozjs.so
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-1.9.0/Linux_x86-gcc
The GWT standard widgets already have custom parsers built for them.
DockPanel, DisclosurePanel, Menubar, etc. all work just fine despite their
wonky api needs. The bug here is that you can't indulge in similar glue for
your custom widgets yet. No Google team has found that to be a problem with
the
> We considered doing something like this originally, and I think it's the
> right approach for Swing/SWT. However, when you have to implement these
> layouts in (...) impossible to change a panel's layout after it's
> constructed, because it forces you to reconstruct the entire DOM.
>
I understan
Whoops, thanks Ray.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5878
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~---
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the response I created the issue, here is the link
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/issues/detail?id=297
Cheers
Gabriel
On Jul 31, 2:09 pm, Joel Webber wrote:
> Gabriel,
> If you could enter an issue for this and cc' me on it, that would be great.
> It'
Just a question, and a comment. First the comment. Thank you for
getting this up into the repo, in whatever state. Second, it was
commented that Adwords and a few other projects have vetted this over
the past year. How does this jibe with the deficiencies outlined?
For example, not being able
You made my week!
On Aug 4, 10:42 pm, Ray Ryan wrote:
> How does today strike you? It's headed into gwt trunk, and will be
> part of the 2.0 release.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 4, 2009, brett.wooldridge
> wrote:
>
> > Ping. This not "this month" any more, it's "early next". Got a
> > revise
44 matches
Mail list logo
