Thanks for the patch. I agree with John that this is way too late for 2.0 at
this point. I will get back to this for 2.1. Please file a public issue for
this refactoring and attach the patch to that.
Regards,
Amit
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 6:41 PM, wrote:
> I really think this is too big a change
I really think this is too big a change to make between the RC and the
final release. I would rather wait until after we ship 2.0 and spend a
bit more time on it to clean up some of the other rough edges before
getting it into trunk.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/114801
--
http://groups.
OK, ignore this one; I was patiently waiting for the "Please navigate X
browsers to this URL" when I realized the stdout was redirected. So back
to remote and selenium tests :-(
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/114802
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: jat,
Description:
This patch adds "-runStyle Manual" test targets to user/build.xml; the
number of clients is set in the ${gwt.hosts.web.manual} and
${gwt.hosts.dev.manual} properties.
This is a follow-up to our discussion at
http://groups.google.fr/group/google-web-toolkit-contributor
Ping!
will it make it into GWT 2.0? seems unlikely unfortunately, whereas the
patch was "LGTM" three months ago :-(
I'm submitting an updated patch, just in case, as the tests were changed
due to FF3.5 supporting CORS (i.e. not throwing an exception in the
cross-origin test)
http://gwt-code-revi
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:08 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>
>> Do you think HtmlUnit integration is stable enough so this refactoring
>> could happen before 2.0 ship? (I could –try to– contribute the
>> refactoring in time, if needed)
>
> Such a
Reviewers: amitmanjhi,
Description:
There's a TODO(amitmanjhi) in HtmlUnitSessionHandler to refactor
SessionHandler, and the current situation makes it impossible for me to
implement OOPHM in Adobe AIR (well, unless I write a full-fledged OOPHM
client).
So here's a patch that factors out a Sessio
On 2009/09/03 19:48:25, jgw wrote:
> On 2009/08/26 15:21:26, t.broyer wrote:
> >
> Just so you know, I haven't forgotten about this, but I'm really
swamped this
> week. I'm out next week, but will have a look at this as soon as I get
back
> (unless someone else beats me to it).
Just so you know ;
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Well, actually, it wouldn't change much things for me at the moment
> 'cause HtmlUnit is too deeply nested into GWT's internals (many direct
> references to HtmlUnitSessionHandler instead of e.g. a factored-out
> SessionHandlerClient, whic
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:16 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>>
>> I don't think that's what you really want though; it seems like
>> RunStyle was meant to be public so you can extend it in any package
>> you like, and then pass the FQN of your cla
Try this:
richTextArea.getFormatter().setJustification(Justification.FULL);
The RichTextArea uses execCommand() to modify the currently selected
contents of the editable area. Some of the inputs to execCommand() do not
match similar CSS style names exactly.
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.c
Does one app make heavier use of CssResource than the other? A bell is
ringing about mhtml security concerns. Or did we back out our mhtml use?
On Nov 28, 2009 7:22 AM, "Thomas Broyer" wrote:
On 28 nov, 12:29, dflorey wrote: > Thanks for your
suggestion! I've uplo...
My boss is using Avira on h
On 28 nov, 12:29, dflorey wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion! I've uploaded a generated file and will
> post the response to this thread.
> I was wondering if all gwt-generated files will be classified as
> malware by Avira or if it depends on some generated javascript
> snippets.
My boss is u
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> the -runStyle argument documentation from JUnitShell says you can pass
> the fully qualified name of a class. What it doesn't say, first,
> thought that's somehow implicit, is that this class has to extend
> RunStyle.
> But RunStyle is pack
Hi all,
the -runStyle argument documentation from JUnitShell says you can pass
the fully qualified name of a class. What it doesn't say, first,
thought that's somehow implicit, is that this class has to extend
RunStyle.
But RunStyle is package-protected, forcing you to put your class in
the com.go
Thanks for your suggestion! I've uploaded a generated file and will
post the response to this thread.
I was wondering if all gwt-generated files will be classified as
malware by Avira or if it depends on some generated javascript
snippets.
On Nov 24, 4:58 pm, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> The best appr
16 matches
Mail list logo
