Thanks Joel.
My current workaround is to use the "old" Horizontal/VerticalPanel widgets,
so "no harm, no foul". Looking forward to more examples!
Stuart
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Joel Webber wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> Hiding/showing layers is slightly tricky (or at least non-obvious). I'm
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> 2. onerror works some of the time in some of the browsers. It fails on
> various combinations of resolve errors, error status codes and other failure
> conditions. For all browsers (except Opera) that don't support it directly,
> It can be
On 2009/12/01 06:34:15, Ray Ryan wrote:
> Joel, can you review this? In fact, can you submit it for me, since it
seems
> like you early rising Atlantoids may roll GA before I get in?
> Also, I haven't doc'd LayoutPanel itself, because I don't quite
understand its
> constraints. Have it in you?
LG
Reviewers: Ray Ryan,
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115804
Affected files:
M user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/StackLayoutPanel.java
Index: user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/StackLayoutPanel.java
diff --git a/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/Stack
On 1-Dec-09, at 7:51 AM, Lex Spoon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Matt Mastracci > wrote:
>> 2. onerror works some of the time in some of the browsers. It
>> fails on
>> various combinations of resolve errors, error status codes and
>> other failure
>> conditions. For all browser
Ray/Lex,
I'm starting to think that the dynamic iframe might not be a bad first
approach to this problem either. A single linker would be able to
provide cross-domain-capable, multi-module-safe code that doesn't
require any additional post-processing to support loading of
fragments. It a
Thanks for the test code and data, Matt! It sounds like enough
browsers are covered that error reporting is no longer a major decider
between XHR vs. script tags.
Regarding iframes, be aware that some GWT users can't use them. I
don't know all the reasons why, but one example reason is that ifra
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115804
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: robertvawter_google.com,
Description:
Some GWT users want to build GWT RPC requests themselves, e.g. via
building a raw HTML form. To do this, they need to supply the RPC
policy name as part of the request, just like GWT RPC normally does.
How shall they get the policy name?
This patc
To be clear, I don't know of any cases where people *can't* use iframes.
There are some cases where teams have chosen to use
Revision: 7218
Author: sco...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 09:29:17 2009
Log: Cherry picking trunk c7178, c7185 into 2009.11.20 snapshot.
- Fixes CustomButton's ability to have a text body
- UiBinder AttributeParsers can now distinguish "" from null
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/sourc
For clarification, I've included an approximation of what I meant by
dynamic iframe.
The idea is to create the iframe using src='javascript:;' to keep it
in the same domain as the parent iframe, use document.write() to
initialize a full HTML document inside of it, and finally, add scripts
Access to the strong name isn't available anywhere else. LGTM, but add
a test to RemoteServiceServletTest to at least assert that the return
value is non-null.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115805
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM. Aside from documentation and naming, there is one question about
which nodes are re-added to the worklist in the solver.
Can you post a large enough set of code to include an actual analysis
and optimization? I don't think we should commit any of this code until
there it is causing at leas
Hey all,
I installed the GPE 2.0-RC2 build (after cleaning out the old one) and
I'm running into some issues. The plugin thinks that we're using the
old-style layout, so it's attempting to launch GWTShell which won't
initialize a local Jetty w/war.xml.
I've worked around it by creating a lo
@Miguel: I've hit this before when upgrading projects, and I keep forgetting
what the trick was. I seem to recall the plugin was making the project
layout determination at the time the GWT nature is added, but I'm not 100%
certain.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Matt Mastracci wrote:
> Hey all,
Ahh - there's a webAppNature in .project that gets set when you enable
GWT. I disabled GWT support, re-added it and now the .project has a
"com.google.gdt.eclipse.core.webAppNature".
This seems to be the trigger for enabling DevMode vs. GWTShell.
Thanks,
Matt.
On 1-Dec-09, at 1:57 PM, Joel
That is right, at the time that the project is GWT-enabled it checks for the
existence of a war/WEB-INF/web.xml. If that exists it will think that it is
dealing with a war-style project and then it will use the HostedMode if it
is available or DevMode when launching the application. With that ver
One correction: When launching web apps, we use DevMode if the SDK supports
it and HostedMode otherwise.
2009/12/1 Miguel Méndez
> That is right, at the time that the project is GWT-enabled it checks for
> the existence of a war/WEB-INF/web.xml. If that exists it will think that
> it is dealing
Revision: 7219
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 13:59:12 2009
Log: Javadoc fixes.
Patch by: jat
Review by: jgw (desk)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7219
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/i18n/client/DateTimeFormat.java
/trunk/user/src/com/google/g
Revision: 7220
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 14:05:14 2009
Log: Merge trunk r7219 into this branch
Javadoc fixes.
svn merge --ignore-ancestry -c7219 \
https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ .
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7220
Forwarding since I wasn't member of the group.
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: Flow analysis framework definition and solver.
To: sp...@google.com,
google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com,
cromwell...@google.com
Reviewers:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
> I can create a separate CFG changelist + CFG-based analyses changelist.
> I just worry that I will have to maintain several changelist branches +
> main branch with all the code together. I would certainly prefer to land
> this code into SVN even before it
> Well, it would be sitting in svn and not being tested in any way
> except that it compiles. If you want to commit the pieces somewhere,
> why don't we make an svn branch?
I don't think svn branch will help much. It will only add headaches.
What do you say if I would merge all LGTM'ed changes to
Reviewers: jgw,
Description:
UiBinderTest requires >256k stack size. This patch increases the stack
size to 512k.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115806
Affected files:
common.ant.xml
Index: common.ant.xml
==
Revision: 7221
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 15:17:53 2009
Log: Fix for hosted.html missing plugin warning in IE7+ quirks mode.
Found by: cramsdale
Patch by: scottb
Review by: jgw (desk check)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7221
Modified:
/trunk/dev/core/s
On 2009/12/01 15:32:21, jgw wrote:
> On 2009/12/01 06:34:15, Ray Ryan wrote:
> > Joel, can you review this? In fact, can you submit it for me, since
it seems
> > like you early rising Atlantoids may roll GA before I get in?
> >
> > Also, I haven't doc'd LayoutPanel itself, because I don't quite
und
Revision: 7222
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 15:21:09 2009
Log: Increasing the stack size when running JUnit tests because
UiBinderTest requires more than 256k.
Patch by: jlabanca
Review by: jat
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7222
Modified:
/trunk
Revision: 7223
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 15:21:10 2009
Log: Adding UiBinder doc for widgets that require it.
Review: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/116803
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7223
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/
Revision: 7224
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 15:25:46 2009
Log: tr...@7222 was merged into this branch
Increase stack size of JUnit tests.
svn merge --ignore-ancestry -c7222
https://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ .
Patch by: jlabanca
http://code.google.com/p
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Mike Aizatsky wrote:
>> Well, it would be sitting in svn and not being tested in any way
>> except that it compiles. If you want to commit the pieces somewhere,
>> why don't we make an svn branch?
>
> I don't think svn branch will help much. It will only add headac
Revision: 7225
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 15:35:53 2009
Log: Removes the use of FinallyCommand in StackLayoutPanel. This works
around
a Scheduler bug that's causing StackLayoutPanel to misbehave slightly.
Review: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115804
http://code.google.com/p/go
On 2009/12/01 16:45:14, Ray Ryan wrote:
> LGTM
Committed at r7225.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115804
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115806
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
> Sounds good. Git is optional; please do if it's easy, but don't worry
> if it's not. I can patch in multiple patches just fine.
I use git for development anyway.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Mike Aizatsky wrote:
>>> Well, it would be sit
Revision: 7226
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 16:25:52 2009
Log: Fixes issues 2907, 4277 and 4278.
Also fixes mail icon showing up in front of the about dialog.
Review: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/113801
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7226
Modified:
Comment by vincent.case:
I found these UiBinder use cases very helpful in understanding the APIs.
However, I am unable to determine if UIBinder addresses the gwt 1.7 issues
I have with formatting my app layout using CSS.
Specifically,
* HTML generated by gwt layout widgets is not transparen
All,
I found myself needing band-aids (read: bleeding edge) while trying
out TabLayoutPanel.
1) The javadocs and code for TabLayoutPanel suggest that the gwt-
TabLayoutPanel(*) css selectors exist:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/releases/2.0/user/src/com/google/gwt/use
Comment by j...@google.com:
@vincent.case: It's not clear precisely what you're referring to when you
reference the "gwt layout widgets". Are you referring to the new
*LayoutPanel structures or the existing panels such as DockPanel,
Horizontal/VerticalPanel and such? The existing panels deri
Ping. This is fairly urgent.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/115803
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 7227
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 21:26:37 2009
Log: Merging /trunk c7221, c7223, c7225, c7226 into this branch.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7227
Modified:
/releases/2.0/branch-info.txt
/releases/2.0/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/li
The following CSS rules should work fine with the TabLayoutPanel as checked
in:
.gwt-TabLayoutPanel { }
.gwt-TabLayoutPanelTabs { }
.gwt-TabLayoutPanelTab { }
.gwt-TabLayoutPanelTab .gwt-TabLayoutPanelTabInner { }
.gwt-TabLayoutPanelTab-selected { }
.gwt-TabLayoutPanelTab-selected .gwt-TabLayoutPa
Revision: 7228
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 22:01:22 2009
Log: Fixing TabLayoutPanel tab stacking (float -> cssFloat).
Review: jlabanca (tbr)
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7228
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/TabLayoutPanel.java
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7228
This was a mistake on my part. Some browsers (e.g., Firefox) won't accept
elem.style['float'], but rather require elem.style['cssFloat'].
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Joel,
Is there something "special" that I need to do in my ui.xml in order to get
these CSS rules applied to my TabLayoutPanel?
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/files/xhtml.ent";>
... ui style ... src? type? empty? do I add {style.*} styles to the XML
below?
First Tabfirst tab
c
Revision: 7229
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Tue Dec 1 22:03:38 2009
Log: Merging /trunk r7228 into this branch.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7229
Modified:
/releases/2.0/branch-info.txt
/releases/2.0/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/TabLayoutPanel.java
Dear John,
I would like to thank you for your response. We were working with GWT 1.7
and now we have to upgrade to 2.0.
Thanks,
Nicolas
2009/11/28 John LaBanca
> Try this:
> richTextArea.getFormatter().setJustification(Justification.FULL);
>
> The RichTextArea uses execCommand() to modify the cu
47 matches
Mail list logo
