On Feb 8, 10:04 pm, Brendan Kenny wrote:
> On Feb 8, 6:34 pm, Luiz Mineo wrote:
>
> > On 8 fev, 13:23, John Tamplin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Luiz Mineo wrote:
> > > > I'm dedicating some of my time to develop a small framework, to help
> > > > me create and maintain big GWT
On Feb 8, 6:34 pm, Luiz Mineo wrote:
> On 8 fev, 13:23, John Tamplin wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Luiz Mineo wrote:
> > > I'm dedicating some of my time to develop a small framework, to help
> > > me create and maintain big GWT apps. I'm already doing some really
> > > useful thing
On 8 fev, 13:23, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Luiz Mineo wrote:
> > I'm dedicating some of my time to develop a small framework, to help
> > me create and maintain big GWT apps. I'm already doing some really
> > useful things with generators, but one of my objectives is o
On 8 fév, 10:17, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
> I'm thinking in starting a Wave about how I think event handling
> should be refactored.
Done: https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252Bux7zL81XA
Still "To Be Continued", and I'll try to work on a patch later on if I
find some ti
There was a problem with the patch upload -- the modified files didn't
show up, perhaps they don't match svn trunk.
I assume I18N pulls in client/shared, and inherits RegExp. The one
concern I have is that means that RegExp gets pulled in by User, and
that code will wind up always being used if
Revision: 7536
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Feb 8 13:54:28 2010
Log: Revert of 7535, which wrongly had trunk/trunk
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7536
Deleted:
/trunk/trunk
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: ,
Description:
BidiUtils - utility functions for performing common BiDi tests on
strings, such as direction estimation.
BidiFormatter - utility class for formatting text for display in a
potentially opposite-direction context without garbling.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-re
LVGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Scott,
Here's an updated patch that removes the parameterizations. Per our
IM conversation, a JNewArray is inappropriate because Java annotations
are restricted to single-dimension arrays.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contrib
Revision: 7533
Author: sp...@google.com
Date: Mon Feb 8 09:07:00 2010
Log: Adding branch-info.txt.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=7533
Added:
/branches/gflow/branch-info.txt
===
--- /dev/null
+++ /branches/gflow/branch-info.txt
Sounds exciting. Looking forward to your patches.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Tomer Greenberg wrote:
> I'm working on a new class named AutoDirHandler, which is supposed to
> listen on keypress events and adjust the directionality of the TA / TB as
> you type. The AutoDirHandler is a private
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:53 AM, wrote:
> On 2010/02/03 20:16:51, Ray Ryan wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason to limit this to RuntimeException rather than
>>
> Exception?
>
> Not particularly; I did RuntimeException because #dispatch doesn't throw
> any checked exceptions. Could change to Exception
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130812/diff/1/2
File
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/gflow/constants/AssumptionDeducer.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/130812/diff/1/2#newcode135
Line 135: // Only last expression can be reverse engineered.
Either htis comment is inn
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810/diff/4001/4003
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JAnnotation.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810/diff/4001/4003#newcode40
Line 40: public static class Property extends
I guess I kind of see that, but it seems like a lot o
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Luiz Mineo wrote:
> I'm dedicating some of my time to develop a small framework, to help
> me create and maintain big GWT apps. I'm already doing some really
> useful things with generators, but one of my objectives is offer the
> option to create a lot of modules,
Wow, 2010 already. Fixed.
Thanks,
John LaBanca
jlaba...@google.com
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 8:52 AM, jim n wrote:
> can you name it 2010x please?
>
>
>
> On Feb 4, 8:19 am, Ray Ryan wrote:
> > And the jar is posted. All better?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Ray Ryan wrot
Hi there.
I'm dedicating some of my time to develop a small framework, to help
me create and maintain big GWT apps. I'm already doing some really
useful things with generators, but one of my objectives is offer the
option to create a lot of modules, without the need to maintain a lot
of *.gwt.xml
Hello,
I have noticed that concurrency can be improved at many places in the
code.
A few simple examples:
Concurrenthashmap would be good replacement for :
serializationPolicyCache in RemoteServiceServlet
serviceToImplementedInterfacesMap in both the RPC classes
sHttpDateFormat in HttpHeaders c
can you name it 2010x please?
On Feb 4, 8:19 am, Ray Ryan wrote:
> And the jar is posted. All better?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> > Sorry, we'll get a 2.0.1 incubator jar up today.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 7:04 AM, stuckagain wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> The
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810/diff/4001/4003
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/ast/JAnnotation.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/134810/diff/4001/4003#newcode40
Line 40: public static class Property extends
The templated formulation allows the .of() method to
20 matches
Mail list logo
