[gwt-contrib] Re: Implemented Array and descendants as overlay types. Simplified Assertion convenience methods. Fi... (issue605801)

2010-06-14 Thread rchandia
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/605801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8246 committed - Part 1 of reimplementing DevMode JSO implementation to remove the need...

2010-06-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 8246 Author: b...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 14 05:46:15 2010 Log: Part 1 of reimplementing DevMode JSO implementation to remove the need for global state. Add SingleJsoImpl annotation http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/473801 Patch by: bobv Review by: scottb

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8248 committed - Add new LongLib test case...

2010-06-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 8248 Author: r...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 14 08:04:23 2010 Log: Add new LongLib test case Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/607801 Review by: j...@google.com http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8248 Added:

[gwt-contrib] Possible breaking changes to JavaScriptObject in DevMode

2010-06-14 Thread BobV
If you use JavaScriptObjects, r8249 changes Dev (Hosted) Mode in three ways you might care about. Production (Web) mode behavior is unaffected by this change. 1) Method invocations on null JSO instances will throw a NullPointerException instead of quasi-succeeding [1]. This should help catch

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix issue 4423 - RPC ProxyCreator doesn't support methods with Type Parameters (issue575801)

2010-06-14 Thread spoon
Thank you for the minified example. I'll follow up on the issue. http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4423 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/575801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: A new model for external types (issue589801)

2010-06-14 Thread scottb
Hearing no objections, I'm going to commit this. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/589801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8253 committed - Adds Class.getName() to JavaAstConstructor...

2010-06-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 8253 Author: sco...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 14 12:57:05 2010 Log: Adds Class.getName() to JavaAstConstructor Patch by: tobyr Review by: me http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8253 Modified: /trunk/dev/core/test/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/JavaAstConstructor.java

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8254 committed - UiBinder now uses the ResourceOracle. Includes changes to...

2010-06-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 8254 Author: rj...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 14 13:37:36 2010 Log: UiBinder now uses the ResourceOracle. Includes changes to GwtResourceEntityResolver to make sure sax does so too. Patch contributed by markovuksano...@gmail.com with gentle guidance from sco...@google.com.

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8255 committed - A new model for external types...

2010-06-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 8255 Author: sco...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 14 14:39:55 2010 Log: A new model for external types http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/589801/show Patch by: tobyr Review by: me, bobv http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8255 Deleted:

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r8256 committed - Tweak JavaAstConstructor's copy of Class to match emulation API....

2010-06-14 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 8256 Author: sco...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 14 15:07:00 2010 Log: Tweak JavaAstConstructor's copy of Class to match emulation API. Review by: tobyr http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8256 Modified:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Introducing the Abstractizer compiler optimization (issue 4893) (issue609801)

2010-06-14 Thread Bruce Johnson
50%? That would be astonishing, but I must admit I'm skeptical :-) Thomas, have you tried it on a bigger app? Something like Showcase or the Expense Report app? On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Lex Spoon sp...@google.com wrote: It's a fun idea! Methods that are only there for their type