patch updated with some mac build fixups and the public key is now
embedded in the manifest so that packed/unpacked use the same well known
URI for the background page.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1084801/diff/28001/29022
File plugins/npapi/manifest-template.json (right):
http://gwt-cod
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1084801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: jat,
Description:
Updates the reference api for Api Checker to 2.1. Fixes 2 small bugs in
Api Checker.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: jat
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1095801/show
Affected files:
M build.xml
A tools/api-checker/config/gwt21_22userAp
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/3001/4001
File samples/build.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/3001/4001#newcode46
samples/build.xml:46:
On 2010/11/09 22:11:55, rchandia wrote:
This should be if we want the
ValidationTck
sample to appear in the g
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On 2010/11/09 22:11:55, rchandia wrote:
This probably needs a README file to help users run the tests.
I am not sure where the right place to put all of this code is.
This not really a sample but a HACK to run the Technology Compatibility
Kit for JSR 303.
See
http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/st
We're working on GWT 2.1.1 right now, largely to address a lot of
RequestFactory shortcomings. I can't commit to a date other than "a lot
faster than usual." The specifics are being tracked here:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/RequestFactory_2_1_1
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:41 A
committed as r9203
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1078801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
committed as r9201
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1089801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
LGTM
Nice! Thanks.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1094801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
committed as r9205
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
This probably needs a README file to help users run the tests.
I was not able to generate a gwt-x.y.z.zip containing the validationtck
sample is that intended?
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/3001/4001
File samples/build.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801
Revision: 9206
Author: zun...@google.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 09:34:36 2010
Log: Modifies the GWT compiler sharded entry points to support an
alternative
method of sharding where multiple instances of Precompile and CompilePerms
are invoked.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1074801
h
Revision: 9205
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 09:07:13 2010
Log: Fixing MultiSelectionModelTest to ensure that we are checking that the
correct value is not selected.
Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801
Review by: rchan...@google.com
http://code.google.com/
> We shouldn't get hung up on the fact that LengthAttributeParser is misnamed
> (ScalarAttributeParser?). Negative support sounds like the right thing to
> do. Element parsers that are concerned about negative values could do their
> own check for that, although it could be tricky to do correctly.
Revision: 9204
Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Nov 9 08:44:38 2010
Log: Public (konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com):
We need to provide at least some support for @UiField(provided) and
@UiFactory in GWT Designer. At design time we pass "null" as "owner", so
we need to use special design time
Reviewers: rjrjr,
Description:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse_thread/thread/9832f30485ce48e2
This patch contains:
1. tweak for LengthAttributeParser to support +/- before value;
2. check for negative width/height in LayoutPanelParser;
3. tests for negative
Revision: 9202
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Mon Nov 8 07:55:07 2010
Log: Cherry picking r9061, r9178, r9179, r9190 into release branch.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9202
Modified:
/releases/2.1/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/cellview/client/AbstractHasData.j
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:32 PM, wrote:
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2
> File tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf (right):
>
> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2#newcode99
> tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf:99:
> :com.google.gwt.c
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2
File tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/diff/1/2#newcode99
tools/api-checker/config/gwt20_21userApi.conf:99:
:com.google.gwt.core.client.impl\
This came up in a separate CL -- sho
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1093801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: jat,
Description:
This patch makes three changes:
1. Excludes the client-side validation from being analyzed by api
checker. Will
remove this unnecessary exclusion once
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5566 is
resolved.
Currently, because of this bug there i
Reviewers: kathrin,
Description:
Adds the compiler metrics output to the compiler report (soyc)
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1092801/show
Affected files:
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/linker/SoycReportLinker.java
M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/JavaT
will create RFC in Wave soon.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/diff/1/4
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/SyntheticModuleDef.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1043801/diff/1/4#newcode50
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/cfg/SyntheticModuleDef.java:50: public
sync
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We shouldn't get hung up on the fact that LengthAttributeParser is misnamed
(ScalarAttributeParser?). Negative support sounds like the right thing to
do. Element parsers that are concerned about negative values could do their
own check for that, although it could be tricky to do correctly.
Did you
committed as r9199
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1088801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Good catch. I created a patch to fix the test case.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1089801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: rchandia,
Description:
Fixing MultiSelectionModelTest to ensure that we are checking that the
correct value is not selected.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1091801/show
Affected files:
M user/test/com/google/gwt/view/client/MultiSelectionModelTest.java
One of the users of GWT Designer found that code like this causes
rendering failure.
As you can see, "left" attribute contains negative value.
In Java version such value is not problem for "left", "right", "top"
and "bottom".
As I can see, problem is in L
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1077802/diff/1/3
File user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/rebind/DesignTimeUtilsImpl.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1077802/diff/1/3#newcode52
user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/rebind/DesignTimeUtilsImpl.java:52:
w.write(" void handle(String pa
Comment by carasen12:
14196913
e3ccc434d9840ad19204bcdfc999
carasen12
http://gravatar.com/carasen12
carasen12
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/e3ccc434d9840ad19204bcdfc999
htt
why is com.google.gwt.user.client.ui.Widget.addHandler(H, Type)
protected? in case I want to fire a custom event on a widget so that
the widget is not aware of custom event handler, it makes it difficult
to manage.
thanks
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
34 matches
Mail list logo
