Re: [gwt-contrib] Domain type cannot be sent to client

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:48 PM, BobV wrote: >> Is this a known issue and is there a workaround I can try? > > Are the problematic types only reachable from the RequestFactory > interface through a parameterized List or Set? Yes, that's the case. -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-To

Re: [gwt-contrib] Domain type cannot be sent to client

> Is this a known issue and is there a workaround I can try? Are the problematic types only reachable from the RequestFactory interface through a parameterized List or Set? http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5559 -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team -- http://grou

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix a devmode.js reference to doc, which does not exist (issue1101801)

On 2010/11/12 00:14:03, unnurg wrote: LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1101801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9217 committed - Fix a devmode.js reference to doc, which does not exist...

Revision: 9217 Author: unn...@google.com Date: Thu Nov 11 13:14:44 2010 Log: Fix a devmode.js reference to doc, which does not exist Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1101801 Review by: con...@google.com http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9217 Modified: /tr

[gwt-contrib] Fix a devmode.js reference to doc, which does not exist (issue1101801)

Reviewers: conroy, Description: Fix a devmode.js reference to doc, which does not exist Review by: con...@google.com Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1101801/show Affected files: M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/core/ext/linker/impl/devmode.js Index: dev/core/src/com/

[gwt-contrib] Adds overflow-x and overflow-y to Style since they have at least partial (issue1100801)

Reviewers: jgw, Description: Adds overflow-x and overflow-y to Style since they have at least partial support on all browsers. Review by: j...@google.com Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1100801/show Affected files: M user/src/com/google/gwt/dom/client/Style.java In

[gwt-contrib] Re: Public: GWT version of the JSR 303 Bean Validation TCK (issue1085801)

I think it is better to take validationtck out of the general ant build. That way it will not get built into the distributable bits. A few modified files lack the "Modified by Google" notice. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/diff/40002/42001 File samples/build.xml (right): http://gw

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Issues 5479, 5507 and 5571 (and a few other editor-related tweaks) (issue1099801)

I'll take the rest of the review this afternoon. On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:06 AM, wrote: > BTW, I only reviewed the Number/Date classes, not everything. > > > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8 > File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLabel.java (right): > > http:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issues 5479, 5507 and 5571 (and a few other editor-related tweaks) (issue1099801)

BTW, I only reviewed the Number/Date classes, not everything. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8 File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLabel.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8#newcode34 user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLa

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issues 5479, 5507 and 5571 (and a few other editor-related tweaks) (issue1099801)

Thanks for the quick feedback! http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8 File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLabel.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8#newcode22 user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLabel.java:22: * A ValueLabel tha

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add a "ControllerBinder" in UiBinder so that UiHandlers can be bound on both the (issue923801)

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Zach van Schouwen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM, wrote: > >> interface FooView { >> interface Delegate { >>void saveClicked(); >>void cancelClicked(); >> } >> BarView getNestedBarView(); >> } >> > > Yeah, we've taken that approach on variou

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Internal compiler error with GWT 2.1.0 RC1 when using generics

Thanks. I was able to reproduce the problem and filed issue 5582 . @zhuyi: can you take a look at this bug? On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:58 AM, yves wrote: > Miguel, > > Here is the ResultNode class > > public class ResultNode> i

[gwt-contrib] Domain type cannot be sent to client

Hi, I've been fiddling with the latest RequestFactory code in gwt trunk. I keep coming across the following error message: "The domain type com.mtacit.rmddx.server.model.Email cannot be sent to the client". This occurs with quite a few of my domain types, in fact the domainToClientType map in Req

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

Changes actually posted this time. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

Feedbacked, PTAL http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/diff/1/2 File user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/Logging.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/diff/1/2#newcode45 user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/Logging.java:45: // by the deobfuscation co

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/show -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Internal compiler error with GWT 2.1.0 RC1 when using generics

Miguel, Here is the ResultNode class public class ResultNode> implements Result { private static final long serialVersionUID = -3560238969723137110L; public int dataType; public int id1; public int id2; public int id3; public int id4; publ

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Internal compiler error with GWT 2.1.0 RC1 when using generics

@yves: What does the ResultNode class look like? It is class ResultNode> but what about its supertype and fields? On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:50 AM, yves wrote: > Chris, > > JConsole does not succeed to connect to the java compilation : I get > an out of memory error in sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCP

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r9216 committed - Removing references to gecko user agent in favor of gecko1_8. gecko r...

Revision: 9216 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Thu Nov 11 05:24:51 2010 Log: Removing references to gecko user agent in favor of gecko1_8. gecko refers to very old versions of Mozilla, while gecko1_8 refers to all modern versions, including all versions of Firefox 2.0 and later. gecko was u

[gwt-contrib] Re: Internal compiler error with GWT 2.1.0 RC1 when using generics

Chris, JConsole does not succeed to connect to the java compilation : I get an out of memory error in sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport $AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop while trying to start a new thread. => Result: no data in jconsole The compiler is the one shipped with GWT 2.1.0RC1 I'll send yo

[gwt-contrib] Re: Issues 5479, 5507 and 5571 (and a few other editor-related tweaks) (issue1099801)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8 File user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLabel.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1099801/diff/1/8#newcode22 user/src/com/google/gwt/user/client/ui/NumberLabel.java:22: * A ValueLabel that uses {...@link DoubleRenderer}

[gwt-contrib] Issues 5479, 5507 and 5571 (and a few other editor-related tweaks) (issue1099801)

Reviewers: bobv, Description: This patch: - reuses editors in every IsEditor widget (issue 5479) - adds a ValueLabel widget, and DateLabel and NumberLabel subclasses (issue 5507), introduces a NumberFormatRenderer (similar to the existing DateTimeFormatRenderer) for use in NumberLabel (this one

[gwt-contrib] Re: Internal compiler error with GWT 2.1.0 RC1 when using generics

Hi All, @Scott The WARN does not change anything to the result. And to reduce the memory usage I already closed everything (Eclipse, MySQL service, Tomcat, ...) and ran the compilation as a command line. Naively I made a deep cleanup of my hard drive (defrag, optimization) in order to allow a high

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fixes issue http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5578 (issue1098801)

http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/diff/1/2 File user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/Logging.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1098801/diff/1/2#newcode45 user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/Logging.java:45: // by the deobfuscation code. Make this a bl

[gwt-contrib] Re: Using Request Factory with existing RDBMS Tables

On 9 nov, 21:13, Jack wrote: > We are facing a few challenges regarding the use of the RequestFactory > infrastructure with existing RDBMS tables and I wanted to be sure that > we understood the current restrictions as we would need to communicate > those restrictions to developers using our too