[gwt-contrib] Add test for builtin constraints (issue1458801)

2011-06-13 Thread nchalko
Reviewers: rchandia, Description: Add test for builtin constraints [JSR 303 TCK Result] 138 of 257 (53.70%) Pass with 11 Failures and 7 Errors. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1458801/ Affected files: A user/test-super/org/hibernate/jsr303/tck/super/org/hibernate/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updated rpc generator result caching for field serializers to use type signature instead of last... (issue1446818)

2011-06-13 Thread jbrosenberg
After consulting with Toby, I'm going to rework this patch, to try to only use the strong hash as a fallback, if no timestamp info is available. Try to take advantage of CompilationUnit.getLastModified() http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446818/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-T

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds hooks to Widget reduce MVP boilerplate and enshrines the app-wide EventBus. (issue1449817)

2011-06-13 Thread rjrjr
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449817/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Adds hooks to Widget reduce MVP boilerplate and enshrines the app-wide EventBus. (issue1449817)

2011-06-13 Thread rjrjr
Ready for review. I apologize for the size of this patch, but very little of it makes sense in isolation. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449817/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Adds hooks to Widget reduce MVP boilerplate and enshrines the app-wide EventBus. (issue1449817)

2011-06-13 Thread rjrjr
Reviewers: jlabanca, rchandia, rice, jaimeyap, Description: Adds hooks to Widget reduce MVP boilerplate and enshrines the app-wide EventBus. Also simplifies the custom event set used in the sample app, demonstrating how a single custom ActionEvent could cover most cases. And backs away from the s

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix enum switch construction in GwtAstBuilder (issue1450815)

2011-06-13 Thread jbrosenberg
lgtm http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450815/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Crude AST versioning. (issue1450816)

2011-06-13 Thread scottb
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450816/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450816/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCa

[gwt-contrib] Re: Crude AST versioning. (issue1450816)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450816/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450816/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCa

[gwt-contrib] Crude AST versioning. (issue1450816)

2011-06-13 Thread scottb
Reviewers: zundel, http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450816/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/PersistentUnitCache.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450816/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/ja

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10329 committed - Allow binary-only references for compile-time constants....

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10329 Author: sco...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 13 13:06:50 2011 Log: Allow binary-only references for compile-time constants. Like we do for binary-only annotations, this change allows binary-only references for compile-time constants. We don't actually need source in the

[gwt-contrib] Re: Allow binary-only references for compile-time constants. (issue1447825)

2011-06-13 Thread Eric Ayers
LGTM On Jun 13, 2011 6:04 PM, wrote: > > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447825/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryTypeReferenceRestrictionsChecker.java > File > dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryTypeReferenceRestrictionsChecker.java > (right): > > http://gwt-code-re

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10328 committed - Fix enum switch construction in GwtAstBuilder....

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10328 Author: sco...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 13 12:05:05 2011 Log: Fix enum switch construction in GwtAstBuilder. The existing code breaks on switch(Integer), it tries to tack an ordinal() call on the end of the unbox. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450815/ Review

[gwt-contrib] Re: Allow binary-only references for compile-time constants. (issue1447825)

2011-06-13 Thread scottb
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447825/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryTypeReferenceRestrictionsChecker.java File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryTypeReferenceRestrictionsChecker.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447825/diff/1/dev/core/src/com

[gwt-contrib] Re: Updated rpc generator result caching for field serializers to use type signature instead of last... (issue1446818)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1446818/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Allow binary-only references for compile-time constants. (issue1447825)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447825/diff/1/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryTypeReferenceRestrictionsChecker.java File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/BinaryTypeReferenceRestrictionsChecker.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447825/diff/1/dev/core/src/com

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix enum switch construction in GwtAstBuilder (issue1450815)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
lgtm http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450815/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Make Request.with() additive when used with different root objects. (issue1453813)

2011-06-13 Thread bobv
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453813/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/Resolver.java File user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/Resolver.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453813/diff/1/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfacto

[gwt-contrib] Fix enum switch construction in GwtAstBuilder (issue1450815)

2011-06-13 Thread scottb
Reviewers: zundel, jbrosenberg, Description: The existing code breaks on switch(Integer), it tries to tack an ordinal() call on the end of the unbox. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1450815/ Affected files: M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/GwtAstBuilder.jav

[gwt-contrib] Re: Make Request.with() additive when used with different root objects. (issue1453813)

2011-06-13 Thread t . broyer
I didn't look thoroughly at the changes but I like the overall changes (wait 'til all invocations are processed to resolve properties + splitting property resolving and client peer construction), and as long as the tests are green… ;-) http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453813/diff/1/user/src/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix handling of unlabeled break and continue in gflow. (issue1447824)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
On 2011/06/13 18:33:24, zundel wrote: chages vs. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453809/ include just a few unit tests. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447824/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Make Request.with() additive when used with different root objects. (issue1453813)

2011-06-13 Thread bobv
Reviewers: rjrjr, tbroyer, Message: Review requested. The path-processing code and creating client peers for domain objects are really orthogonal concerns, so I've split that code up. With this approach, re-resolving the properties on a proxy is no longer a special case. I re-used the tests fr

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10327 committed - Add JSO inspection support....

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10327 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Mon Jun 13 12:47:05 2011 Log: Add JSO inspection support. IDEs can use this class to implement JSO inspection capabilities in their debug view. Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1454807 http://code.google.com/p/goog

[gwt-contrib] Allow binary-only references for compile-time constants. (issue1447825)

2011-06-13 Thread scottb
Reviewers: zundel, Description: Like we do for binary-only annotations, this change allows binary-only references for compile-time constants. We don't actually need source in the GWT compiler, JDT embeds the constant value in the unit we do compile. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews

[gwt-contrib] Re: This patch substantially reduces the overhead of Java types in the output by minimizing vtable s... (issue1447821)

2011-06-13 Thread jbrosenberg
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447821/diff/3001/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentExtractor.java File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/FragmentExtractor.java (right): http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447821/diff/3001/dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/jjs/impl/Fragm

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix handling of unlabeled break and continue in gflow. (issue1447824)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447824/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Fix handling of unlabeled break and continue in gflow. (issue1447824)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447824/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Fix handling of unlabeled break and continue in gflow. (issue1447824)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
Reviewers: jbrosenberg, Description: Fix handling of unlabeled break and continue in gflow. This fixes issues: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6272 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6429 (was issue 1453809) Please review this at http:/

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10326 committed - Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache....

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10326 Author: zun...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 13 07:52:03 2011 Log: Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache. In this case, no data is lost, its just a normal cleanup job. Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447823 Review by: fabb...

[gwt-contrib] Re: Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache. (issue1447823)

2011-06-13 Thread jbrosenberg
LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447823/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re: Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache. (issue1447823)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447823/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10325 committed - Add more TCK tests...

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10325 Author: ncha...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 13 07:06:54 2011 Log: Add more TCK tests [JSR 303 TCK Result] 125 of 257 (48.64%) Pass with 8 Failures and 9 Errors. Review at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1451817 Review by: rchan...@google.com http://code.google.com/p/

[gwt-contrib] Re: Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache. (issue1447823)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447823/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache. (issue1447823)

2011-06-13 Thread zundel
Reviewers: fabbott, Description: Decreased the log level on a message relating to "purging" the cache. In this case, no data is lost, its just a normal cleanup job. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1447823/ Affected files: M dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/Pers

[gwt-contrib] Re: Rewrite SafeUriHostedModeUtils#isValid without regexp (issue1449814)

2011-06-13 Thread jlabanca
Committed as r10324 http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449814/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10324 committed - Rewrite SafeUriHostedModeUtils#isValid without regexp to workaround wh...

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10324 Author: jlaba...@google.com Date: Mon Jun 13 05:36:35 2011 Log: Rewrite SafeUriHostedModeUtils#isValid without regexp to workaround what looks like a bug in the Sun/Oracle JVM (error not reproduced with OpenJDK). http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1449814/ Author:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Re-roll issue 1442804: SafeHtmlRenderer code gen for UiBinder (issue1453812)

2011-06-13 Thread rchandia
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453812/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] Re-roll issue 1442804: SafeHtmlRenderer code gen for UiBinder (issue1453812)

2011-06-13 Thread rchandia
Reviewers: rjrjr, Description: Re-roll issue 1442804: SafeHtmlRenderer code gen for UiBinder Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1453812/ Affected files: A user/src/com/google/gwt/text/shared/UiRenderer.java M user/src/com/google/gwt/uibinder/UiBinder.gwt.xml M user

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add more TCK tests (issue1451817)

2011-06-13 Thread rchandia
On 2011/06/12 04:50:18, Nick Chalko wrote: LGTM http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1451817/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

[gwt-contrib] [google-web-toolkit] r10323 committed - Adds setTagName to PotentialElement, so that PotentialElement instance...

2011-06-13 Thread codesite-noreply
Revision: 10323 Author: gwt.mirror...@gmail.com Date: Mon Jun 13 03:14:47 2011 Log: Adds setTagName to PotentialElement, so that PotentialElement instances can be passed to the as() method of Element subclasses (it's nicer than blindly calling .cast(), I think). Let me know if this