Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Issue 7834 - fix BigDecimal compareTo
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
SGTM (not sure I understood all the changes though; someone else please
have an in-depth
According to
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7919 it
worked the way you describe in GWT 2.4 so let's go ahead and fix this.
Apparently the regression was introduced in
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=11174
Daniel: how's 2.5.1 going? is it
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Proxy IDs have to be the same for a given proxy in the
response payload.
..
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
I don't completely grok this, but the tests and
Matthew Dempsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: fixes ISSUE 7752 added constructor for
java.util.logging.Level gwt emulation to be compatible with JRE
..
Patch Set 4:
What would happen even those fields
Stephen,
I came up with the same idea. We are working on a rather large GWT
project, and the speed of dev mode is atrocious (30-45 second refresh on an
i7 with 32GB ram). I understand why GWT compiles the way it does for
production mode, but it seems it seems incredibly inefficient to have
Matthew Dempsky has abandoned this change.
Change subject: Inline javascript:'' within NamedFrame's internal
SafeHtmlTemplate
..
Abandoned
Submitted, thanks!
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1800
To
On 2013/01/12 15:35:19, tbroyer wrote:
We're in dev-time code so we can use Guava (the re-packaged one) and
it's
Objects.equal(a, b) which takes care of nulls.
I don't think that's true. This code still needs to be translatable to
JavaScript to support running tests in production mode, and
On 2013/01/28 21:06:02, mdempsky wrote:
On 2013/01/12 15:35:19, tbroyer wrote:
We're in dev-time code so we can use Guava (the re-packaged one) and
it's
Objects.equal(a, b) which takes care of nulls.
I don't think that's true. This code still needs to be translatable
to
JavaScript to
Hi,
I have the same problem using chrome 25.0.1364.45 beta and gwt 2.5.0.
Do we have to use the trunk of gwt for it to work?
On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:43:40 AM UTC+1, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
I've tried it recently with Chrome 25. You've checked the source maps on
checkbox and reloaded the
Hello,
The two code structure ensure that the javascript generated by GWT will be
properly splitted ?
GWT.runAsync(new RunAsyncCallback() {
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable reason) {
...
}
@Override
public void onSuccess() {
switch(value){
case 0: ... ;break;
case 1: ... ;break;
}
Thomas Broyer has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Proxy IDs have to be the same for a given proxy in the
response payload.
..
Patch Set 2:
The problem is that we have 2 ways of identifying an object: using
Hi Cédric,
I am not sure I understood your question, but in the first example case 0
and case 1 will be part of the same code fragment (will not be split),
whereas in the second example case 0 and case 1 code may be split.
Roberto Lublinerman | Software Engineer | rlu...@google.com |
Hello Andrew Bachmann,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1700
to look at the new patch set (#3).
Change subject: Updates ICU4J from 4.4.2 to 50.1.1
..
Updates ICU4J
Brian Slesinsky has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Issue 7834 - fix BigDecimal compareTo
..
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
Could you simplify this code? I don't see the bug either.
On Monday, January 28, 2013 9:54:29 AM UTC+1, Gaspard van Ko wrote:
Hi,
I have the same problem using chrome 25.0.1364.45 beta and gwt 2.5.0.
Do we have to use the trunk of gwt for it to work?
Yes.
--
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
---
You received
Andrew Bachmann has posted comments on this change.
Change subject: Updates ICU4J from 4.4.2 to 50.1.1
..
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/1700
To unsubscribe, visit
16 matches
Mail list logo
