[gwt-contrib] Re: Bad news for GWT DevMode!

2013-10-21 Thread Ivan Dimitrijevic
IMO Firefox On Friday, October 18, 2013 11:47:13 PM UTC+2, Alex Raugust wrote: Just curious, is there a preferred browser for Classic DevMode? What do the cool kids use? :) On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:05:59 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: Just saw this passing on Twitter:

[gwt-contrib] Re: Bad news for GWT DevMode!

2013-10-21 Thread Thomas Broyer
I don't think any committer to the GWT project uses Windows (other than for testing, using VMs then), so it'd be either Firefox or Chrome (no other choice on Linux; and on OSX, Safari is no longer supported started with 5.1, and I don't think anyone uses OmniWeb or similar). Both work well. To

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Bad news for GWT DevMode!

2013-10-21 Thread Colin Alworth
I end up debugging IE in dev mode on a regular basis as well, though in a VM, through to my host OS's Eclipse or IntelliJ debugger. It is significantly slower than running the IDE and browser on the same OS, but it does let you set up your env once and debug multiple OSes whenever you like. On

Re: [gwt-contrib] Gerrit presubmit changes

2013-10-21 Thread Roberto Lublinerman
Fantastic. On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Stephen Haberman step...@exigencecorp.comwrote: Wow, that sounds awesome, Matthew. Great work. I'm looking forward to hopefully *not* triggering this great feedback. :-) - Stephen --

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: packages com.google.gwt.thirdparty.*

2013-10-21 Thread Roberto Lublinerman
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: See $GWT_TOOLS/lib/eclipse/README.jdt-upgrade (last paragraph), and comments in https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/2361/1/dev/build.xml (if you understand them; reading them now, I don't ;-) ) In retrospective I am

Re: [gwt-contrib] being cute with git describe

2013-10-21 Thread Stephen Haberman
I was thinking about something like that too. I actually kinda like it, and it gives an easy monotonic counter for tracking master. Agreed. I don't think we're using proper git tags yet. The 'tags' currently in the tree for 2.5.1, etc that were imported from SVN are actually just regular

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: packages com.google.gwt.thirdparty.*

2013-10-21 Thread Cristiano Costantini
yes, it is :-( I got unresolved imports without it. I cannot say why exactly but I can find it if required. Curiously, the dependency of JDT from Jetty Orbit, which is the most close to the JDT jar available on GWT-Tools, include the contents of jdtCompilerAdapter.jar, but with the Jetty

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Bad news for GWT DevMode!

2013-10-21 Thread Alex Raugust
Safari is no longer supported started with 5.1... Say what now? On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think any committer to the GWT project uses Windows (other than for testing, using VMs then), so it'd be either Firefox or Chrome (no other choice

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Bad news for GWT DevMode!

2013-10-21 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Alex Raugust tinnitus...@gmail.com wrote: Safari is no longer supported started with 5.1... Say what now? The GWT Developer Mode plugin has never supported Safari 5.1. This is orthogonal to compiler/library support for Safari 5.1 in deployed applications

[gwt-contrib] Re: Reminder: GWT 2.6 feature complete is Nov 4

2013-10-21 Thread Colin Alworth
Patrick, looking at these, only two appear to have code reviews, and both are in the pre-git system. Gerrit, the current system, needs a CLA before it allows changes, to make sure that there are no copyright/licensing issues with contributions, and makes history/change management a little

[gwt-contrib] Re: Where is gwt-customchecks.jar?

2013-10-21 Thread Colin Alworth
Tentative patch up at https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/5063 - can someone sanity check it for me? It looks like step 4 (now step 3) should have previously been pointing to step 3 (now step 2), so is now more correct. On Sunday, October 20, 2013 2:12:17 PM UTC-5, Andrés Testi wrote: Thanks