I all,
I link you a post on ServiceMix dev mailing list where I am taking on
OSGi-fy GWT-Servlet and where I report my actual tests and my ideas:
http://servicemix.396122.n5.nabble.com/OSGIfy-server-jar-of-GWT-td5718247.html
Regards,
Cristiano
2013/11/4 Dann Martens
> Hi Thomas,
>
> You're
Since Google officially is dropping IE9 for their Apps services, does that
help move the needle to IE10+ for GWT 3.0?
http://googleappsupdates.blogspot.com/2013/11/end-of-support-for-internet-explorer-9.html
Sincerely,
Joseph
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-
Just moved to eclipse to verify a possible issue with the snapshot (nope,
bug was in my code), and eclipse seems to do okay with finding each
artifact in its own snapshot.
Can you ping the list when you push a new set of snapshots?
-Colin
On Nov 5, 2013 7:55 PM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
> Thank
This is another deprecation proposal; this time for com.google.gwt.widget.
It looks like this is a leftover from an effort to provide a new set of
widgets based on cells + appearance. Unfortunately it never took of and we
don't have any plans to pursue that path as part of the roadmap. However
rig
>
> Since Google officially is dropping IE9 for their Apps services, does that
> help move the needle to IE10+ for GWT 3.0?
>
>
>
> http://googleappsupdates.blogspot.com/2013/11/end-of-support-for-internet-explorer-9.html
>
The only reason supporting IE 9 is that Windows Vista is still supported
Hm, I just tried pushing another 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT, this time using your
patched scripts, but I got a Maven error:
/usr/bin/mvn org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy-file
-Dfile=./poms/gwt/pom.xml -Durl=
https://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/-DrepositoryId=son
PEBKAC; I tried deploying to the production repo without GPG signatures.
I've deployed again to the snapshot repo using your script, and it looks
better? FYI, I pushed this snapshot as "2.6-SNAPSHOT", based on reading
that Maven doesn't care about the difference.
Please give that a try, and then
Hm, actually I could use some guidance here from external people who might
be affected by this:
Should the release be "2.6-rc1", "2.6.0-rc1", "2.6.0-RC1", ...?
Should snapshots be pushed as "2.6-SNAPSHOT", "2.6.0-SNAPSHOT", both, ...?
It looks like Maven parses "2.6" and "2.6.0" identically for
My vote is 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT and 2.6.0-rc1, in case we need a bug fix
release... Being consistent with snapshot versions lets maven users update
to the new nightly without any config file changes.
On Nov 6, 2013 6:51 PM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
> Hm, actually I could use some guidance here from ext
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Colin Alworth wrote:
> My vote is 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT and 2.6.0-rc1, in case we need a bug fix
> release... Being consistent with snapshot versions lets maven users update
> to the new nightly without any config file changes.
>
SGTM; rebuilt as 2.6.0-rc1 and pushed to g
gwt-2.6.0-rc1.zip download:
https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/detail?name=gwt-2.6.0-rc1.zip
(Next up the Maven 2.6.0-rc1 artifacts.)
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Colin Alworth wrote:
>
>> My vote is 2.6.0-SNAPSHO
Can you clarify about 2.6.0-rc1? Are we pushing the current build as
2.6.0-rc1 to maven central? I don't yet see 2.6.0-rc1 in central, nor in
the google-snapshots.
A key detail about maven is that once a release is pushed with a particular
version, it can't be unpushed, released is released. Snaps
Email is almost fast enough to avoid this confusion - disregard my
questions, looks like I've already got my answer!
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> gwt-2.6.0-rc1.zip download:
> https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/detail?name=gwt-2.6.0-rc1.zip
>
> (N
Yep, to clarify: I've created a gwt-2.6.0-rc1 tag and pushed it to gerrit,
and also created a gwt-2.6.0-rc1.zip that I've uploaded to Google Code.
This is the same release that I already pushed to the google-snapshots
repo as 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT, and I'll soon push it to Maven Central as 2.6.0-rc1.
Th
Okay, 2.6.0-rc1 is available here now:
https://oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/google/com/google/gwt/gwt/
I think in a few hours it should sync to Maven Central?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Yep, to clarify: I've created a gwt-2.6.0-rc1 tag and pushed it to gerrit,
15 matches
Mail list logo
