Thanks. definitely wouldn't hold up 2.8 for it. Are you planning on doing
any more compiler enhancements after 2.8 or is it all hands on deck for
J2CL?
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 10:06:34 PM UTC-4, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> A quick fix would be, in a linker, to substitute "new $wnd.Object"
> with
If you need to disable cast checking, you are definitely doing something
wrong; you should fix underlying problem instead of disabling checks.
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Paul Stockley wrote:
> I am trying to create a native JsType to represent a javascript Array. Up
> to this point I have b
A powerful mocking tool. like PowerMock, will let you mock native JsType if
you prefer pure JRE unit tests.
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 5:46:26 PM UTC+2, Jens wrote:
>>
>> Depending on what exactly you want to test I would try hard using p
I was looking more to do some basic sanity tests of JsInterop interfaces
against actual Javascript libraries (to detect changes in API etc). I
hadn't looked at GWTTestCase for a while but remembered it ran DevMode.
Looks like I will be able to use webMode.
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 at 12:55:24 PM
It wasn't to get around underlying cast problems, just more for code size
and speed improvements. I guess the behavior was kind of unexpected in
SDM. Ideally using jre.checks.checkLevel mininal should work in SDM or at
the very least give an error stating it is incompatible.
On Monday, May
Oh sorry. I totally misread. So you are saying if you DON'T set
'jre.checks.checkLevel" to MINIMaL everything works fine? That's very
surprising. You should reproduce the the issue and file a bug.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Paul Stockley wrote:
> It wasn't to get around underlying cast pro
Actually the problem is when you set it to MINIMAL you get an undefined
error in SDM. I will see if I can get a small reproducible case and file a
bug.
On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 4:56:02 PM UTC-4, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
> Oh sorry. I totally misread. So you are saying if you DON'T set
> 'jre.
A few issues have come up (both in my own projects and in the issue
tracker) where it seemed that continuing to maintain and update the GWT
Generator and Linker types may be necessary. At least one was fairly
low-hanging fruit (up for review
at https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14750/), b
Is there a newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 that should be used with
GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT? I want to try out the latest snapshots to keep abreast
of the current status-quo, but I'm getting red highlights on JRE Emulation
in IntelliJ that I don't get if I use GWT 2.8.0-beta1 with the plugin
