Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Experimental release of Elemental2

2016-07-22 Thread Steve Andrews
I've now got this to work. I cleaned my SDM cache :-) It only works with the generateJsInteropExports flag set though. On Thursday, 21 July 2016 15:34:19 UTC+1, Steve Andrews wrote: > > I've been trying out the new Elemental and have been having trouble with > EventListener. I'm on the latest

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Experimental release of Elemental2

2016-07-22 Thread Jakob Jarosch
I made similar experiences, in GWT 2.8 the SDM cache is sometimes corrupt and even a restart of SDM won't bring it back alive. Only solution I found was cleaning temporary files. In GWT 2.7 there was sometimes the need to restart SDM, but never the need to clean the temporary files. On Friday,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Experimental release of Elemental2

2016-07-22 Thread Jens
> It only works with the generateJsInteropExports flag set though. > Sounds like a bug to me. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to googl

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT fails to compile

2016-07-22 Thread Sri Harsha Chilakapati
I have been using GWT 2.8.0 Beta 1 till now, and my application is being compiled successfully. But with the snapshot I'm getting a error. It is here. ~~~Java Jul 22, 2016 1:42:21 PM java.util.prefs.WindowsPreferences WARNING: Could not open/create prefs root node Software\JavaSoft\Prefs at ro

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT fails to compile

2016-07-22 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 3:02:04 PM UTC+2, Sri Harsha Chilakapati wrote: > > I have been using GWT 2.8.0 Beta 1 till now, and my application is being > compiled successfully. But with the snapshot I'm getting a error. It is > here. > > ~~~Java > Jul 22, 2016 1:42:21 PM java.util.prefs.Window

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT fails to compile

2016-07-22 Thread Sri Harsha Chilakapati
Yes obviously, I forgot, I just updated the version in the gwt config block, but still compiling with gwt-user and gwt-dev of beta 1. Thanks! On Friday, 22 July 2016 18:38:16 UTC+5:30, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 3:02:04 PM UTC+2, Sri Harsha Chilakapati wrote: >> >> I

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT fails to compile

2016-07-22 Thread Kirill Prazdnikov
> > > If you see Emulation inheriting Internal, then it means you still have, > somehow, gwt-user 2.8.0-beta1 in your classpath, along with gwt-dev > 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT; > Hi Thomas, I compile my app with 2.8-SNAPSHOT (by maven), and I don`t have beta1 anywhere mentioned in my configuration. Ho

[gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT fails to compile

2016-07-22 Thread Thomas Broyer
On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 4:51:13 PM UTC+2, Kirill Prazdnikov wrote: > > >> If you see Emulation inheriting Internal, then it means you still have, >> somehow, gwt-user 2.8.0-beta1 in your classpath, along with gwt-dev >> 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT; >> > > > Hi Thomas, > > I compile my app with 2.8-SNAP

[gwt-contrib] Change to SerializbleTypeOracleBuilder constructor removing an argument

2016-07-22 Thread Kay Pac
In change 580db4248fc38f9721d0a920cabfc2b17e10d73f (http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1113801/show), the constructor for SerializableTypeOracleBuilder was changed. from: public SerializableTypeOracleBuilder(TreeLogger logger, PropertyOracle propertyOracle, GeneratorContext context) throws U

[gwt-contrib] Re: Change to SerializbleTypeOracleBuilder constructor removing an argument

2016-07-22 Thread Kay Pac
Sorry, the change is at https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/8041/ On Friday, July 22, 2016 at 4:13:38 PM UTC-7, Kay Pac wrote: > > In change 580db4248fc38f9721d0a920cabfc2b17e10d73f ( > http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1113801/show), the constructor for > SerializableTypeOracleBuilder was

[gwt-contrib] Re: Newer gwt-maven-plugin than 2.8.0-beta1 ?

2016-07-22 Thread Kay Pac
Oh sweet I didn't know there was a different maven GWT plugin. I mean Maven Plugin for GWT. ;-) It will take me a bit to process this radical life change, but I hope to get some hands on experience with it soon. Thanks so much Thomas!! On Tuesday, May 3, 2016 at 8:46:02 AM UTC-7, David Becker w