Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

2014-10-30 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
Release notes are here: http://www.gwtproject.org/release-notes.html#Release_Notes_2_7_0_RC1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Blocking RC1: Fold gwt-codeserver into gwt-dev

2014-10-29 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
It looks like the gwt-codeserver jar will still exist, but the same classes will also be in gwt-dev.jar. So it's ugly but should be backward compatible? - Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [gwt-contrib] Blocking RC1: Fold gwt-codeserver into gwt-dev

2014-10-28 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
Yes, merging the jars should be fine as a short-term fix. Codeserver should be built as a separate library to enforce that there are no circular dependencies. (We already have one for DevMode -superDevMode but that should be fixed by splitting out DevMode; it doesn't belong in the same library as

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 release plan

2014-10-09 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
I think this is okay as long as it doesn't cause tests to fail. Elemental is quite separate from everything else so it seems low risk. Daniel? On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Leif Åstrand legi...@gmail.com wrote: Lots of Elemental patches have been merged in the last few days, but we do still

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 release plan

2014-10-01 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
- Make sure sample apps work with DevMode -superdevmode - I think we're waiting on a patch to CLDR 25 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: Hi all, we just settled on a GWT 2.7 release plan: - We *code

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 release plan

2014-10-01 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
It's experimental and hidden behind a flag, but it's there. On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Cristian Rinaldi csrina...@gmail.com wrote: - JsInterop Preview is part of the release? El miércoles, 1 de octubre de 2014 16:15:26 UTC-3, Daniel Kurka escribió: Hi all, we just settled on a GWT

Re: [gwt-contrib] Trying SDM with Java 1.6 Issue gotcha

2014-09-30 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
Oops. This particular bug shouldn't be hard to fix. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote: Just a thought, the folks that forget to update Java 1.6 to Java 1.7 in their project and run SDM (super dev mode) will have issues. A warning could be

Re: [gwt-contrib] Trying SDM with Java 1.6 Issue gotcha

2014-09-30 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
Actually, that particular stack trace should be fixed by this uncommitted patch: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9361/ However, I haven't tested it on Java 1.6. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Brian Slesinsky skybr...@google.com wrote: Oops. This particular bug shouldn't be hard to

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: SDM -XcompilePerFile: initial feedback

2014-09-09 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
This sounds like it might be a deadlock. Could you jstack to get a thread dump of the running process? It should tell us where it's stuck. On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: recentish ones are: 267ad5efd00aae9b0f69eca793891e9fdad28e45 Opts compilePerFile

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: SDM -XcompilePerFile: initial feedback

2014-09-08 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: And a last question just popped up again: Is there any way to force embedded Jetty of CodeServer to not print out request logs at DEBUG level? Kind of annoying when all these progress requests show up between GWT logs.

Re: [gwt-contrib] JsInterop Advance

2014-08-21 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
I'm eager to start using Java 8 too, but I think we should wait until we have Java 8 committed (behind a flag) before having the discussion about whether to require it for anything. As we've found with incremental compile, sometimes we end up changing direction a bit to reach our goal, so there's

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Dropping IE8 support in useragent-less GWT

2014-07-17 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
It would make sense in principle but we don't know anyone who wants to target older browsers without also using permutations. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Jens jens.nehlme...@gmail.com wrote: I believe Google builds applications that use Elemental and/or JsInterop, so they don't use

Re: [gwt-contrib] JettyLauncher class loader

2014-07-01 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
I don't understand the details enough to make an informed recommendation, but I think introducing a new entry point is a good time to transition to the standard way (assuming it is standard). We could add the backward-compatibility flag if needed after some testing to see what the breakage would

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWTproject site menu

2014-05-08 Thread 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors
If you click Tutorial and then Documentation the animation is a bit unfortunate. Because the previous menu closes at the same time that the new one opens, the new menu expands both up and down so that your cursor ends up pointing to the middle of the new menu, and then you have to wait until it