It is true that GIN is kind of unmaintained. There has been some internal
patches but nobody bothered moving the project out of Google code and
export those due to initial overhead.
Bu regardless, right now GIN uses reflection with a ClassLoader hack to
access types. And at least some code
That's fair. I wasn't expecting much need either but just wanted a simpler
way out if it ended up being important for the community.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino
wrote:
> I follow, but I have a couple of thoughts
>
> - Is it actually useful from
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 6:29:22 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
>
>
> Isn't GIN unmaintained anyway?
>>
> (and what we're all waiting for is proper GWT support in Dagger 2 ;-) )
>>
>
> I don't know. GIN works well and a ton of apps use it.
>
Well, at least it's not actively developed: with
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 9:13:43 PM UTC+1, Goktug Gokdogan wrote:
>
> I think you didn't understand what I said. Let me try to clarify:
>
> "For any reason, if community wants to run the GWT 2.8 SDK in Java 7
> source level *(i.e. gwtc sourcelevel 7)*, they can theoretically do it by
> Isn't GIN unmaintained anyway?
>
(and what we're all waiting for is proper GWT support in Dagger 2 ;-) )
>
I don't know. GIN works well and a ton of apps use it. A lot of these apps
will probably not migrate to Dagger 2 anytime soon (especially not if it
takes ages for a PR to be
Isn't GIN unmaintained anyway?
(and what we're all waiting for is proper GWT support in Dagger 2 ;-) )
On Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 1:20:34 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
>
> Seems like GWT apps that use GIN will still require Java 8. I just tried
> latest master from today using Guava 20-SNAPSHOT,
Agree, there are some corner cases, but normally gwt developers have to
deal with a bunch of differences between java and gwt.
Anyway I think that it's better that SDK7 users assume some language issues
than not be able to compile their projects at all.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:17 AM, 'Daniel
We have seen issues internally where some code would be a compile error in
Java8 but not in Java7 (especially around type checking). This setup will
leave users vulnerable to this since their code will compile in their IDE,
but will fail GWT compile.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:57 AM Manuel
I follow, but I have a couple of thoughts
- Is it actually useful from the user perspective to use a sourceLevel=1.7
if he has to manually provide a compatible gwt-jre-emulation?
IMO, he might want that everything works out-of-the-boxy. Right now, gwt
emul classes in the 2.8-snapshot make fail
I think you didn't understand what I said. Let me try to clarify:
"For any reason, if community wants to run the GWT 2.8 SDK in Java 7 source
level *(i.e. gwtc sourcelevel 7)*, they can theoretically do it by
supplying *a java7 compatible JRE emulation* without any compiler/SDK
changes *(but just
Removing the 1.7 flag does not make the compiler fail when using a java7
sdk.
Now the compiler always thinks that source code is sourced-level 1.8 so it
does not fail when looking at java8 emul classes.
You can still have the java.source property set to 1.7 when compiling your
project and javac
To remind the backlog of this:
GWT 2.8 decided to support only Java8 source level (see related threads
from last year) as the emulation will include Java 8 APIs which cannot be
compiled in Java7 mode.
However, GWT compiler itself is intended to be runnable in a Java 7 JVM.
This should enable
On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 11:39:02 AM UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 10:06:47 AM UTC+1, Manuel Carrasco Moñino
> wrote:
>>
>> Thomas, I want to experiment with this, pls, could you give me some
>> advise what are the classes I have to look at?
>>
>
>
On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 10:06:47 AM UTC+1, Manuel Carrasco Moñino
wrote:
>
> Thomas, I want to experiment with this, pls, could you give me some advise
> what are the classes I have to look at?
>
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/14353
(currently running the testsuite locally)
>
Thomas, I want to experiment with this, pls, could you give me some advise
what are the classes I have to look at?
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> Just to make it clearer, my suggestion is:
>
> * force sourceLevel to 8 (either make the argument a
Just to make it clearer, my suggestion is:
* force sourceLevel to 8 (either make the argument a no-op –using 8 even
if arg says 7–, or fail on "-sourceLevel 7")
* build GWT with JDK 7; particularly the release artifacts (snapshots
matter less). Note that this means changing the CI builds to
Hi all, in the behave of gwt-maintainers, I'm forwarding this discussion
started in the maintainer list to the contributors one. Feel free to
contribute with your opinions.
Basically the matter is about the convenience of not breaking java7
compatibility in 2.8
Thanks
-Manolo
On Fri, Feb 12,
I would choose Java 1.8 all the way if you have to choose. I would do this
because this is going to be a long standing maintenance release. Just a
note, the Eclipse neon out in June will require Java 1.8. I think it makes
sense to upgrade. I think folks can go through the pain of upgrading
Switching to gwt-contrib, we're losing voices who are involved in this
discussion.
Maybe I am missing something, but I had that that the discussion moved
toward the fact that the compiler and dev mode will require Java8, but that
gwt-servlet could still be compiled to Java7, allowing deployment
19 matches
Mail list logo