[gwt-contrib] Re: SOYC generates more dependency trees

2009-07-06 Thread kprobst
On 2009/07/01 17:56:26, Lex wrote: Generally, LGTM. I had a few comments below. Going forward, I notice that SOYC + the dashboard are growing in complexity and functionality - there is nothing wrong with that, and it's definitely a good step forward. However, would it make sense to write up

[gwt-contrib] Re: SOYC generates more dependency trees

2009-07-06 Thread Bruce Johnson
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:11 AM, kpro...@google.com wrote: I see two options: a) a full-blown query language (far off, but would be very cool), or b) a UI driven by use cases and/or specific questions, which we spell out explicitly for the user, either in the UI itself or else in an

[gwt-contrib] Re: SOYC generates more dependency trees

2009-07-06 Thread Lex Spoon
I fully agree about the development pattern! That's why I started by writing the CodeSplitting wiki page as if SOYC already supported the use cases I was thinking about. The design doc was therefore a user manual. As an aside, the code splitting document might sound like a weird home for SOYC

[gwt-contrib] Re: SOYC generates more dependency trees

2009-07-06 Thread spoon
Committed at r5676. http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/50806 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---