On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
> Thomas, thanks for all of the work on this, but we will have to delay
> this until after we get the open-source git/gerrit repo up and
> running.
No problem (no, really!)
Someone had to do it and I was in the mood for it; and the patch
shoul
In ordinary cases where there is no API change, I don't think the
problem is so severe. But removing APIs, even deprecated ones, is
always hard, just look at the Web and the debates over vendor
prefixes. At Google we do have tools that help with 'company wide
refactoring', the EventListener issue
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Stephen Haberman
wrote:
>
> > give internal teams a lead time to fix their usages first
>
> Haven't these been deprecated since ~2008? How much more lead time is
> necessary? Is there a "@NoSeriouslyWeReallyMeanItDeprecated" annotation
> we should use instead?
>
Ac
> give internal teams a lead time to fix their usages first
Haven't these been deprecated since ~2008? How much more lead time is
necessary? Is there a "@NoSeriouslyWeReallyMeanItDeprecated" annotation
we should use instead?
Even with the new process, if google-vendor is going to diverge from
tr
Thomas, thanks for all of the work on this, but we will have to delay
this until after we get the open-source git/gerrit repo up and
running. A preliminary investigation of internal Google apps shows a
bunch of them still relying on EventListener, so we'll have to create
an uber-patch to fix all of
Awesome work, Thomas!
- Stephen
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Reviewers: cromwellian, rdayal,
Description:
Remove long-deprecated event listeners and EventPreview.
Please review this at https://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1822803/
Affected files:
M
reference/code-museum/src/com/google/gwt/museum/client/common/EventReporter.java
D
reference/code-
