Re: [gpc-informatics] #155: Define Encounter type terms and Epic ETL

2014-11-12 Thread GPC Informatics
#155: Define Encounter type terms and Epic ETL --+ Reporter: lv| Owner: huhickman Type: design-issue | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains3 Component: data-stds |

RE: UMN - updated ontology for babel

2014-11-12 Thread Dan Connolly
Nice! The norm for sharing the CSV file is via PCORNet CDT; see #76https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/76 for details. Then re-assign #172 to Nathan or myself to update babel. -- Dan From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu

Re: [gpc-informatics] #178: determine whether last.visit is the last fulfilled visit or the last scheduled visit

2014-11-12 Thread GPC Informatics
#178: determine whether last.visit is the last fulfilled visit or the last scheduled visit ---+ Reporter: mish | Owner: jhe Type: problem| Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: data-quality2 Component:

Diagnosis Modifiers on Babel

2014-11-12 Thread Phillip Reeder
The current terminology has the following for billing diagnosis modifiers: Admit Billing Diagnosis Principal Discharge Diagnosis Diagnosis Present on Admission Secondary Billing Diagnosis Based on some emails around the time of the modifiers were added, I think the terminology should be: Admit

RE: Diagnosis Modifiers on Babel

2014-11-12 Thread Dan Connolly
The details are (supposed to be) in #90https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/90 and #91https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/91. We approved Jim's March 4 proposal, but what's on babel doesn't look like this at all... PROPOSED

Re: Diagnosis Modifiers on Babel

2014-11-12 Thread Bonnie Westra
One questions is the source of the data It is from the problem list or from billing data In our research we were just going through this as we don't want a limited number of diagnoses that get on a bill so we can understand the cluster of problems patients have that could influence outcomes such

RE: [gpc-informatics] #90: Diagnoses Modifiers for data attribution

2014-11-12 Thread Dan Connolly
This looks OK to me, but I'm not really one to judge. I'd like to get a few more opinions. To avoid the anoybody/somebody/nobody disease, I rolled my 10 sided die and it came up 6... MCRF. Laurel, what do you folks think? Are you happy to deploy this at your site? If not, what would you

Re: [gpc-informatics] #90: Diagnoses Modifiers for data attribution

2014-11-12 Thread GPC Informatics
#90: Diagnoses Modifiers for data attribution --+ Reporter: campbell | Owner: lv Type: design-issue | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains2 Component: data-stds | Resolution: