This looks OK to me, but I'm not really one to judge. I'd like to get a few more opinions.
To avoid the anoybody/somebody/nobody disease, I rolled my 10 sided die and it came up 6... MCRF. Laurel, what do you folks think? Are you happy to deploy this at your site? If not, what would you prefer? -- Dan ________________________________________ From: Phillip Reeder [phillip.ree...@utsouthwestern.edu] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:13 PM To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; campb...@unmc.edu; Dan Connolly Cc: gpc-...@listserv.kuc.edu Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #90: Diagnoses Modifiers for data attribution Based on the emails I found, and what is on babel, this is what I think the modifiers should be. The only difference from Babel is in the Billing Diagnosis modifiers where I tried apply what was in the various emails. Cerner had Inactive and Canceled modifiers for the Problem List Diagnosis in one of the emails. I¹m unsure if they need to be added or if they could be mapped to the three modifiers from Epic. For consistency, is there a preference for Principle vs Primary? Does it make a difference? Modifier Modifier Code Clarity Table Billing Diagnosis Admit Diagnosis Principle DX|BILL:ADMIT PRINCIPLE HSP_ACCT_ADMIT_DX Admit Diagnosis Secondary DX|BILL:ADMIT SECONDARY HSP_ACCT_ADMIT_DX Discharge Diagnosis Principle DX|BILL:PRINCIPAL HSP_ACCT_DX_LIST Discharge Diagnosis Secondary DX|BILL:SECONDARY HSP_ACCT_DX_LIST Discharge Diagnosis Present on Admis.. DX|BILL:POA HSP_ACCT_DX_LIST Encounter Diagnosis Admit Encounter Diagnosis DX|ENC:ADMIT HSP_ADMIT_DIAGNOSIS Discharge Encounter Diagnosis DX|ENC:DISCHARGE HSP_DISCH_DIAGNOSIS Primary Encounter Diagnosis DX|ENC:PRIMARY PAT_ENC_DX Secondary Encounter Diagnosis DX|ENC:SECONDARY PAT_ENC_DX Medical History Diagnosis DX:HISTORY MEDICAL_HX Order Diagnosis Order Medication Diagnosis DX|ORDER:MED ORDER_DX_MED Order Procedure Diagnosis DX|ORDER:PROC ORDER_DX_PROC Problem List Diagnosis Active Problem DX|PROB:ACTIVE PROBLEM_LIST Deleted Problem DX|PROB:DELETED PROBLEM_LIST Resolved Problem DX|PROB:RESOLVED PROBLEM_LIST Professional Diagnosis Primary Professional Diagnosis DX|PROF:PRIMARY ARPB_TRANSACTIONS Secondary Professional Diagnosis DX|PROF:SECONDARY ARPB_TRANSACTIONS On 11/12/14, 1:33 PM, "GPC Informatics" <d...@madmode.com> wrote: >#90: Diagnoses Modifiers for data attribution >--------------------------+---------------------------- > Reporter: campbell | Owner: preeder > Type: design-issue | Status: assigned > Priority: major | Milestone: data-domains2 >Component: data-stds | Resolution: > Keywords: | Blocked By: > Blocking: 70, 91, 120 | >--------------------------+---------------------------- >Changes (by dconnolly): > > * cc: gpc-dev@Š (added) > * owner: dconnolly => preeder > * status: reopened => assigned > > >Comment: > > Phillip, I re-opene this because your question (Wednesday, November 12, > 2014 12:44 PM) shows we clearly didn't carry out the recorded decision. > > Do you have a preference on what the modifiers actually should be? > >-- >Ticket URL: ><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/90#comment:7> >gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> >Greater Plains Network - Informatics ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev