RE: [gpc-informatics] #162: PopMedNet node at UIOWA

2015-10-28 Thread Nadkarni, Prakash
Yes, it can indeed be closed. PopMedNet has been operational at Iowa for at least 6 months. -Original Message- From: GPC Informatics [mailto:d...@madmode.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 3:53 PM To: verhagen.lau...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu; Nadkarni, Prakash; dconno...@kumc.edu; kwa...@uw

Re: [gpc-informatics] #162: PopMedNet node at UIOWA

2015-10-28 Thread GPC Informatics
#162: PopMedNet node at UIOWA --+-- Reporter: lv| Owner: prakashnadkarni Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: minor | Milestone: drn-query-1 Component: data-sharing | Resolution: Keywor

RE: CDM refresh

2015-10-28 Thread Klann, Jeffrey G.
Yes, email is still the state-of-the art. I've added exploring GitHub back to my todo list. We're focused on gearing up for a public release currently, which will go on the i2b2 wiki. Email me for a link to our development version. Update since the 9/22 notes - we have a CDMv3 transform for MSSQ

Re: RXNORM with RXCUIs

2015-10-28 Thread Phillip Reeder
I put my internal medid concept as the leaf under the rxcui folder, then hide any empty folders. That allows me to use the same data with several different mapping, including being able to maintain the original hierarchy we pulled from epic, or potentially other hierarchies. It's the same way K

RXNORM with RXCUIs

2015-10-28 Thread Deborah Yoshihara
Phillip, I noticed in both your and KUMC's ontology with RXNORM, there are no leaf nodes, or should I say, what I think of as leaf nodes are labled FA - so Folders. Once you get down to the MED_ID in KUMC's case, and the RXCUI in UTSW's case, why do you still have it as a Folder instead of a