Re: [gpc-informatics] #280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient

2017-10-03 Thread GPC Informatics
#280: Medication ontology orgainzed by ingredient -+ Reporter: preeder | Owner: campbell Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: snow-shrine-2 Component: data-stds|

Re: SNOW Shrine Ontology

2017-10-03 Thread Phillip Reeder
UTSW is currently making DB changes. Once it comes back, we'll start returning results again. Phillip From: Gpc-dev > on behalf of Dan Connolly > Date: Tuesday, October

RE: SNOW Shrine Ontology

2017-10-03 Thread Dan Connolly
Yay! Indeed, a simple demographics test gets counts from UMN as well as UTHSCSA, MCW, KUMC, and MCRF (but not UTSW? odd...). As to your question: If I understand correctly, SHRINE adapter mappings are not optional. At a minimum, it's a big CSV file with all the terms repeated in both the 1st

Re: SNOW Shrine Ontology

2017-10-03 Thread Andrew Hangsleben
Thanks Dan, we should be up and running at UMN now; I ran a few queries to verify we were returning results. Out of curiosity, is there any reason we aren't using the PCORnet ontology directly in shrine instead of the shrine ontology + adapter mappings? Regards, Andrew On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at

RE: SNOW Shrine Ontology

2017-10-03 Thread Dan Connolly
Yes, that's how it works. #411 should have details. -- Dan From: Gpc-dev [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] on behalf of Andrew Hangsleben [hangs...@umn.edu] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:43 AM

SNOW Shrine Ontology

2017-10-03 Thread Andrew Hangsleben
Hi Everyone, We are working on getting our ontology and mappings configured here at UMN. I was hoping someone could help me understand which ontologies we are using for the SNOW network. My current understanding is that sites are using the PCORnet/SCIHLS locally, but we are using the shrine

RE: GPC SNOW SHRINE status at LEC - 2 Weeks: gold: UTSW, KUMC; silver: MCRF; bronze: WISC, UNMC

2017-10-03 Thread Wanta Keith M
I would guess that the i2b2 server does not need to initate requests to the SHRINE server. To confirm this, try setting up an iptables rule on the SHRINE server to block the incoming TCP traffic on port 6443. If things are working, then the SHRINE server is only considered the client (sends

Re: GPC SNOW SHRINE status at LEC - 2 Weeks: gold: UTSW, KUMC; silver: MCRF; bronze: WISC, UNMC

2017-10-03 Thread French, Tony
I am actively working (over weekend, yesterday and today) on the Indiana node and hope to have the issues resolved ASAP. I just sent a question to the SHRINE listserve but perhaps someone here knows the answer: When running i2b2 and SHRINE on separate application servers, does the I2B2 server