t;>
>> Jeff, in our gpc-dev call last Tuesday, you took the ball to make sure a
>> meeting gets set up. What news?
>>
>> --
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [jeff.kl...@mgh.harvard.edu]
>> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2
>From: Klann, Jeffrey G. [jeff.kl...@mgh.harvard.edu]
>Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 2:34 PM
>To: Dan Connolly; gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; campb...@unmc.edu
>Cc: Murphy, Shawn N.
>Subject: Re: #455: SCILHS CDM compliant with ONC standard coding?
>
>Co
...@unmc.edu
Cc: Murphy, Shawn N.
Subject: Re: #455: SCILHS CDM compliant with ONC standard coding?
Cool. Some initial reactions:
This intuitively feels very useful, but what¹s the intended use case? In
SCILHS, whatever c_basecodes we provide in the default ontology are mostly
overwritten by local
ent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 9:33 AM
>To: campb...@unmc.edu; Dan Connolly
>Cc: Nathan Graham
>Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #455: SCILHS CDM compliant with ONC
>standard coding?
>
>#455: SCILHS CDM compliant with ONC standard coding?
>--+
with ONC standard
coding?
#455: SCILHS CDM compliant with ONC standard coding?
--+
Reporter: campbell | Owner: campbell
Type: design-issue | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: data-domains3
Component
