Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS-PSC] Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8

2021-03-22 Thread Veronica Andreo
Hi everybody, Ok, so we can now vote the C/C++ RFC, and then open a new thread + RFC regarding support for python versions. I'll send the voting motion later today or tomorrow. Cheers, Vero El lun, 22 mar 2021 a las 11:18, Nicklas Larsson () escribió: > Forgot to add: Python support changes wi

[GRASS-dev] Failing addon releasebranch_7_8 (Python 3.6) pipeline

2021-03-22 Thread Markus Neteler
Hi devs, I regularly receive releasebranch_7_8 (Python 3.6) Process completed with exit code 1. (e.g., https://github.com/OSGeo/grass-addons/actions/runs/675694073) which is a bit confusing for me since we (I believe) already fixed the issues: Executing ... generate_manpage_images from ./vect

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS-PSC] Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8

2021-03-22 Thread Nicklas Larsson via grass-dev
Forgot to add: Python support changes with GRASS minor versions adds a bit of complication with add-ons, which are bound to major version. I don't know what would be the better solution for this. N. On Monday, 22 March 2021, 10:24:06 CET, Nicklas Larsson via grass-psc wrote: Hi,

Re: [GRASS-dev] [GRASS-PSC] Min. req. of programming language standard support, GRASS GIS 8

2021-03-22 Thread Nicklas Larsson via grass-dev
Hi, Although I didn't see the need to remove Python from RFC 7 (as it was originally formulated), there is also some logic to treat Python as a whole in a separate RFC. I don't have strong opinion on either way, therefore I lifted out Python from the draft, which now only deals with C and C++.