kapo coulibaly wrote:
How about sticking with shell?
Using the shell frequently results in scripts which don't work
reliably on Unix or at all on Windows. It's also a horrible language
for anything beyond the simplest tasks.
--
Glynn Clements gl...@gclements.plus.com
Anna Kratochvílová wrote:
PS - There is a similar problem with Python version (required 2.4).
Some interesting features start with 2.5 but usually we can live
without it. Any opinions?
I see no reason to support 2.4, and at least one reason to require at
least 2.5 (the with statement).
On 19/03/13 19:04, Michael Barton wrote:
I think that this is a good idea for GRASS 7. We shouldn't really do it
with GRASS 6.
+1
Moritz
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
By at least, do you mean looking at 2.6, 2.7 or 3.0 as well?
Doug
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.eduwrote:
I think that this is a good idea for GRASS 7. We shouldn't really do it
with GRASS 6.
I like going to at least Python 2.5 also.
Michael
Good question, maybe a roadmap ending (so far with Python 3 for Grass
8 (funny to mention this version number !)
On 20 March 2013 17:32, Newcomb, Doug doug_newc...@fws.gov wrote:
By at least, do you mean looking at 2.6, 2.7 or 3.0 as well?
Doug
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Michael Barton
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Newcomb, Doug doug_newc...@fws.gov wrote:
By at least, do you mean looking at 2.6, 2.7 or 3.0 as well?
+1 for python 2.6 that it is the default version in debian stable [0]...
Moreover, the Python 2.6 [1] added compatibility functions in a
future_builtins
Minimum wxPython version is changed in r55466 (I hope I haven't missed
any other places).
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Pietro peter.z...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Newcomb, Doug doug_newc...@fws.gov wrote:
By at least, do you mean looking at 2.6, 2.7 or 3.0 as well?
My understanding is that Python 3 is not backward compatible with Python 2.
Michael Barton
School of Human Evolution Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics Complexity
Arizona State University
...Sent from my iPad
On Mar 20, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Anna Kratochvílová kratocha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Michael Barton michael.bar...@asu.edu wrote:
My understanding is that Python 3 is not backward compatible with Python 2.
it is true, but we are not talking to require python3 instead of
python2, we are talking to require python2.6 instead of
You can always use shell. But this is a question about 1) the graphical
interface, and 2) python libraries for advanced commands and use in scripting.
Michael
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human
Hi Anna,
2013/3/19 Anna Kratochvílová kratocha...@gmail.com:
I would like to change minimal required version of wxPython [1].
Currently we support (theoretically) version 2.8.1.1 (released 2007).
I suggest to change it to 2.8.10.1 (2009), for example 2.8.10.1 was
shipped with Ubuntu 10.04
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:39:33PM +0100, Anna Kratochvílová wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to change minimal required version of wxPython [1].
Currently we support (theoretically) version 2.8.1.1 (released 2007).
I suggest to change it to 2.8.10.1 (2009), for example 2.8.10.1 was
shipped with
I think that this is a good idea for GRASS 7. We shouldn't really do it with
GRASS 6.
I like going to at least Python 2.5 also.
Michael
__
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics Complexity
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution Social
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:39:33PM +0100, Anna Kratochvílová wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to change minimal required version of wxPython [1].
Currently we support (theoretically) version 2.8.1.1 (released 2007).
I suggest
14 matches
Mail list logo
