Below is a recent exchange between Markus (Neteler) and me about the
new r.watershed.fast.
The gist is the question: is it ready to go into the develbranch_6 and
trunk (7) svn or does it need more testing. I thought it was already
in the main svn, but Markus pointed out that it is still in
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below is a recent exchange between Markus (Neteler) and me about the new
> r.watershed.fast.
> The gist is the question: is it ready to go into the develbranch_6 and trunk
> (7) svn or does it need more testing. I thought
Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Below is a recent exchange between Markus (Neteler) and me about the new
>> r.watershed.fast.
>> The gist is the question: is it ready to go into the develbranch_6 and trunk
>> (7) svn or do
Markus Metz wrote:
> assuming that GRASS runs today on systems where at least
> 500MB RAM are available
500MB total, 500MB per user, or 500MB per process?
It's safe to assume 500MB for the system (although much of GRASS can
run on a PDA, it's reasonable to assume that people won't be
performing
