[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-30 Thread GRASS GIS
#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree --+- Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: m

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-23 Thread GRASS GIS
#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree --+- Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: m

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-23 Thread GRASS GIS
#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree --+- Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: m

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-18 Thread Markus Neteler
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Hamish wrote: > > Markus: >> Patch attached (maybe there is a better way to write it): > >> Eigen values, (vectors), and [percent importance]: >> PC1 4712.17 (-0.2798,-0.3332,-0.5054,-0.0015,-0.5341,-0.5196) [ 84.0537% ] > > > just cosmetics, but please could

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-17 Thread Hamish
Markus: > Patch attached (maybe there is a better way to write it): > Eigen values, (vectors), and [percent importance]: > PC1 4712.17 (-0.2798,-0.3332,-0.5054,-0.0015,-0.5341,-0.5196) [ 84.0537% ] just cosmetics, but please could it look like: (G_message version) > PC1 4712.17 ( -0.2798

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-16 Thread Dylan Beaudette
On Monday 16 March 2009, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Hamish wrote: > > Nikos: > >>  Now that I look again at the results (meaning the tests I have sent in > >> the ML and in the wiki as well [1]) I think that your thought about > >> increasing the decimals printed in

Re: [GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-16 Thread Markus Neteler
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Hamish wrote: > > Nikos: >>  Now that I look again at the results (meaning the tests I have sent in >> the ML and in the wiki as well [1]) I think that your thought about >> increasing the decimals printed in i.pca's output is not a bad idea. >>  Perhaps adding on

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-16 Thread Hamish
Nikos: > Now that I look again at the results (meaning the tests I have sent in > the ML and in the wiki as well [1]) I think that your thought about > increasing the decimals printed in i.pca's output is not a bad idea. > Perhaps adding one more digit to make it look like I would like to incre

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-15 Thread GRASS GIS
#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree --+- Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: m

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-03-01 Thread GRASS GIS
#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree --+- Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: m

[GRASS-dev] Re: [GRASS GIS] #430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree

2009-01-13 Thread GRASS GIS
#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree --+- Reporter: nikos| Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: m