On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Pierre Roudier
pierre.roud...@gmail.com wrote:
Absolutely Markus. Let's also keep in mind that comparing segmentation
results is a very tricky exercise. There's no such thing as a perfect
segmentation result IMHO.
Here, since I was curious, a kind of comparison
Hi,
2013/2/11 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
I can make the results more similar, but one reason why results are
different between i.segment and i.segment.xl is that I had the
btw, the module located in trunk (`imagery/i.segment`) is compiled as
`i.segment.xl`. Probably it should
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Martin Landa landa.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
2013/2/11 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
I can make the results more similar, but one reason why results are
different between i.segment and i.segment.xl is that I had the
btw, the module located in
Hi,
2013/2/12 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
Done in r54999 and 55017.
thanks, Martin
--
Martin Landa landa.martin gmail.com * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Hi all,
I have tested again i.segment and discovered that for the NC Landsat
2000 imagery the module takes nearly 7 hours for reasonable
segmentation. The i.segment.xl module does the same in 10 seconds. The
region consists of 250 000 cells, not so much. In the documentation it
says that
Markus Metz wrote:
Hi all,
I have tested again i.segment and discovered that for the NC Landsat
2000 imagery the module takes nearly 7 hours for reasonable
segmentation. The i.segment.xl module does the same in 10 seconds. The
region consists of 250 000 cells, not so much. In the
Thanks Markus and Eric,
I have similar feedback when testing on various SPOT5 scenes. XL results
are not entirely identical of course, but reasonably similar, so I support
Markus' decision.
Cheers,
Pierre
On Feb 11, 2013 10:53 PM, Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Pierre Roudier
pierre.roud...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Markus and Eric,
I have similar feedback when testing on various SPOT5 scenes. XL results are
not entirely identical of course, but reasonably similar, so I support
Markus' decision.
I can make the results
Absolutely Markus. Let's also keep in mind that comparing segmentation
results is a very tricky exercise. There's no such thing as a perfect
segmentation result IMHO.
Pierre
2013/2/12 Markus Metz markus.metz.gisw...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Pierre Roudier
Sorry for not responding right away, I hadn't realized the code sprint
started (finished?!) already. There is a paper deadline this month and a
thesis to write that has consumed my attention... I don't think I'll have
time for anything in February. If noone else wants/needs to do it sooner,
I
On 02/02/13 17:37, Markus Metz wrote:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
Markus and Yann,
If you have the time it might be a great opportunity to use the community
sprint to get i.segment from the addons to trunk. What do you think ?
I would
Markus and Yann,
If you have the time it might be a great opportunity to use the
community sprint to get i.segment from the addons to trunk. What do you
think ?
Moritz
___
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Moritz Lennert
mlenn...@club.worldonline.be wrote:
Markus and Yann,
If you have the time it might be a great opportunity to use the community
sprint to get i.segment from the addons to trunk. What do you think ?
I would prefer i.segment.xl for speed reasons
13 matches
Mail list logo
