Hi Martin,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Martin Landa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-01-17 14:31 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler :
> > +1 to the new layout.
>
> I changed the layout, updated build scripts, `g.extension`, website
> and also set up redirection links for 7.0.3RC2 to be sure that
> `g.extension`
Hi,
2016-01-17 14:31 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler :
> +1 to the new layout.
I changed the layout, updated build scripts, `g.extension`, website
and also set up redirection links for 7.0.3RC2 to be sure that
`g.extension` will work also there.
Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
h
Markus Neteler wrote
> On Jan 17, 2016 2:13 PM, "Martin Landa" <
> landa.martin@
> > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2016-01-14 17:50 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa <
> landa.martin@
> >:
>> > on the other hand, eg. [1] have same layout (platform first).
>>
>> any other comments? Any objection to change layout
On Jan 17, 2016 2:13 PM, "Martin Landa" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> 2016-01-14 17:50 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa :
> > on the other hand, eg. [1] have same layout (platform first).
>
> any other comments? Any objection to change layout at wingrass.fsv.cvut.cz
>
> from
>
> * x86
> ** grass70
> ** grass71
> * x86
Hi,
2016-01-14 17:50 GMT+01:00 Martin Landa :
> on the other hand, eg. [1] have same layout (platform first).
any other comments? Any objection to change layout at wingrass.fsv.cvut.cz
from
* x86
** grass70
** grass71
* x86_64
** grass70
** grass71
to
* grass70
** x86
** x86_64
* grass71
** x
Hi,
2016-01-14 17:33 GMT+01:00 Moritz Lennert :
> I agree that version should have priority over architecture.
on the other hand, eg. [1] have same layout (platform first).
Ma
[1] http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mento
On 14/01/16 14:18, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
currently the wingrass.fsv.cvut.cz [1] uses layout described bellow:
* x86
** grass70
** grass71
* x86_64
** grass70
** grass71
I started thinking that probably better layout would be:
* grass70
** x86
** x86_64
* grass71
** x86
** x86_64
If it will
Hi,
2016-01-14 14:40 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler :
>> why? It's fresh issue (we are now coming with 64bit builds), would be
>> good go stabilize layout ASAP. Ma
>
> So then it should go into RC2 which I "luckily" didn't manage to package yet.
and do you think that it make sense to change the curren
On 14 January 2016 at 14:30, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-01-14 14:24 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
>
>> could we postpone this to 7.0.4?
>
> why? It's fresh issue (we are now coming with 64bit builds), would be
> good go stabilize layout ASAP. Ma
>
ok, so let's move
--
ciao
Luca
http://gis
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-01-14 14:24 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
>
>> could we postpone this to 7.0.4?
>
> why? It's fresh issue (we are now coming with 64bit builds), would be
> good go stabilize layout ASAP. Ma
So then it should go into RC2 which I "luck
Hi,
2016-01-14 14:24 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi :
> could we postpone this to 7.0.4?
why? It's fresh issue (we are now coming with 64bit builds), would be
good go stabilize layout ASAP. Ma
--
Martin Landa
http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa
__
On 14 January 2016 at 14:18, Martin Landa wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Martin,
> currently the wingrass.fsv.cvut.cz [1] uses layout described bellow:
>
> * x86
> ** grass70
> ** grass71
> * x86_64
> ** grass70
> ** grass71
>
> I started thinking that probably better layout would be:
>
> * grass70
> ** x86
Hi,
currently the wingrass.fsv.cvut.cz [1] uses layout described bellow:
* x86
** grass70
** grass71
* x86_64
** grass70
** grass71
I started thinking that probably better layout would be:
* grass70
** x86
** x86_64
* grass71
** x86
** x86_64
If it will be changed that ideally before releasing
13 matches
Mail list logo