Something must have changed in the subversion repository and I want to
confirm that this is a deliberate change.
At least once a week when I'm working with grass I start by checking for
upgrades using 'svn up'. The past month or two the server's response is that
I'm already at the current
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Paul Shapley wrote:
>
> Hi Users,
>
> Apologies if i'm posting this error again but i need to get pass the
memory allocation issue of trying to allocate 3gb memory. The Grass version
is (using file r.contour). Processor has 32 gb ram and i've allocated 3
mb
On 20/06/18 13:18, Moritz Lennert wrote:
Actually I noticed that your error message concerned the qbwwv voting
algorithm which wasn't in the command line you provided. I was just able
to reproduce your error using that same voting scheme. I'll have to dig
into this a bit deeper to see where the
Hi Users,
Apologies if i'm posting this error again but i need to get pass the memory
allocation issue of trying to allocate 3gb memory. The Grass version is
(using file r.contour). Processor has 32 gb ram and i've allocated 3 mb
under memory option of 'i.segment'.
System Info
GRASS
On 19/06/18 19:32, Jamille Haarloo wrote:
Hi Moritz,
Thanx for the advice! Will check it out. From the publications I read, I
inferred it was better to use an alternative method (data mining/
object-based) on high resolution imagery than pixel-based.
Generally this is true, but when you
