Tim wrote:
> I question when looking at :
> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons
>
> I wonder:
> * why is there a separate branch per major grass version?
between grass 5, 6, and 7 the library APIs change and the
module options/flags change, so a module written for one
often won't wor
>> Below a suggestion for the packaging structure:
>> regarding addon packaging. We can create packages like
>> grassaddons(full addons)
>> grassaddons-imgagery
>> grassaddons-vector
>> grassaddons-raster
>> grasssaddons-general
I question when looking at :
http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass
Tim wrote:
> Below a suggestion for the packaging structure:
> regarding addon packaging. We can create packages like
> grassaddons(full addons)
> grassaddons-imgagery
> grassaddons-vector
> grassaddons-raster
> grasssaddons-general
if you do it, please name the pacakges like "grass-addons-*",
and
Tim Michelsen writes:
+1
unfortunately not able to help.
> Dear community of GRASS users,
> is there a need for having packages for the GRASS addons?
>
> Please give feedback by:
> (+1 / 0 / -1)
>
> And of saying yes (+1), would you voluteer in heping with packaing and
> maintaining the daily b
Dear community of GRASS users,
is there a need for having packages for the GRASS addons?
Please give feedback by:
(+1 / 0 / -1)
And of saying yes (+1), would you voluteer in heping with packaing and
maintaining the daily builds of the PPA?
Please give feedback by:
(+1 / 0 / -1)
> Below a sugge