Re: [graylog2] should there be a "replace extractors" option?

2016-03-06 Thread Jason Haar
Sure, but I'm thinking of this from a usability perspective. A lot of people will have lots of extractor rules, so having a "replace extractor" option just makes more sense (to me ;-) (I've had serious issues with filling the heap cache recently that just makes me want to avoid triggering it again

Re: [graylog2] should there be a "replace extractors" option?

2016-03-06 Thread Joi Owen
Could you pause processing while you do the export/import? On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Jason Haar wrote: > Hi there > > I have a bunch of extractor rules for our syslog INPUT. That means I > actually have a UDP, TCP and TCP/TLS INPUT channel for syslog - and > obviously want the extractors t

[graylog2] should there be a "replace extractors" option?

2016-03-06 Thread Jason Haar
Hi there I have a bunch of extractor rules for our syslog INPUT. That means I actually have a UDP, TCP and TCP/TLS INPUT channel for syslog - and obviously want the extractors to be the same over the three of them Currently I have to edit one of them, get new changes working, and then delete all