[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-03-03 Thread Artur Tarassow
Am 02.03.21 um 21:32 schrieb Artur Tarassow: Am 02.03.21 um 17:46 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, atecon wrote: Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-03-02 Thread Artur Tarassow
Am 02.03.21 um 17:46 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, atecon wrote: Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: I can't

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-03-02 Thread Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, atecon wrote: Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function s

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-03-02 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 02.03.2021 um 15:31 schrieb atecon: Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Jack, would you take care of pushing this into 'extra', or is further discussion needed? Please, what's the status here? Hi, I asked Jack to think about the po

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-03-02 Thread atecon
Am 02.03.2021 15:11 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function seems to me a good candidate for "e

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-03-02 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 26.02.2021 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: I can't think of an easier way of doing this, and your function seems to me a good candidate for "extra". One possible modification would be: funct

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-02-26 Thread Artur Tarassow
Am 26.02.21 um 10:51 schrieb Sven Schreiber: Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: My question is: is there a simpler way to accomplish the above? And if there isn't, would it be worthwhile to add this function to the extra packag

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-02-26 Thread Sven Schreiber
Am 19.02.2021 um 13:52 schrieb Allin Cottrell: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: My question is: is there a simpler way to accomplish the above? And if there isn't, would it be worthwhile to add this function to the extra package? I can't think of an easier way of doing t

[Gretl-devel] Re: inverse of stack() function

2021-02-19 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote: We have the very nice stack() function, that helps you turn a list of series into a single panel series. Unless I'm missing something, I don't think we have the opposite function, that is a function turning a panel series into a multi-colum