[Gretl-users] New mailing list? (was Re: Johansen question)

2011-05-02 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote: > Before creating a new list for discussion of econometrics, maybe it > would be worthwhile to check if another list already serves the same > purpose (see for example > http://www.feweb.vu.nl/econometriclinks/mailing/). Good idea, but it seems there isn'

Re: [Gretl-users] New mailing list? (was Re: Johansen question)

2011-05-02 Thread Summers , Peter
Behalf Of Allin Cottrell Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 1:42 PM To: Gretl list Subject: [Gretl-users] New mailing list? (was Re: Johansen question) On Mon, 2 May 2011, Sven Schreiber wrote: > Before creating a new list for discussion of econometrics, maybe it > would be worthwhile to check if

Re: [Gretl-users] New mailing list? (was Re: Johansen question)

2011-05-03 Thread Jack
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote: >> OTOH, I'm not overly enthusiastic to have general econometric >> discussions on gretl-users. It's true that the traffic here is >> not high, and this is also due to the fact that in the past >> off-topic (=not gretl-specific) questions have been discour

Re: [Gretl-users] New mailing list? (was Re: Johansen question)

2011-05-03 Thread artur tarassow
Actually, I like the idea of sharing replications and discussing potential problems on this level. I could imagine that this would ensure high quality discussion as well as liveliness in the forum. Best, Artur 2011/5/3 Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti : > On Mon, 2 May 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote: > >>>

Re: [Gretl-users] New mailing list? (was Re: Johansen question)

2011-05-03 Thread Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
1- I do not feel uncomfortable with the number of "methodological" messages that receives this list. 2- I understand that someone could prefer don't to receive such messages. A different and intermediate possibility to that discused until now may be to setup a "methods" topic for the list. The