Hi John,
At 2024-02-28T07:26:21+1100, John Gardner wrote:
> Hi Branden,
>
> Wouldn't this conflict with behaviour documented in groff_tmac(5)? From the
> section *"Inclusion"* (emphasis mine):
Very much so, which is why I am submitting the proposal to this mailing
list for
Hi Branden,
Wouldn't this conflict with behaviour documented in groff_tmac(5)? From the
section *"Inclusion"* (emphasis mine):
GNU troff offers an improved feature in the similar request “*mso*
> *package-file-name*”, which searches the macro path for
> *package-file-name*. Because its argument
I'd like to suggest the attached diff.
What removing this code would do is make the `mso` request no longer
look for "tmac.s" if "s.tmac" is specified as the request's argument,
and vice versa.
Here's my case against.
1. It's needless complexity.
2. The main things you'd need this for are
